首页 > 最新文献

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research最新文献

英文 中文
Preferences of nurses in the United Kingdom for attributes of pediatric hexavalent vaccines: a discrete-choice experiment.
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2450352
Christine Poulos, Tomas Marcek, Phani Chintakayala, Marco Boeri, Amy Francis, Edith Langevin, Tanaz Petigara, Jenny O'Connor, Salome Samant

Objectives: Given the limited evidence on UK nurses' preferences for pediatric hexavalent vaccines, we aimed to evaluate their preferences for these vaccines' attributes.

Methods: In a discrete-choice experiment study, 150 nurses chose between 2 hypothetical pediatric hexavalent vaccines with varying attribute levels (device type, plastic in packaging, time on the market, and time the vaccine can stay safely at room temperature) in a series of choice questions. Using random-parameters logit-model estimates, conditional relative attribute importance (CRAI) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.

Results: Device type (with associated preparation time and risk of dosage errors) was the most important attribute (CRAI, 61%), followed by years on the market (CRAI, 25%). The odds of choosing a prefilled syringe were nearly 3 times the odds of choosing syringe-and-vial combinations requiring reconstitution (OR, 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93-3.68). Vaccines on the market for < 1 year were less likely to be preferred to vaccines available for > 3 years (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84). ORs for time a vaccine can stay at room temperature (3 vs. 6 days) (0.94; 95% CI, 0.71-1.16) and plastic blisters in packaging (1.19; 95% CI, 0.80-1.56) were not significant, indicating that these attributes did not influence choices.

Conclusions: In this survey, nurses' preferences were mainly influenced by device type.

{"title":"Preferences of nurses in the United Kingdom for attributes of pediatric hexavalent vaccines: a discrete-choice experiment.","authors":"Christine Poulos, Tomas Marcek, Phani Chintakayala, Marco Boeri, Amy Francis, Edith Langevin, Tanaz Petigara, Jenny O'Connor, Salome Samant","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2450352","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2450352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given the limited evidence on UK nurses' preferences for pediatric hexavalent vaccines, we aimed to evaluate their preferences for these vaccines' attributes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a discrete-choice experiment study, 150 nurses chose between 2 hypothetical pediatric hexavalent vaccines with varying attribute levels (device type, plastic in packaging, time on the market, and time the vaccine can stay safely at room temperature) in a series of choice questions. Using random-parameters logit-model estimates, conditional relative attribute importance (CRAI) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Device type (with associated preparation time and risk of dosage errors) was the most important attribute (CRAI, 61%), followed by years on the market (CRAI, 25%). The odds of choosing a prefilled syringe were nearly 3 times the odds of choosing syringe-and-vial combinations requiring reconstitution (OR, 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93-3.68). Vaccines on the market for < 1 year were less likely to be preferred to vaccines available for > 3 years (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84). ORs for time a vaccine can stay at room temperature (3 vs. 6 days) (0.94; 95% CI, 0.71-1.16) and plastic blisters in packaging (1.19; 95% CI, 0.80-1.56) were not significant, indicating that these attributes did not influence choices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this survey, nurses' preferences were mainly influenced by device type.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143058517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of biological drug consumption in Italy during 2022: a comparative analysis between two healthcare facilities. 2022 年意大利生物药品消耗量评估:两家医疗机构的对比分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2465445
Marcello Vaccaro, Giacomo Polito, Gabriele Bagaglini, Maurizio Capuozzo, Roberto Langella, Eduardo Nava, Andrea Zovi, Francesco Ferrara

Background: Biosimilar drugs represent a valuable opportunity for healthcare systems worldwide as they offer substantial cost savings. This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the current prescribing trend in order to raise awareness among physicians for more appropriate prescribing.

Research design and methods: A study was conducted to assess the use of major biologic drugs across different therapeutic areas within two Italian healthcare entities. Usage and cost data were obtained from company databases. In addition, a comparison with 2021 data was performed to identify any increases in biosimilar drug utilization during 2022.

Results: The analysis for 2022 revealed that the majority of studied active ingredients have been administered as biosimilar drugs, with percentages close to 100%, except for a few exceptions. In particular, resistance remained in the prescription of biosimilar adalimumab (73.8%) and etanercept (73.3%) in Asl Napoli 3 Sud, erythropoietin (69.5%) and rituximab (72.8%) in Policlinico Umberto I.

Conclusions: A comparison between 2021 and 2022 highlighted the increasing adoption of biosimilar drugs. This positive trend suggested the potential for full utilization in the near future, benefiting significantly the National Health System and the public, ensuring a healthcare approach that is effective and sustainable.

{"title":"Evaluation of biological drug consumption in Italy during 2022: a comparative analysis between two healthcare facilities.","authors":"Marcello Vaccaro, Giacomo Polito, Gabriele Bagaglini, Maurizio Capuozzo, Roberto Langella, Eduardo Nava, Andrea Zovi, Francesco Ferrara","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2465445","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2465445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilar drugs represent a valuable opportunity for healthcare systems worldwide as they offer substantial cost savings. This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the current prescribing trend in order to raise awareness among physicians for more appropriate prescribing.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A study was conducted to assess the use of major biologic drugs across different therapeutic areas within two Italian healthcare entities. Usage and cost data were obtained from company databases. In addition, a comparison with 2021 data was performed to identify any increases in biosimilar drug utilization during 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis for 2022 revealed that the majority of studied active ingredients have been administered as biosimilar drugs, with percentages close to 100%, except for a few exceptions. In particular, resistance remained in the prescription of biosimilar adalimumab (73.8%) and etanercept (73.3%) in Asl Napoli 3 Sud, erythropoietin (69.5%) and rituximab (72.8%) in Policlinico Umberto I.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A comparison between 2021 and 2022 highlighted the increasing adoption of biosimilar drugs. This positive trend suggested the potential for full utilization in the near future, benefiting significantly the National Health System and the public, ensuring a healthcare approach that is effective and sustainable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-relevance of outcome measures in breast cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient preferences and trials conducted between 2014 and 2024.
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2467379
Jasmijn Plooij, Diana M J Delnoij

Background: Worldwide, many clinical trials are performed using clinical outcomes and surrogate outcomes as endpoints. Surrogate outcomes are used, for instance, if there is not enough follow-up time to measure the outcome of interest. Surrogate outcomes might not be patient-relevant, however. This study assesses to what extent patient-relevant outcomes are measured in clinical trials for breast cancer drugs.

Research design and methods: A cross-sectional comparative analysis was conducted in which patient preferences for outcomes derived from the literature were compared to outcomes measured in phase III breast cancer trials conducted between 2014 and 2024.

Results: Patients prefer outcomes addressing survival benefits, treatment effectiveness, adverse events and health-related quality of life. Minor improvements in survival benefits are greatly valued. The majority of patients are willing to accept some side effects for a positive outcome. The primary outcome used most frequently in trials is progression-free survival. The most common secondary outcomes are adverse events, mortality, overall response rate, and health-related quality of life.

Conclusion: Phase III trial outcomes appear to align largely with breast cancer patients' preferences. Nevertheless, patients and trial designers emphasize different outcomes. Improvement is therefore needed to enhance the relevance of trial data for patients.

{"title":"Patient-relevance of outcome measures in breast cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient preferences and trials conducted between 2014 and 2024.","authors":"Jasmijn Plooij, Diana M J Delnoij","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2467379","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2467379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide, many clinical trials are performed using clinical outcomes and surrogate outcomes as endpoints. Surrogate outcomes are used, for instance, if there is not enough follow-up time to measure the outcome of interest. Surrogate outcomes might not be patient-relevant, however. This study assesses to what extent patient-relevant outcomes are measured in clinical trials for breast cancer drugs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional comparative analysis was conducted in which patient preferences for outcomes derived from the literature were compared to outcomes measured in phase III breast cancer trials conducted between 2014 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients prefer outcomes addressing survival benefits, treatment effectiveness, adverse events and health-related quality of life. Minor improvements in survival benefits are greatly valued. The majority of patients are willing to accept some side effects for a positive outcome. The primary outcome used most frequently in trials is progression-free survival. The most common secondary outcomes are adverse events, mortality, overall response rate, and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phase III trial outcomes appear to align largely with breast cancer patients' preferences. Nevertheless, patients and trial designers emphasize different outcomes. Improvement is therefore needed to enhance the relevance of trial data for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost comparison of F(ab')2 and Fab antivenoms for pit viper envenomation in the United States: a real-world analysis.
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2462236
Walter Garcia-Ubbelohde, Lia Pizzicato, Keith J Boesen, Swapna Munnangi, Liucheng Shi, Nicholas B Hurst, Mitchell DeKoven

Background: This study compared healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost among patients treated for pit viper envenomation with Fab or F(ab')2 antivenom in the United States.

Research design and methods: Patients administered Fab or F(ab')2 between January 2019 and September 2022 were identified from IQVIA's New Data Warehouse and placed into two mutually exclusive cohorts. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline differences between cohorts. All-cause HCRU and cost were assessed in the 6-months following antivenom administration (post-index) and compared between IPTW-adjusted cohorts.

Results: In total, 242 and 98 patients receiving Fab and F(ab')2 were identified, respectively. Pre-IPTW adjustment, cohorts differed on demographics and select comorbidities (standardized mean difference [SMD] ≥0.10). Post-IPTW, most variables were balanced (SMD < 0.01). Post-index total (Fab: $70,994; F(ab')2: $55,324), medical ($69,162; $52,339), and inpatient costs ($49,466; $29,730) were higher among Fab than F(ab')2 patients (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, the total (cost ratio [CR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.98), inpatient (CR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51-0.79), and inpatient pharmacy costs (CR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.68) were lower in the F(ab')2 than Fab cohort.

Conclusions: Patients administered Fab had higher post-index total, inpatient, and inpatient pharmacy costs than patients administered F(ab')2 AV.

{"title":"Cost comparison of F(ab')<sub>2</sub> and Fab antivenoms for pit viper envenomation in the United States: a real-world analysis.","authors":"Walter Garcia-Ubbelohde, Lia Pizzicato, Keith J Boesen, Swapna Munnangi, Liucheng Shi, Nicholas B Hurst, Mitchell DeKoven","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2462236","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2462236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost among patients treated for pit viper envenomation with Fab or F(ab')<sub>2</sub> antivenom in the United States.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients administered Fab or F(ab')<sub>2</sub> between January 2019 and September 2022 were identified from IQVIA's New Data Warehouse and placed into two mutually exclusive cohorts. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline differences between cohorts. All-cause HCRU and cost were assessed in the 6-months following antivenom administration (post-index) and compared between IPTW-adjusted cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 242 and 98 patients receiving Fab and F(ab')<sub>2</sub> were identified, respectively. Pre-IPTW adjustment, cohorts differed on demographics and select comorbidities (standardized mean difference [SMD] ≥0.10). Post-IPTW, most variables were balanced (SMD < 0.01). Post-index total (Fab: $70,994; F(ab')<sub>2</sub>: $55,324), medical ($69,162; $52,339), and inpatient costs ($49,466; $29,730) were higher among Fab than F(ab')<sub>2</sub> patients (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, the total (cost ratio [CR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.98), inpatient (CR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51-0.79), and inpatient pharmacy costs (CR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.68) were lower in the F(ab')<sub>2</sub> than Fab cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients administered Fab had higher post-index total, inpatient, and inpatient pharmacy costs than patients administered F(ab')<sub>2</sub> AV.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143390536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Autologous stem-cell transplantation and maintenance therapy for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a network meta-analysis.
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2461636
Weijia Wu, Yannan Wang, Yingting Lou, Xiaoyuan Fan, Wenqianzi Yang, Fengyuan Tang, Zixuan Zhao, Hengjin Dong

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ASCT and maintenance therapy strategies for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma from a Chinese healthcare perspective.

Research design and methods: A short-run decision tree and a long-run Markov model were created to assess the mean costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of ASCT plus maintenance therapy over a lifetime horizon. Utility values were sourced from published literature, while healthcare costs were based on a single-center retrospective analysis and national drug bidding data.

Results: The ASCT strategy with two-year daratumumab maintenance had the lowest discounted costs (1,394,183 CNY). Compared to no ASCT with continuous lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT had an ICER of 90,997 CNY/QALY. With one-year lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT provided more QALYs at lower costs. One-year lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT also resulted in higher QALYs and lower costs than no maintenance, while continuous lenalidomide had an ICER of 396,731 CNY/QALY.

Conclusions: Under the WTP threshold of CNY 268,074 per QALY, ASCT strategies were more cost-effective than non-ASCT approaches. One-year lenalidomide therapy after ASCT was more cost-effective than no maintenance or continuous therapy. Among all strategies, ASCT followed by two years of daratumumab maintenance was the most cost-effective option.

研究背景本研究旨在从中国医疗保健的角度,评估对符合移植条件的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者实施ASCT和维持治疗策略的成本效益:研究设计:建立了短期决策树和长期马尔可夫模型,以评估ASCT和维持治疗在一生中的平均成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。效用值来源于已发表的文献,而医疗成本则基于单中心回顾性分析和国家药品招标数据:结果:采用达拉单抗维持治疗两年的ASCT策略的贴现成本最低(1,394,183元人民币)。与不进行持续来那度胺维持治疗的ASCT相比,ASCT的ICER为90,997元人民币/QALY。在来那度胺维持治疗一年的情况下,ASCT以更低的成本提供了更多的QALY。与不维持治疗相比,ASCT后维持一年的来那度胺治疗也能带来更高的QALYs和更低的成本,而持续来那度胺治疗的ICER为396,731元人民币/QALY:结论:在每QALY 268,074元人民币的WTP阈值下,ASCT疗法比非ASCT疗法更具成本效益。ASCT后一年的来那度胺治疗比不维持治疗或持续治疗更具成本效益。在所有策略中,ASCT后再进行两年达拉曲单抗维持治疗是最具成本效益的方案。
{"title":"Autologous stem-cell transplantation and maintenance therapy for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Weijia Wu, Yannan Wang, Yingting Lou, Xiaoyuan Fan, Wenqianzi Yang, Fengyuan Tang, Zixuan Zhao, Hengjin Dong","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2461636","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2461636","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ASCT and maintenance therapy strategies for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma from a Chinese healthcare perspective.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A short-run decision tree and a long-run Markov model were created to assess the mean costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of ASCT plus maintenance therapy over a lifetime horizon. Utility values were sourced from published literature, while healthcare costs were based on a single-center retrospective analysis and national drug bidding data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ASCT strategy with two-year daratumumab maintenance had the lowest discounted costs (1,394,183 CNY). Compared to no ASCT with continuous lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT had an ICER of 90,997 CNY/QALY. With one-year lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT provided more QALYs at lower costs. One-year lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT also resulted in higher QALYs and lower costs than no maintenance, while continuous lenalidomide had an ICER of 396,731 CNY/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the WTP threshold of CNY 268,074 per QALY, ASCT strategies were more cost-effective than non-ASCT approaches. One-year lenalidomide therapy after ASCT was more cost-effective than no maintenance or continuous therapy. Among all strategies, ASCT followed by two years of daratumumab maintenance was the most cost-effective option.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143188816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medical oncologists' dance with international guidelines and national reimbursement: insights from a survey in Türkiye.
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2462238
Ozgur Tanriverdi, Melek Ozdemir, Emre Hafizoglu, Taliha Guclu, Elvina Almurodova, Sait Kitapli, Islam Cagri Bosna, Tugba Dubektas-Canbek, Utku Oflazoglu, Ali Alkan, Sabri Barutca

Background: This study explores Turkish medical oncologists' perceptions of integrating international treatment guidelines with national reimbursement policies, considering local legal, economic, and healthcare constraints.

Research design and methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from March 24-31, 2024, targeting all 1,096 active oncologists registered with the Turkish Medical Oncology Association, as these specialists are exclusively authorized to prescribe anticancer drugs under national regulations. The survey included 25 questions on demographics, perceptions of guidelines, and integration preferences. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, identified factors influencing guideline preferences.

Results: Among 337 respondents (31%), 94% found international guidelines essential, but 62% noted a lack of clear real-world algorithms. Significant predictors for preferring national guidelines included working in public institutions (OR: 3.90, p < 0.001), concerns about pharmaceutical industry influence (OR: 4.38, p = 0.017), legal challenges (OR: 5.89, p < 0.001), and variability among clinical research centers (OR: 2.95, p = 0.019). Despite these challenges, 57% favored national guidelines for their compatibility with local healthcare policies.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the need for hybrid models that merge the evidence-based rigor of international frameworks with local healthcare priorities. Such models can enhance equitable and effective cancer care in Türkiye by addressing both global standards and national realities.

{"title":"Medical oncologists' dance with international guidelines and national reimbursement: insights from a survey in Türkiye.","authors":"Ozgur Tanriverdi, Melek Ozdemir, Emre Hafizoglu, Taliha Guclu, Elvina Almurodova, Sait Kitapli, Islam Cagri Bosna, Tugba Dubektas-Canbek, Utku Oflazoglu, Ali Alkan, Sabri Barutca","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2462238","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2462238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explores Turkish medical oncologists' perceptions of integrating international treatment guidelines with national reimbursement policies, considering local legal, economic, and healthcare constraints.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from March 24-31, 2024, targeting all 1,096 active oncologists registered with the Turkish Medical Oncology Association, as these specialists are exclusively authorized to prescribe anticancer drugs under national regulations. The survey included 25 questions on demographics, perceptions of guidelines, and integration preferences. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, identified factors influencing guideline preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 337 respondents (31%), 94% found international guidelines essential, but 62% noted a lack of clear real-world algorithms. Significant predictors for preferring national guidelines included working in public institutions (OR: 3.90, <i>p</i> < 0.001), concerns about pharmaceutical industry influence (OR: 4.38, <i>p</i> = 0.017), legal challenges (OR: 5.89, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and variability among clinical research centers (OR: 2.95, <i>p</i> = 0.019). Despite these challenges, 57% favored national guidelines for their compatibility with local healthcare policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight the need for hybrid models that merge the evidence-based rigor of international frameworks with local healthcare priorities. Such models can enhance equitable and effective cancer care in Türkiye by addressing both global standards and national realities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143079210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-effectiveness of blood-based colorectal cancer screening - a simulation model incorporating real-world longitudinal adherence.
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2458044
Elifnur Yay Donderici, Shaun P Forbes, Nicole J Zhang, Gregory Schafer, Victoria M Raymond, Amar K Das, Craig Eagle, AmirAli Talasaz, William M Grady

Objectives: Although U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended CRC screenings are effective; patient reluctance reduces adherence. Most cost-effectiveness models assume perfect adherence, yet one-third of eligible individuals aren't current with CRC screening. Our study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Shield, an FDA-approved blood-based CRC screening test, using real-world adherence.

Methods: The CAN-SCREEN (Colorectal cANcer SCReening Economics and adherENce) model, a validated discrete-event simulation, evaluated clinical and economic outcomes of CRC screening under real-world adherence scenarios. We compared the Shield blood-based test administered every 3 years to no screening, considering it cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was under $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

Results: Shield increased QALYs by 154 and raised costs by $7.5 million per 1,000 individuals, with an ICER of $48,662 per QALY, meeting the $100,000/QALY threshold. Shield remained cost-effective up to a unit cost of $3,241 (at $100,000/QALY) and $4,942 (at $150,000/QALY). Sensitivity analyses confirmed cost-effectiveness with lower adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy (56.1%) and annual screenings.

Conclusion: The CAN-SCREEN model shows that Shield is cost-effective compared to no screening. Including real-world adherence improves accuracy in assessing screening strategies. Shield's noninvasive approach offers a promising, cost-effective way to increase adherence and reduce CRC mortality.

{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of blood-based colorectal cancer screening - a simulation model incorporating real-world longitudinal adherence.","authors":"Elifnur Yay Donderici, Shaun P Forbes, Nicole J Zhang, Gregory Schafer, Victoria M Raymond, Amar K Das, Craig Eagle, AmirAli Talasaz, William M Grady","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2458044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2458044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended CRC screenings are effective; patient reluctance reduces adherence. Most cost-effectiveness models assume perfect adherence, yet one-third of eligible individuals aren't current with CRC screening. Our study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Shield, an FDA-approved blood-based CRC screening test, using real-world adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CAN-SCREEN (Colorectal cANcer SCReening Economics and adherENce) model, a validated discrete-event simulation, evaluated clinical and economic outcomes of CRC screening under real-world adherence scenarios. We compared the Shield blood-based test administered every 3 years to no screening, considering it cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was under $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shield increased QALYs by 154 and raised costs by $7.5 million per 1,000 individuals, with an ICER of $48,662 per QALY, meeting the $100,000/QALY threshold. Shield remained cost-effective up to a unit cost of $3,241 (at $100,000/QALY) and $4,942 (at $150,000/QALY). Sensitivity analyses confirmed cost-effectiveness with lower adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy (56.1%) and annual screenings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CAN-SCREEN model shows that Shield is cost-effective compared to no screening. Including real-world adherence improves accuracy in assessing screening strategies. Shield's noninvasive approach offers a promising, cost-effective way to increase adherence and reduce CRC mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143079203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The hidden burden of atopic dermatitis in central and Eastern European countries. 中欧和东欧国家特应性皮炎的隐性负担。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2416249
Baher Elezbawy, Zoltán Kaló, Ahmad Fasseeh, András Inotai, Bertalan Nemeth, Tamás Ágh

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) imposes a hidden burden through its negative effects on quality of life and productivity. We aim to estimate this hidden burden in adults and adolescents in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries.

Methods: We created a burden of disease model to quantify AD's hidden burden. Humanistic burden was calculated by estimating the monetary value of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, using prevalence data from the Global Burden of Disease study and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita for each country. Indirect economic burden was estimated based on productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism, adjusted for labor force participation and unemployment rates. Total hidden burden was determined by combining productivity losses and QALYs lost.

Results: QALY loss due to AD ranged from 1,832 to 58,596 annually in CEE countries, equating to 38 million to approximately 1 billion Euros per country. Productivity losses ranged from 3.6 to 148.9 million Euros annually. The total hidden burden of AD represents 0.11% to 0.43% of the GDP.

Conclusions: Our estimates reflect significant differences in population size, prevalence, and economic strength among CEE countries. Adjusting findings to country-specific GDP provided insights into AD's true hidden burden, offering valuable information for decision-making.

背景:特应性皮炎(AD)对生活质量和生产率造成负面影响,从而带来隐性负担。我们旨在估算中东欧(CEE)国家成人和青少年的隐性负担:方法:我们创建了一个疾病负担模型来量化注意力缺失症的隐性负担。人文负担是通过估算质量调整生命年(QALYs)损失的货币价值来计算的,使用的是全球疾病负担研究(Global Burden of Disease study)的患病率数据和每个国家的人均国内生产总值(GDP)。间接经济负担是根据缺勤和旷工造成的生产力损失估算的,并根据劳动力参与率和失业率进行了调整。总的隐性负担由生产率损失和 QALYs 损失共同决定:中欧和东欧国家每年因急性营养不良造成的 QALY 损失从 1,832 到 58,596 不等,相当于每个国家 3800 万到约 10 亿欧元。生产力损失每年从 360 万欧元到 1.489 亿欧元不等。急性肠梗阻的隐性总负担占国内生产总值的 0.11% 至 0.43%:我们的估计结果反映了中欧和东欧国家在人口规模、发病率和经济实力方面的显著差异。根据具体国家的 GDP 对研究结果进行调整后,我们可以深入了解急性肠梗阻的真正隐性负担,为决策提供有价值的信息。
{"title":"The hidden burden of atopic dermatitis in central and Eastern European countries.","authors":"Baher Elezbawy, Zoltán Kaló, Ahmad Fasseeh, András Inotai, Bertalan Nemeth, Tamás Ágh","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2416249","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2416249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) imposes a hidden burden through its negative effects on quality of life and productivity. We aim to estimate this hidden burden in adults and adolescents in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a burden of disease model to quantify AD's hidden burden. Humanistic burden was calculated by estimating the monetary value of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, using prevalence data from the Global Burden of Disease study and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita for each country. Indirect economic burden was estimated based on productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism, adjusted for labor force participation and unemployment rates. Total hidden burden was determined by combining productivity losses and QALYs lost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QALY loss due to AD ranged from 1,832 to 58,596 annually in CEE countries, equating to 38 million to approximately 1 billion Euros per country. Productivity losses ranged from 3.6 to 148.9 million Euros annually. The total hidden burden of AD represents 0.11% to 0.43% of the GDP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our estimates reflect significant differences in population size, prevalence, and economic strength among CEE countries. Adjusting findings to country-specific GDP provided insights into AD's true hidden burden, offering valuable information for decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"257-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of prescriptive monitoring regarding the current therapeutic landscape of rheumatoid arthritis: the experience of an Italian local health authority. 分析类风湿性关节炎当前疗法的规范性监测:意大利地方卫生机构的经验。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2411431
Francesco Ferrara, Andrea Zovi, Roberto Langella, Ugo Trama, Eduardo Nava, Francesco Comentale, Ferdinando Primiano, Giuseppe Russo, Maurizio Capuozzo

Introduction: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is among the most prevalent chronic inflammatory diseases affecting millions of people with a significant expenditure of resources by National Healthcare Systems. This study aimed to analyze all available treatments exclusively for RA to highlight the costs of each treatment type and raise awareness of the use of biosimilar drugs.

Methods: In an Italian healthcare authority, all prescriptions made for the diagnosis of RA were extracted to verify consumption expressed in Defined Daily Dose (DDD) and the expenditure incurred expressed in euros. Consequently, a grouping into three major drug categories has been performed: anti - tumor necrosis factor alpha agents (TNFα), other injectable formulations, and novel oral formulations.

Results: Prescriptions for the second half-year 2022 and 2023 have been analyzed, with a total cost of almost 7 million euros in the sample considered. All pharmaceutical categories showed an increase in consumption, but only anti- TNFα recorded a decrease in costs from 25% in 2022 to 22% in 2023, thanks to the lower cost of the biosimilar drug.

Conclusion: The costs of RA may represent a significant spending commitment for central governments. As a result, actions are needed to encourage the preferential use of biosimilar drugs.

导言:类风湿关节炎(RA)是最普遍的慢性炎症性疾病之一,影响着数百万人,耗费了国家医疗系统的大量资源。本研究旨在分析所有专门针对类风湿关节炎的现有治疗方法,以突出每种治疗方法的成本,并提高人们对使用生物类似药的认识:方法:在意大利的一家医疗机构中,提取了所有诊断为 RA 的处方,以核实以定义日剂量(DDD)表示的消耗量和以欧元表示的支出。因此,我们将药物分为三大类:抗肿瘤坏死因子α制剂(TNFα)、其他注射剂和新型口服制剂:对 2022 年和 2023 年下半年的处方进行了分析,样本中的总费用接近 700 万欧元。所有药品类别的消费都有所增加,但只有抗 TNFα 的费用从 2022 年的 25% 降至 2023 年的 22%,这要归功于生物仿制药的低成本:结论:对于中央政府来说,RA 的费用可能是一笔巨大的开支。因此,需要采取行动鼓励优先使用生物类似药。
{"title":"Analysis of prescriptive monitoring regarding the current therapeutic landscape of rheumatoid arthritis: the experience of an Italian local health authority.","authors":"Francesco Ferrara, Andrea Zovi, Roberto Langella, Ugo Trama, Eduardo Nava, Francesco Comentale, Ferdinando Primiano, Giuseppe Russo, Maurizio Capuozzo","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2411431","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2411431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is among the most prevalent chronic inflammatory diseases affecting millions of people with a significant expenditure of resources by National Healthcare Systems. This study aimed to analyze all available treatments exclusively for RA to highlight the costs of each treatment type and raise awareness of the use of biosimilar drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an Italian healthcare authority, all prescriptions made for the diagnosis of RA were extracted to verify consumption expressed in Defined Daily Dose (DDD) and the expenditure incurred expressed in euros. Consequently, a grouping into three major drug categories has been performed: anti - tumor necrosis factor alpha agents (TNFα), other injectable formulations, and novel oral formulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prescriptions for the second half-year 2022 and 2023 have been analyzed, with a total cost of almost 7 million euros in the sample considered. All pharmaceutical categories showed an increase in consumption, but only anti- TNFα recorded a decrease in costs from 25% in 2022 to 22% in 2023, thanks to the lower cost of the biosimilar drug.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The costs of RA may represent a significant spending commitment for central governments. As a result, actions are needed to encourage the preferential use of biosimilar drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-utility analysis of duloxetine in osteoarthritis: from Chinese healthcare perspective. 从中国医疗保健的角度分析度洛西汀治疗骨关节炎的成本效用。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2410973
Xueshan Sun, Xuemei Zhen, Shuyan Gu, Kaijie Liu, Wenqianzi Yang, Hengjin Dong

Objectives: To estimate the cost-utility of duloxetine compared with that of a placebo, common traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) from a Chinese healthcare perspective.

Methods: A Markov model was constructed. The costs and utility inputs were obtained from the database and published literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the main model outputs. Subgroup analyses were also conducted for patients at high risk of gastrointestinal (GI) or cardiovascular (CV) AEs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: The model estimated an ICER of $3409.21/QALY for duloxetine compared with etoricoxib, with duloxetine dominating other active treatment strategies in patients at a low risk of GI and CV AEs. The ICER for duloxetine over etoricoxib was $322.21/QALY in patients at high risk of GI and CV AEs. These results were consistent with the sensitivity analyses; 53.64% and 53.93% of the patients were willing to use duloxetine comparing with etoricoxib, for which the thresholds were 1.0 and 3.0 per capita gross domestic product (GDP), respectively.

Conclusions: Duloxetine is a valuable option for patients with OA; however, uncertainties exist in the model, and these suggestions can be adopted with caution.

研究目的从中国医疗保健的角度估算度洛西汀与安慰剂、普通传统非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂治疗骨关节炎(OA)的成本效用:方法:建立马尔可夫模型。方法:构建马尔可夫模型,从数据库和已发表文献中获取成本和效用输入。增量成本效益比(ICER)是模型的主要输出结果。还对胃肠道(GI)或心血管(CV)AE 高风险患者进行了分组分析。还进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析:该模型估计,与依托考昔相比,度洛西汀的ICER为3409.21美元/QALY,在胃肠道和心血管AE风险较低的患者中,度洛西汀主导其他积极治疗策略。在消化道和心血管意外伤害高风险患者中,度洛西汀与依托考昔相比的ICER为322.21美元/QALY。这些结果与敏感性分析一致;与依托昔布相比,53.64%和53.93%的患者愿意使用度洛西汀,而依托昔布的阈值分别为人均国内生产总值(GDP)的1.0和3.0:度洛西汀对 OA 患者来说是一种有价值的选择;然而,模型中还存在不确定性,因此可以谨慎采纳这些建议。
{"title":"Cost-utility analysis of duloxetine in osteoarthritis: from Chinese healthcare perspective.","authors":"Xueshan Sun, Xuemei Zhen, Shuyan Gu, Kaijie Liu, Wenqianzi Yang, Hengjin Dong","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2410973","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2410973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the cost-utility of duloxetine compared with that of a placebo, common traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) from a Chinese healthcare perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model was constructed. The costs and utility inputs were obtained from the database and published literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the main model outputs. Subgroup analyses were also conducted for patients at high risk of gastrointestinal (GI) or cardiovascular (CV) AEs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model estimated an ICER of $3409.21/QALY for duloxetine compared with etoricoxib, with duloxetine dominating other active treatment strategies in patients at a low risk of GI and CV AEs. The ICER for duloxetine over etoricoxib was $322.21/QALY in patients at high risk of GI and CV AEs. These results were consistent with the sensitivity analyses; 53.64% and 53.93% of the patients were willing to use duloxetine comparing with etoricoxib, for which the thresholds were 1.0 and 3.0 per capita gross domestic product (GDP), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Duloxetine is a valuable option for patients with OA; however, uncertainties exist in the model, and these suggestions can be adopted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"245-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1