On the Move in the community: Protocol for a hybrid 1 trial examining effectiveness and fidelity of a community-based group exercise program for older adults

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107666
Jennifer S. Brach , Jessie M. VanSwearingen , Janet Freburger , Bryan J. Weiner , John J. Zanardelli , Subashan Perera
{"title":"On the Move in the community: Protocol for a hybrid 1 trial examining effectiveness and fidelity of a community-based group exercise program for older adults","authors":"Jennifer S. Brach ,&nbsp;Jessie M. VanSwearingen ,&nbsp;Janet Freburger ,&nbsp;Bryan J. Weiner ,&nbsp;John J. Zanardelli ,&nbsp;Subashan Perera","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>On the Move (OTM), a group exercise program to improve mobility in older adults, is efficacious when delivered by research staff. The next step in the development of OTM as a fully implementable intervention is to conduct an effectiveness study in which the intervention is delivered in community settings by community providers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We describe the methods of a hybrid 1 cluster randomized, single-blind, intervention trial to compare the effectiveness of OTM to a delayed intervention control in 502 community-dwelling older adults across 44 sites. OTM classes are taught by certified instructors in the community twice a week for 12 weeks. Control centers receive no intervention for the first 12 weeks followed by 12-weeks of OTM classes. Participants are assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome is gait speed. Intervention fidelity, measured by adherence and competence in intervention delivery, is assessed by review of instructor intervention diaries and observation. Organizational, instructor, and participant-level factors which may impact fidelity are assessed using questionnaires, focus groups, and structured interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings of this trial will 1) establish the effectiveness of OTM on improvements in walking and post-intervention persistence of benefits, 2) assess intervention fidelity and identify the impact of organizational, instructor, and participant level factors on fidelity, and 3) determine the extent to which fidelity moderates the effectiveness of OTM. The information derived from this project will provide valuable insight into the real-world effectiveness of OTM as a health promotion program for improving mobility in older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 107666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002490/pdfft?md5=06c46f22bb656e23a5b2dbe0973ef37e&pid=1-s2.0-S1551714424002490-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

On the Move (OTM), a group exercise program to improve mobility in older adults, is efficacious when delivered by research staff. The next step in the development of OTM as a fully implementable intervention is to conduct an effectiveness study in which the intervention is delivered in community settings by community providers.

Methods

We describe the methods of a hybrid 1 cluster randomized, single-blind, intervention trial to compare the effectiveness of OTM to a delayed intervention control in 502 community-dwelling older adults across 44 sites. OTM classes are taught by certified instructors in the community twice a week for 12 weeks. Control centers receive no intervention for the first 12 weeks followed by 12-weeks of OTM classes. Participants are assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome is gait speed. Intervention fidelity, measured by adherence and competence in intervention delivery, is assessed by review of instructor intervention diaries and observation. Organizational, instructor, and participant-level factors which may impact fidelity are assessed using questionnaires, focus groups, and structured interviews.

Conclusion

The findings of this trial will 1) establish the effectiveness of OTM on improvements in walking and post-intervention persistence of benefits, 2) assess intervention fidelity and identify the impact of organizational, instructor, and participant level factors on fidelity, and 3) determine the extent to which fidelity moderates the effectiveness of OTM. The information derived from this project will provide valuable insight into the real-world effectiveness of OTM as a health promotion program for improving mobility in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社区中运动:针对老年人的社区集体锻炼计划的有效性和忠实性的混合 1 试验方案。
背景:行动起来(OTM)是一项旨在改善老年人行动能力的集体锻炼计划,由研究人员实施效果显著。要将 "动起来 "发展成为一项可全面实施的干预措施,下一步是开展一项有效性研究,由社区服务人员在社区环境中实施干预措施:我们介绍了一项混合 1 组随机、单盲干预试验的方法,该试验比较了 OTM 与延迟干预对照的有效性,试验对象是 44 个地点的 502 名居住在社区的老年人。OTM 课程由经过认证的讲师在社区教授,每周两次,为期 12 周。对照中心在最初的 12 周内不接受任何干预,然后再接受为期 12 周的 OTM 课程。参与者在基线、12 周和 24 周时接受评估。主要结果是步速。干预的忠实度由干预实施的坚持度和能力来衡量,通过查看指导员干预日记和观察进行评估。使用问卷、焦点小组和结构化访谈对可能影响忠实度的组织、指导者和参与者层面的因素进行评估:本试验的结果将:1)确定 OTM 在改善步行和干预后持续获益方面的有效性;2)评估干预的忠实性,并确定组织、指导者和参与者层面的因素对忠实性的影响;3)确定忠实性在多大程度上调节了 OTM 的有效性。从该项目中获得的信息将为我们深入了解 OTM 作为健康促进项目在改善老年人行动能力方面的实际效果提供宝贵的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Integrative data analysis of clinical trials network studies to examine the impact of psychosocial treatments for Black people who use cocaine: Study protocol' [Contemporary Clinical Trials 133 (2023) 107329]. A new way to address missing data in late-stage clinical trials. A peer support intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP randomized pilot trial design and methods outline. An evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) in a youth outpatient eating disorders service: A protocol paper. Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1