Impact of psychological distance on public acceptance of waste-to-energy combustion projects

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107631
Qianqian Zhou , Xiaoyan Luo , Xin Gao , Bo Xia , Yongjian Ke , Martin Skitmore , Yong Liu
{"title":"Impact of psychological distance on public acceptance of waste-to-energy combustion projects","authors":"Qianqian Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Luo ,&nbsp;Xin Gao ,&nbsp;Bo Xia ,&nbsp;Yongjian Ke ,&nbsp;Martin Skitmore ,&nbsp;Yong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Waste-to-energy (WTE) projects have attracted considerable attention due to their role in addressing waste management issues and promoting renewable energy production. However, while public acceptance of these projects remains controversial, psychological distance (PD) may be a key shaping factor in their construction. This study, grounded in the Construal Level Theory (CLT) and social distance theory of power, uses a behavioral investigation experiment to examine the role of PD in WTE facilities. The findings reveal that shorter PD is associated with higher public perception of risk and lower perception of economic benefits, fairness, and public acceptance. Additionally, a closer social distance of power tends to correspond with lower construal levels and a greater inclination to support the construction of WTE facilities, further supporting the CLT and social distance theory of power. The findings provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the sustainable development of WTE facilities, encouraging a sense of shared destiny and collaborative governance across society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 107631"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552400218X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waste-to-energy (WTE) projects have attracted considerable attention due to their role in addressing waste management issues and promoting renewable energy production. However, while public acceptance of these projects remains controversial, psychological distance (PD) may be a key shaping factor in their construction. This study, grounded in the Construal Level Theory (CLT) and social distance theory of power, uses a behavioral investigation experiment to examine the role of PD in WTE facilities. The findings reveal that shorter PD is associated with higher public perception of risk and lower perception of economic benefits, fairness, and public acceptance. Additionally, a closer social distance of power tends to correspond with lower construal levels and a greater inclination to support the construction of WTE facilities, further supporting the CLT and social distance theory of power. The findings provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the sustainable development of WTE facilities, encouraging a sense of shared destiny and collaborative governance across society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理距离对公众接受垃圾焚烧发电项目的影响
废物变能源(WTE)项目在解决废物管理问题和促进可再生能源生产方面发挥着重要作用,因此备受关注。然而,尽管公众对这些项目的接受程度仍存在争议,但心理距离(PD)可能是影响这些项目建设的关键因素。本研究以构想水平理论(CLT)和权力的社会距离理论为基础,采用行为调查实验来研究心理距离在 WTE 设施中的作用。研究结果表明,较短的PD与较高的公众风险感知、较低的经济效益感知、公平性和公众接受度相关。此外,较近的权力社会距离往往与较低的构想水平和支持建设 WTE 设施的更大倾向相对应,这进一步支持了权力社会距离理论。研究结果为可持续发展湿热发电设施提供了理论支持和实践指导,鼓励了全社会的命运共同体意识和协同治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1