Gradient boosting decision trees to study laboratory and field performance in pavement management

IF 8.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1111/mice.13322
Mohammadjavad Berangi, Bernardo Mota Lontra, Kumar Anupam, Sandra Erkens, Dave Van Vliet, Almar Snippe, Mahesh Moenielal
{"title":"Gradient boosting decision trees to study laboratory and field performance in pavement management","authors":"Mohammadjavad Berangi, Bernardo Mota Lontra, Kumar Anupam, Sandra Erkens, Dave Van Vliet, Almar Snippe, Mahesh Moenielal","doi":"10.1111/mice.13322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inconsistencies between performance data from laboratory‐prepared and field samples have been widely reported. These inconsistencies often result in inaccurate condition prediction, which leads to inefficient maintenance planning. Traditional pavement management systems (PMS) do not have the appropriate means (e.g., mechanistic solutions, extensive data handling facilities, etc.) to consider these data inconsistencies. With the growing demand for sustainable materials, there is a need for more self‐learning systems that could quickly transfer laboratory‐based information to field‐based information inside the PMS. The article aims to present a future‐ready machine learning‐based framework for analyzing the differences between laboratory and field‐prepared samples. Developed on the basis of data obtained from field and laboratory data, the gradient‐boosting decision trees‐based framework was able to establish a good relationship between laboratory performance and field performance (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup><jats:sub>test</jats:sub> &gt; 80 for all models). At the same time, the framework could also show more complex relationships that are often not considered in practice.","PeriodicalId":156,"journal":{"name":"Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.13322","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inconsistencies between performance data from laboratory‐prepared and field samples have been widely reported. These inconsistencies often result in inaccurate condition prediction, which leads to inefficient maintenance planning. Traditional pavement management systems (PMS) do not have the appropriate means (e.g., mechanistic solutions, extensive data handling facilities, etc.) to consider these data inconsistencies. With the growing demand for sustainable materials, there is a need for more self‐learning systems that could quickly transfer laboratory‐based information to field‐based information inside the PMS. The article aims to present a future‐ready machine learning‐based framework for analyzing the differences between laboratory and field‐prepared samples. Developed on the basis of data obtained from field and laboratory data, the gradient‐boosting decision trees‐based framework was able to establish a good relationship between laboratory performance and field performance (R2test > 80 for all models). At the same time, the framework could also show more complex relationships that are often not considered in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用梯度提升决策树研究路面管理的实验室和现场性能
实验室制备的样本和现场样本的性能数据之间的不一致已被广泛报道。这些不一致往往会导致状况预测不准确,从而导致养护规划效率低下。传统的路面管理系统(PMS)没有适当的手段(如机械解决方案、广泛的数据处理设施等)来考虑这些数据的不一致性。随着对可持续材料的需求不断增长,需要有更多的自学习系统,能够在路面管理系统中将实验室信息快速转换为现场信息。本文旨在介绍一种基于机器学习的未来就绪框架,用于分析实验室样品和现场制备样品之间的差异。基于梯度提升决策树的框架是在现场和实验室数据的基础上开发的,能够在实验室性能和现场性能之间建立良好的关系(所有模型的 R2test > 80)。同时,该框架还能显示出在实践中往往没有考虑到的更复杂的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
19.80%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering stands as a scholarly, peer-reviewed archival journal, serving as a vital link between advancements in computer technology and civil and infrastructure engineering. The journal serves as a distinctive platform for the publication of original articles, spotlighting novel computational techniques and inventive applications of computers. Specifically, it concentrates on recent progress in computer and information technologies, fostering the development and application of emerging computing paradigms. Encompassing a broad scope, the journal addresses bridge, construction, environmental, highway, geotechnical, structural, transportation, and water resources engineering. It extends its reach to the management of infrastructure systems, covering domains such as highways, bridges, pavements, airports, and utilities. The journal delves into areas like artificial intelligence, cognitive modeling, concurrent engineering, database management, distributed computing, evolutionary computing, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, geometric modeling, internet-based technologies, knowledge discovery and engineering, machine learning, mobile computing, multimedia technologies, networking, neural network computing, optimization and search, parallel processing, robotics, smart structures, software engineering, virtual reality, and visualization techniques.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning‐aided prediction of windstorm‐induced vibration responses of long‐span suspension bridges A bridge point cloud databank for digital bridge understanding Automated seismic event detection considering faulty data interference using deep learning and Bayesian fusion Smartphone-based high durable strain sensor with sub-pixel-level accuracy and adjustable camera position Reinforcement learning-based approach for urban road project scheduling considering alternative closure types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1