Assortative mating and the dark triad: Evidence from the UK, Fiji, and meta-analytic review

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112754
Gareth Richards , Hannah Proctor , Eva Lee , Ofa Swann , Emily Jackson , John Galvin , Robin I.M. Dunbar , Simon Baron-Cohen , Shanhong Luo
{"title":"Assortative mating and the dark triad: Evidence from the UK, Fiji, and meta-analytic review","authors":"Gareth Richards ,&nbsp;Hannah Proctor ,&nbsp;Eva Lee ,&nbsp;Ofa Swann ,&nbsp;Emily Jackson ,&nbsp;John Galvin ,&nbsp;Robin I.M. Dunbar ,&nbsp;Simon Baron-Cohen ,&nbsp;Shanhong Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ‘dark triad’ represents the socially aversive personality traits of Machiavellianism, subclinical narcissism (henceforth, ‘narcissim’), and subclinical psychopathy (henceforth, ‘psychopathy’). There is evidence of assortative mating suggesting romantic partners are more similar than chance for these traits at the start of relationships (initial assortment) and not becoming alike with time (convergence), that people seek out partners to whom they are similar (active assortment), and that partner resemblance is not explained by social stratification processes (social homogamy). As the literature relates primarily to Eastern European and North American populations, we present studies from the UK (<em>N</em> = 104 couples) and Fiji (<em>N</em> = 99 couples). These showed significant positive assortment for each dark triad trait (other than psychopathy in the Fijian sample), and suggest the effects are explained by initial and active assortment and not by convergence or social homogamy. We also submitted the literature to meta-analytic review (Machiavellianism: <em>k</em> = 10, <em>N</em> = 1302; narcissism: <em>k</em> = 14, <em>N</em> = 1645; psychopathy: <em>k</em> = 13, <em>N</em> = 1989) and observed positive within-couple correlations of small (narcissism, psychopathy) to medium (Machiavellianism) effect size for each of the dark triad traits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924002149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ‘dark triad’ represents the socially aversive personality traits of Machiavellianism, subclinical narcissism (henceforth, ‘narcissim’), and subclinical psychopathy (henceforth, ‘psychopathy’). There is evidence of assortative mating suggesting romantic partners are more similar than chance for these traits at the start of relationships (initial assortment) and not becoming alike with time (convergence), that people seek out partners to whom they are similar (active assortment), and that partner resemblance is not explained by social stratification processes (social homogamy). As the literature relates primarily to Eastern European and North American populations, we present studies from the UK (N = 104 couples) and Fiji (N = 99 couples). These showed significant positive assortment for each dark triad trait (other than psychopathy in the Fijian sample), and suggest the effects are explained by initial and active assortment and not by convergence or social homogamy. We also submitted the literature to meta-analytic review (Machiavellianism: k = 10, N = 1302; narcissism: k = 14, N = 1645; psychopathy: k = 13, N = 1989) and observed positive within-couple correlations of small (narcissism, psychopathy) to medium (Machiavellianism) effect size for each of the dark triad traits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同类交配和黑暗三合会:来自英国、斐济的证据和元分析综述
黑暗三人组 "代表了马基雅维利主义、亚临床自恋(以下简称 "自恋")和亚临床心理变态(以下简称 "心理变态")等社会厌恶型人格特征。有证据表明,同类交配表明,恋爱关系开始时,恋爱伴侣在这些特质上的相似性高于偶然性(初始同类交配),但随着时间的推移,相似性不会增加(趋同);人们会寻找与自己相似的伴侣(主动同类交配);伴侣的相似性不能用社会分层过程(社会同性交配)来解释。由于相关文献主要涉及东欧和北美人口,我们介绍了英国(N = 104 对)和斐济(N = 99 对)的研究。这些研究显示,每种黑暗三重性特质(斐济样本中除变态心理外)都有明显的正分类,并表明这些效应是由初始和主动分类而非趋同或社会同配所解释的。我们还对文献进行了元分析审查(马基雅维利主义:k = 10,N = 1302;自恋:k = 14,N = 1645;变态:k = 13,N = 1989),并观察到每种黑暗三合会特质都具有小(自恋、变态)到中(马基雅维利主义)效应规模的正偶内相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Ambition as a doubled-edged sword: Career success and unethical behavior Different shades of narcissism at work: The relationships of narcissism dimensions with work-related outcomes The relation between adverse experiences and proactive aggression: The moderating role of emotional sensitivity Religious perfectionism, spiritual struggles, and sense of community: Associations with depression among ultra-Orthodox Jews Linking personality to gratitude in the Chinese context: The mediating role of regulatory emotional self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1