Progression and perceptual responses to blood flow restriction resistance training among people with multiple sclerosis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05584-2
Ethan C Hill, Jeffrey T Schmidt, Kyle R Reedy, Sean M Lubiak, Chris E Proppe, Paola M Rivera, David H Gonzalez-Rojas, John E Lawson, Anuj J Prajapati, Niriham M Shah, Nihar N Patel, Andrew M Guirgis, Abner-Alexander Silverio, Mason A Howard, Hwan Choi, Joshua L Keller
{"title":"Progression and perceptual responses to blood flow restriction resistance training among people with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Ethan C Hill, Jeffrey T Schmidt, Kyle R Reedy, Sean M Lubiak, Chris E Proppe, Paola M Rivera, David H Gonzalez-Rojas, John E Lawson, Anuj J Prajapati, Niriham M Shah, Nihar N Patel, Andrew M Guirgis, Abner-Alexander Silverio, Mason A Howard, Hwan Choi, Joshua L Keller","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05584-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Resistance exercise can attenuate muscular impairments associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), and blood flow restriction (BFR) may provide a viable alternative to prescribing heavy training loads. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the progression of upper and lower body low-load (30% of one-repetition maximum [1RM]) resistance training (RT) with BFR applied intermittently during the exercise intervals (RT + BFR) versus volume-matched heavy-load (65% of 1RM) RT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men and women with MS (n = 16) were randomly assigned to low-load RT + BFR (applied intermittently) or heavy-load RT and completed 12 weeks (2 × /week) of RT that consisted of bilateral chest press, seated row, shoulder press, leg press, leg extension, and leg curl exercises. Exercise load, tonnage, and rating of perceived exertion were assessed at baseline and every 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Training load increased to a greater extent and sometimes earlier for RT + BFR (57.7-106.3%) than heavy-load RT (42.3-54.3%) during chest press, seated row, and leg curl exercises, while there were similar increases (63.5-101.1%) for shoulder press, leg extension, and leg press exercises. Exercise tonnage was greater across all exercises for RT + BFR than heavy-load RT, although tonnage only increased during the chest press (70.7-80.0%) and leg extension (89.1%) exercises. Perceptions of exertion (4.8-7.2 au) and compliance (97.9-99.0%) were similar for both interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The training-induced increases in load, high compliance, and moderate levels of exertion suggested that RT + BFR and heavy-load RT are viable interventions among people with MS. RT + BFR may be a preferred modality if heavy loads are not well tolerated and/or to promote early-phase training responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05584-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Resistance exercise can attenuate muscular impairments associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), and blood flow restriction (BFR) may provide a viable alternative to prescribing heavy training loads. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the progression of upper and lower body low-load (30% of one-repetition maximum [1RM]) resistance training (RT) with BFR applied intermittently during the exercise intervals (RT + BFR) versus volume-matched heavy-load (65% of 1RM) RT.

Methods: Men and women with MS (n = 16) were randomly assigned to low-load RT + BFR (applied intermittently) or heavy-load RT and completed 12 weeks (2 × /week) of RT that consisted of bilateral chest press, seated row, shoulder press, leg press, leg extension, and leg curl exercises. Exercise load, tonnage, and rating of perceived exertion were assessed at baseline and every 6 weeks.

Results: Training load increased to a greater extent and sometimes earlier for RT + BFR (57.7-106.3%) than heavy-load RT (42.3-54.3%) during chest press, seated row, and leg curl exercises, while there were similar increases (63.5-101.1%) for shoulder press, leg extension, and leg press exercises. Exercise tonnage was greater across all exercises for RT + BFR than heavy-load RT, although tonnage only increased during the chest press (70.7-80.0%) and leg extension (89.1%) exercises. Perceptions of exertion (4.8-7.2 au) and compliance (97.9-99.0%) were similar for both interventions.

Conclusion: The training-induced increases in load, high compliance, and moderate levels of exertion suggested that RT + BFR and heavy-load RT are viable interventions among people with MS. RT + BFR may be a preferred modality if heavy loads are not well tolerated and/or to promote early-phase training responses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症患者对血流限制阻力训练的进展和感知反应。
目的:阻力训练可减轻与多发性硬化症(MS)相关的肌肉损伤,而血流限制(BFR)可提供一种替代大负荷训练的可行方法。本研究的目的是研究在运动间歇期间间歇应用血流限制的上半身和下半身低负荷(一次重复最大运动量的 30%)阻力训练(RT)与运动量匹配的大负荷(一次重复最大运动量的 65%)阻力训练的进展情况:将患有多发性硬化症的男性和女性患者(n = 16)随机分配到低负荷 RT + BFR(间歇应用)或大负荷 RT,并完成为期 12 周(2 × /周)的 RT,其中包括双侧胸推,坐姿划船,肩部推举,腿部推举,腿部伸展和腿部卷曲练习。在基线期和每 6 周对运动负荷、肌肉强度和感觉用力程度进行评估:在胸外按压、坐姿划船和卷腿练习中,RT + BFR(57.7%-106.3%)比大负荷 RT(42.3%-54.3%)的训练负荷增加得更多,有时也更早;而在肩部按压、腿部伸展和腿部按压练习中,训练负荷增加的幅度(63.5%-101.1%)相似。与大负荷 RT 相比,RT + BFR 在所有运动中的运动吨位都更大,但吨位仅在胸推运动(70.7-80.0%)和腿部伸展运动(89.1%)中有所增加。两种干预方法的用力感(4.8-7.2 au)和顺应性(97.9-99.0%)相似:训练引起的负荷增加、高顺应性和中等程度的用力表明,RT + BFR 和大负荷 RT 是对多发性硬化症患者进行干预的可行方法。如果不能很好地耐受大负荷和/或为了促进早期阶段的训练反应,RT + BFR可能是一种首选方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
期刊最新文献
Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) from a submaximal 20-m shuttle-run test accurately predict children's VO2peak, but when should we stop the test? The effects of exercise, heat-induced hypo-hydration and rehydration on blood-brain-barrier permeability, corticospinal and peripheral excitability. Detrended fluctuation analysis to determine physiologic thresholds, investigation and evidence from incremental cycling test. Mechanical power distribution of the lower limbs changed during intermittent 300 countermovement jumps. Environmental study and stress-related biomarkers modifications in a crew during analog astronaut mission EMMPOL 6.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1