Marginalized voices: a qualitative exploration of multilevel environmental barriers to assistive technology use among hispanics.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852
Angélica M Martínez Pérez, Fabricio E Balcazar, Elsa M Orellano-Colón
{"title":"Marginalized voices: a qualitative exploration of multilevel environmental barriers to assistive technology use among hispanics.","authors":"Angélica M Martínez Pérez, Fabricio E Balcazar, Elsa M Orellano-Colón","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assistive technology (AT) can increase or maintain the quality of life and overall well-being of people with disabilities. Nevertheless, access to AT is limited among Hispanics with disabilities in the United States (U.S.). AT research representing the experiences of Hispanics is limited, potentially leading to disparities in AT use. Moreover, poor inclusion of Hispanics neglects the needs of this population, resulting in discrepancies in research, practice, and policy related to AT. To address these limitations, this study aimed to identify and explore multilevel environmental barriers to AT use among a sample of Hispanics in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive qualitative research design study guided by the Social Ecological Model framework using in-depth interviews to collect data. Nine Hispanic individuals with disabilities and their caregivers who received AT services at the University of Illinois at Chicago Assistive Technology Unit outpatient clinic were interviewed. Data was analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to AT use were found to exist in all levels of the Social Ecological Model. The most common barriers to AT use were identified in the community domain, which was related to the lack of AT information, and in the societal domain, which was related to sociocultural norms and the availability of AT funding, policies, and regulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The participants' lived experiences and perspectives underscored that environmental barriers to AT use are not isolated occurrences; rather, systemic attitudes permeate across all levels of the Social Ecological Model.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Assistive technology (AT) can increase or maintain the quality of life and overall well-being of people with disabilities. Nevertheless, access to AT is limited among Hispanics with disabilities in the United States (U.S.). AT research representing the experiences of Hispanics is limited, potentially leading to disparities in AT use. Moreover, poor inclusion of Hispanics neglects the needs of this population, resulting in discrepancies in research, practice, and policy related to AT. To address these limitations, this study aimed to identify and explore multilevel environmental barriers to AT use among a sample of Hispanics in the U.S.

Methods: This was a descriptive qualitative research design study guided by the Social Ecological Model framework using in-depth interviews to collect data. Nine Hispanic individuals with disabilities and their caregivers who received AT services at the University of Illinois at Chicago Assistive Technology Unit outpatient clinic were interviewed. Data was analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach.

Results: Barriers to AT use were found to exist in all levels of the Social Ecological Model. The most common barriers to AT use were identified in the community domain, which was related to the lack of AT information, and in the societal domain, which was related to sociocultural norms and the availability of AT funding, policies, and regulations.

Conclusions: The participants' lived experiences and perspectives underscored that environmental barriers to AT use are not isolated occurrences; rather, systemic attitudes permeate across all levels of the Social Ecological Model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被边缘化的声音:对西班牙裔使用辅助技术的多层次环境障碍的定性探索。
目的:辅助技术(AT)可以提高或维持残疾人的生活质量和整体福祉。然而,在美国,西班牙裔残疾人获得辅助技术的机会有限。代表西班牙裔残疾人经历的辅助器具研究十分有限,这可能会导致他们在使用辅助器具方面的差异。此外,对拉美裔的忽略也忽视了这一群体的需求,导致与辅助器具相关的研究、实践和政策出现偏差。为了解决这些局限性,本研究旨在确定并探讨美国西班牙裔样本中使用辅助器具的多层次环境障碍:本研究是一项描述性定性研究设计,以社会生态模型框架为指导,采用深入访谈的方式收集数据。研究人员采访了在伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校辅助技术部门诊接受辅助技术服务的九名西班牙裔残疾人及其照顾者。采用定性主题分析方法对数据进行了分析:结果发现,使用辅助器具的障碍存在于社会生态模型的各个层面。使用辅助器具最常见的障碍出现在社区领域和社会领域,前者与缺乏辅助器具信息有关,后者则与社会文化规范以及辅助器具资金、政策和法规的可用性有关:结论:参与者的生活经历和观点强调,使用辅助器具的环境障碍并不是孤立存在的;相反,系统性的态度渗透到社会生态模型的各个层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Skills on wheels: caregiver perspectives on the design and long-term impact of a pediatric wheelchair Skills training program. Outcome measurement of cognitive impairment and dementia in serious digital games: a scoping review. Evaluating multi-channel interaction design for enhancing Pose accuracy in yoga training among visually impaired individuals. Validity of a wrist-worn consumer-grade wearable for estimating energy expenditure, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. How does moderate upper limb activity modify sitting forces for able-bodied persons and wheelchair users?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1