Patients' health related quality of life after massive weight loss reconstruction in the Netherlands.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2024.2393328
Guus van Uittert, Maarten Hoogbergen, Charlotte Beaudart, Nannan Li, Mijke Boers, Mickaël Hiligsmann
{"title":"Patients' health related quality of life after massive weight loss reconstruction in the Netherlands.","authors":"Guus van Uittert, Maarten Hoogbergen, Charlotte Beaudart, Nannan Li, Mijke Boers, Mickaël Hiligsmann","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2393328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of undergoing massive weight loss reconstruction (MWR) on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective study was performed among 131 Dutch bariatric patients, divided into two groups: an intervention group (93 patients who had undergone MWR) and a control group (38 patients who had not undergone MWR). HR-QoL was assessed by the validated BODY-q questionnaire. The sign test was used to measure the difference between the 0 and 12 months' measurements of HR-QoL in both groups, whereas multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess whether undergoing MWR significantly predicted participants' incremental HR-QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whereas the intervention group showed a significance improvement on all parameters of the BODY-q between 0 and 12 months (all parameters <i>p</i> < .001), the control group did not. The multiple regression analysis showed that having undergone a MWR significantly and positively predicted incremental HR-QoL on all scales on the BODY-q (all parameters <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study suggests a positive impact of MWR on the HR-QoL of bariatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"517-526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2393328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of undergoing massive weight loss reconstruction (MWR) on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in the Netherlands.

Method: A retrospective study was performed among 131 Dutch bariatric patients, divided into two groups: an intervention group (93 patients who had undergone MWR) and a control group (38 patients who had not undergone MWR). HR-QoL was assessed by the validated BODY-q questionnaire. The sign test was used to measure the difference between the 0 and 12 months' measurements of HR-QoL in both groups, whereas multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess whether undergoing MWR significantly predicted participants' incremental HR-QoL.

Results: Whereas the intervention group showed a significance improvement on all parameters of the BODY-q between 0 and 12 months (all parameters p < .001), the control group did not. The multiple regression analysis showed that having undergone a MWR significantly and positively predicted incremental HR-QoL on all scales on the BODY-q (all parameters p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The present study suggests a positive impact of MWR on the HR-QoL of bariatric patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰大规模减重重建后患者的健康相关生活质量。
研究目的本研究旨在评估在荷兰接受大规模减重重建(MWR)对健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)的影响:方法:对131名荷兰减肥患者进行回顾性研究,分为两组:干预组(93名接受过大规模减重重建术的患者)和对照组(38名未接受过大规模减重重建术的患者)。HR-QoL 通过有效的 BODY-q 问卷进行评估。采用符号检验来测量两组患者 0 个月和 12 个月心率-QoL 测量值之间的差异,同时进行多元回归分析,以评估接受 MWR 是否能显著预测参与者的心率-QoL 增量:结果:干预组在 0 至 12 个月期间的 BODY-q 所有参数均有显著改善(所有参数 p p 结论:本研究表明,MWR 对减肥患者的 HR-QoL 有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
How do we approach integrating digital endpoint studies into Health technology assessment? Cost of rimegepant and lasmiditan associated adverse events, for acute treatment in migraine in Spain. The pharmaceutical market: a transdisciplinary description of concepts and their implications. Cost-utility of pre-emptive plerixafor versus rescue plerixafor in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in multiple myeloma. Institutional single-center cost-opportunity analysis of disposable vs. reusable cystoscopes in a referral oncology center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1