Satisfaction of Patients and Physicians with Telehealth Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Healthcare Informatics Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.206
Lida Fadaizadeh, Farnia Velayati, Morteza Arab-Zozani
{"title":"Satisfaction of Patients and Physicians with Telehealth Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lida Fadaizadeh, Farnia Velayati, Morteza Arab-Zozani","doi":"10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed significant challenges to healthcare systems, prompting the widespread adoption of telehealth to provide medical services while minimizing the risk of virus transmission. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction rates of both patients and physicians with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2023. We included studies that utilized telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and reported satisfaction data for both patients and physicians. Data extraction was performed using a form designed by the researchers. A meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models with the OpenMeta-Analyst software. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of telehealth services used: telephone, video, and a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial pool of 1,454 articles, 62 met the inclusion criteria for this study. The most commonly used methods were video and telephone calls. The overall satisfaction rate with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was 81%. Satisfaction rates were higher among patients at 83%, compared to 74% among physicians. Specifically, telephone consultations had a satisfaction rate of 77%, video consultations 86%, and a mix of both methods yielded a 77% satisfaction rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was considered satisfactory, with both patients and physicians reporting high levels of satisfaction. Telehealth has proven to be an effective alternative for delivering healthcare services during pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":"30 3","pages":"206-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed significant challenges to healthcare systems, prompting the widespread adoption of telehealth to provide medical services while minimizing the risk of virus transmission. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction rates of both patients and physicians with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Searches were conducted in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2023. We included studies that utilized telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and reported satisfaction data for both patients and physicians. Data extraction was performed using a form designed by the researchers. A meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models with the OpenMeta-Analyst software. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of telehealth services used: telephone, video, and a combination of both.

Results: From an initial pool of 1,454 articles, 62 met the inclusion criteria for this study. The most commonly used methods were video and telephone calls. The overall satisfaction rate with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was 81%. Satisfaction rates were higher among patients at 83%, compared to 74% among physicians. Specifically, telephone consultations had a satisfaction rate of 77%, video consultations 86%, and a mix of both methods yielded a 77% satisfaction rate.

Conclusions: Overall, satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was considered satisfactory, with both patients and physicians reporting high levels of satisfaction. Telehealth has proven to be an effective alternative for delivering healthcare services during pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间患者和医生对远程医疗服务的满意度:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的:冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的迅速传播给医疗保健系统带来了巨大挑战,促使人们广泛采用远程医疗来提供医疗服务,同时将病毒传播的风险降至最低。本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行期间患者和医生对远程医疗的满意度:从 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 1 日,我们在 Web of Science、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了搜索。我们纳入了在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用远程医疗并报告了患者和医生满意度数据的研究。数据提取使用研究人员设计的表格进行。使用 OpenMeta-Analyst 软件的随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。根据所使用的远程医疗服务类型进行了分组分析:电话、视频以及两者的结合:在最初的 1454 篇文章中,有 62 篇符合本研究的纳入标准。最常用的方法是视频和电话通话。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗的总体满意率为 81%。患者的满意度较高,达到 83%,而医生的满意度为 74%。具体来说,电话咨询的满意率为 77%,视频咨询为 86%,两种方法混合使用的满意率为 77%:总体而言,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗的满意度令人满意,患者和医生的满意度都很高。事实证明,远程医疗是大流行期间提供医疗保健服务的有效替代方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Informatics Research
Healthcare Informatics Research MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Implementation of the Digital Health Approach to Support Learning for Health Students Based on Bloom's Taxonomy: A Systematic Review. Mapping Drug Terms via Integration of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation Algorithm with a Large Language Model. Milestones and Growth: The 30-Year Journey of Healthcare Informatics Research. Mobile Application for Digital Health Coaching in the Self-Management of Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Development and Usability Study. Nursing Records Regarding Decision-Making in Cancer Supportive Care: A Retrospective Study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1