Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake dynamics in anthropized and conserved Caatinga dry forests

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Arid Environments Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105242
Elizabete Cristina Araújo Silva , Jakson Leite , Maria Claudjane Jerônimo Leite Alves , Claudiana Moura dos Santos , Luís Felipe Daibes , Paulo Ivan Fernandes-Júnior , Flávia de Barros Prado Moura , José Vieira Silva
{"title":"Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake dynamics in anthropized and conserved Caatinga dry forests","authors":"Elizabete Cristina Araújo Silva ,&nbsp;Jakson Leite ,&nbsp;Maria Claudjane Jerônimo Leite Alves ,&nbsp;Claudiana Moura dos Santos ,&nbsp;Luís Felipe Daibes ,&nbsp;Paulo Ivan Fernandes-Júnior ,&nbsp;Flávia de Barros Prado Moura ,&nbsp;José Vieira Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding human impacts on drylands is crucial in a global scenario of forest degradation and biodiversity loss. This study analyzed foliar concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) in the Brazilian seasonally dry tropical forests (Caatinga). Foliar patterns of N, P, and the N/P ratio were assessed both within and among botanical families. To do this, 10 plots were established in an anthropized area and 10 in a conserved area. Within each plot, leaves from all tree species and soil samples from four random points were collected. Stoichiometric analyses were performed on the leaves of 136 trees from 14 botanical families. Significant differences were observed in soil P concentrations, organic matter content, and cation exchange capacity, with the highest values found in the conserved area. Foliar N and P concentrations and N/P were also higher in the conserved area for the F+ (nitrogen-fixing Fabaceae), F- (non-nitrogen-fixing Fabaceae), and NF (non-Fabaceae) groups, indicating greater efficiency in nutrient retention and cycling. When comparing species found in both areas, <em>Aspidosperma pyrifolium</em> (NF), <em>Bauhinia forficata</em> (F-), and <em>Mimosa ophthalmocentra</em> (F+) showed significant differences in foliar N concentrations and foliar P (for <em>A. pyrifolium</em> and <em>B. forficata</em> only). Degradation of the Caatinga directly impacts nutrient cycling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arid Environments","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 105242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arid Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196324001228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding human impacts on drylands is crucial in a global scenario of forest degradation and biodiversity loss. This study analyzed foliar concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) in the Brazilian seasonally dry tropical forests (Caatinga). Foliar patterns of N, P, and the N/P ratio were assessed both within and among botanical families. To do this, 10 plots were established in an anthropized area and 10 in a conserved area. Within each plot, leaves from all tree species and soil samples from four random points were collected. Stoichiometric analyses were performed on the leaves of 136 trees from 14 botanical families. Significant differences were observed in soil P concentrations, organic matter content, and cation exchange capacity, with the highest values found in the conserved area. Foliar N and P concentrations and N/P were also higher in the conserved area for the F+ (nitrogen-fixing Fabaceae), F- (non-nitrogen-fixing Fabaceae), and NF (non-Fabaceae) groups, indicating greater efficiency in nutrient retention and cycling. When comparing species found in both areas, Aspidosperma pyrifolium (NF), Bauhinia forficata (F-), and Mimosa ophthalmocentra (F+) showed significant differences in foliar N concentrations and foliar P (for A. pyrifolium and B. forficata only). Degradation of the Caatinga directly impacts nutrient cycling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类活动和受保护的卡廷加干旱森林的氮和磷吸收动态
在全球森林退化和生物多样性丧失的情况下,了解人类对旱地的影响至关重要。本研究分析了巴西季节性干旱热带森林(Caatinga)中叶片的氮(N)和磷(P)浓度。研究评估了植物科内和植物科间氮、磷的叶面模式以及氮磷比。为此,在人类活动区和保护区各建立了 10 个小区。在每个小区内,收集了所有树种的叶片和四个随机点的土壤样本。对 14 个植物科 136 棵树的叶子进行了化学计量分析。结果表明,土壤中的磷浓度、有机质含量和阳离子交换容量存在显著差异,其中保护区的数值最高。在保护区,F+(固氮豆科植物)、F-(非固氮豆科植物)和 NF(非豆科植物)组的叶面氮和磷浓度以及氮/磷比例也更高,这表明保护区的养分保持和循环效率更高。在比较两个地区发现的物种时,Aspidosperma pyrifolium(NF)、Bauhinia forficata(F-)和 Mimosa ophthalmocentra(F+)的叶面氮浓度和叶面磷浓度(仅 A. pyrifolium 和 B. forficata)存在显著差异。Caatinga 的退化直接影响养分循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arid Environments
Journal of Arid Environments 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arid Environments is an international journal publishing original scientific and technical research articles on physical, biological and cultural aspects of arid, semi-arid, and desert environments. As a forum of multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary dialogue it addresses research on all aspects of arid environments and their past, present and future use.
期刊最新文献
Valuing drought impact mitigation on ecosystem services in a Mediterranean country Resource allocation below- and above-ground organs and their association to the environment in Mammillaria Haw. (Cactaceae) Think outside the road: Negev connectivity beyond the ‘Nabatean incense route’ Investigating the impacts of climate variations and armed conflict on drought and vegetation cover in Northeast Syria (2000–2023) Corrigendum to “Bringing water values into play in the Atacama desert water crisis” [J. Arid Environ. (2024) 1–12 105256]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1