Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection With and Without Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1177/15385744241276648
Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, Leopoldo Marine, Francisco Valdes, Jose Francisco Vargas, Michel Bergoeing, Renato Mertens
{"title":"Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection With and Without Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.","authors":"Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, Leopoldo Marine, Francisco Valdes, Jose Francisco Vargas, Michel Bergoeing, Renato Mertens","doi":"10.1177/15385744241276648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to report the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients treated for IAAD with and without abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a single academic institution in South America.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all patients with IAAD with or without concomitant AAA between January 2002 and December 2023 from a single academic hospital was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients with IAAD were diagnosed of whom 13 (72.2%) were males. Median age was 63 years (range: 43-88 years). Sixteen (88.8%) patients presented with symptoms, and in two (11.1%) asymptomatic patients IAAD was an incidental finding. Ten (55.5%) patients had concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), with a median size of the aneurysm of 49.5 mm (range: 44-66 mm). No statistical differences in baseline characteristics were seen between patients with concomitant IAAD and AAA and patients with only IAAD. Seven (38.8%) patients presented chronic dissection, and 11 (61.1%) patients had acute dissection. Five (27.7%) patients were treated conservatively with blood pressure, pain control, and antiplatelets; endovascular surgery was performed in eight (44.4%) patients and open surgery in five (27.7%) patients. The complication rate was 22.2% (n = 4), and the mortality rate was 0%. Median follow-up was 36 months (range: 6-240 months). Complete remodeling was seen in all patients except two patients who underwent conservative treatment. Of those, one had partial remodeling, and the other no changed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Isolated aortic dissection of the abdominal aorta is an uncommon condition, with acceptable different treatment strategies, from conservative to invasive treatments. Sometimes IAAD can concur with AAA, and when so, invasive treatment might be considered. More studies describing the natural history of AAA and its association with IAAD are warranted, as well as further research reporting long-term outcomes on aortic remodeling after different treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241276648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to report the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients treated for IAAD with and without abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a single academic institution in South America.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all patients with IAAD with or without concomitant AAA between January 2002 and December 2023 from a single academic hospital was performed.

Results: Eighteen patients with IAAD were diagnosed of whom 13 (72.2%) were males. Median age was 63 years (range: 43-88 years). Sixteen (88.8%) patients presented with symptoms, and in two (11.1%) asymptomatic patients IAAD was an incidental finding. Ten (55.5%) patients had concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), with a median size of the aneurysm of 49.5 mm (range: 44-66 mm). No statistical differences in baseline characteristics were seen between patients with concomitant IAAD and AAA and patients with only IAAD. Seven (38.8%) patients presented chronic dissection, and 11 (61.1%) patients had acute dissection. Five (27.7%) patients were treated conservatively with blood pressure, pain control, and antiplatelets; endovascular surgery was performed in eight (44.4%) patients and open surgery in five (27.7%) patients. The complication rate was 22.2% (n = 4), and the mortality rate was 0%. Median follow-up was 36 months (range: 6-240 months). Complete remodeling was seen in all patients except two patients who underwent conservative treatment. Of those, one had partial remodeling, and the other no changed.

Conclusion: Isolated aortic dissection of the abdominal aorta is an uncommon condition, with acceptable different treatment strategies, from conservative to invasive treatments. Sometimes IAAD can concur with AAA, and when so, invasive treatment might be considered. More studies describing the natural history of AAA and its association with IAAD are warranted, as well as further research reporting long-term outcomes on aortic remodeling after different treatment modalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴有或不伴有腹主动脉瘤的孤立性腹主动脉夹层。
研究目的本研究的目的是报告南美洲一家学术机构收治的伴有或不伴有腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的IAAD患者的临床表现和治疗结果:对一家学术医院2002年1月至2023年12月期间所有伴有或不伴有腹主动脉瘤的IAAD患者进行回顾性研究:结果:18例IAAD患者被确诊,其中13例(72.2%)为男性。中位年龄为 63 岁(范围:43-88 岁)。16名(88.8%)患者有症状,2名(11.1%)无症状患者的IAAD是偶然发现的。10名患者(55.5%)同时患有腹主动脉瘤(AAA),动脉瘤的中位尺寸为49.5毫米(范围:44-66毫米)。同时患有 IAAD 和 AAA 的患者与仅患有 IAAD 的患者在基线特征方面没有统计学差异。7例(38.8%)患者为慢性夹层,11例(61.1%)患者为急性夹层。5名患者(27.7%)接受了保守治疗,包括降压、止痛和抗血小板治疗;8名患者(44.4%)接受了血管内手术,5名患者(27.7%)接受了开放手术。并发症发生率为 22.2%(4 例),死亡率为 0%。中位随访时间为 36 个月(6-240 个月)。除了两名接受保守治疗的患者外,所有患者都出现了完全重塑。结论:结论:腹主动脉孤立性夹层是一种不常见的疾病,可接受不同的治疗策略,从保守治疗到侵入性治疗。有时,IAAD 可合并 AAA,此时可考虑进行侵入性治疗。有必要开展更多研究,描述 AAA 的自然病史及其与 IAAD 的关联,并进一步研究报告不同治疗方法后主动脉重塑的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Popliteal Vein Entrapment as a Rare Form of Popliteal Entrapment Syndrome. Challenging Conventional Treatment: Retrograde Implantation of a Covered Stent in Superior Mensenteric Artery Occlusion Case. Smaller Hospital Size is Associated With Higher Mortality in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. Acute Vascular Complications of VA-ECMO in COVID-19 Patients. Does COVID-19 Affect the Outcome? Gender-Specific Long-Term Results After Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Depending on the Site of Distal Anastomosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1