John R M Renwick, Nicholas Preobrazenski, Zeyu Wu, Ava Khansari, Matisse A LeBouedec, Jared M G Nuttall, Kyra R Bancroft, Nia Simpson-Stairs, Paul A Swinton, Brendon J Gurd
{"title":"Standard Deviation of Individual Response for VO<sub>2max</sub> Following Exercise Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"John R M Renwick, Nicholas Preobrazenski, Zeyu Wu, Ava Khansari, Matisse A LeBouedec, Jared M G Nuttall, Kyra R Bancroft, Nia Simpson-Stairs, Paul A Swinton, Brendon J Gurd","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02089-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although numerous attempts to demonstrate inter-individual differences in trainability across various outcomes have been unsuccessful, the investigation of maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2max</sub>) trainability warrants further study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate inter-individual differences in VO<sub>2max</sub> trainability across aerobic exercise training protocols utilizing non-exercising comparator groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search across three databases: EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS. The search strategy incorporated two main concepts: aerobic exercise training and VO<sub>2max</sub>. Studies were included if they used human participants, employed standardized and supervised exercise training, reported absolute or relative VO<sub>2max</sub>, included a non-exercise comparator group, reported VO<sub>2max</sub> change scores for non-exercise and exercise groups and provided the standard deviation (SD) of change for all groups. We calculated the SD of individual response (SD<sub>IR</sub>) to estimate the presence of inter-individual differences in trainability across all studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search generated 32,968 studies, 24 of which were included in the final analysis. Our findings indicated that (1) the majority of variation in observed change scores following an intervention is due to measurement error, (2) calculating SD<sub>IR</sub> within a single study would not yield sufficient accuracy of SD<sub>IR</sub> due to generally small sample sizes and (3) meta-analysis of <math><msubsup><mtext>SD</mtext> <mrow><mtext>IR</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </math> across studies does not provide strong evidence for a positive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated that there is not strong evidence supporting the existence of VO<sub>2max</sub> trainability across single interventions. As such, it appears unlikely that clinically relevant predictors of VO<sub>2max</sub> response will be discovered. Registration can be found online ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9VU3 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02089-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although numerous attempts to demonstrate inter-individual differences in trainability across various outcomes have been unsuccessful, the investigation of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) trainability warrants further study.
Objective: Our objective was to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate inter-individual differences in VO2max trainability across aerobic exercise training protocols utilizing non-exercising comparator groups.
Methods: We conducted a literature search across three databases: EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS. The search strategy incorporated two main concepts: aerobic exercise training and VO2max. Studies were included if they used human participants, employed standardized and supervised exercise training, reported absolute or relative VO2max, included a non-exercise comparator group, reported VO2max change scores for non-exercise and exercise groups and provided the standard deviation (SD) of change for all groups. We calculated the SD of individual response (SDIR) to estimate the presence of inter-individual differences in trainability across all studies.
Results: The literature search generated 32,968 studies, 24 of which were included in the final analysis. Our findings indicated that (1) the majority of variation in observed change scores following an intervention is due to measurement error, (2) calculating SDIR within a single study would not yield sufficient accuracy of SDIR due to generally small sample sizes and (3) meta-analysis of across studies does not provide strong evidence for a positive value.
Conclusion: Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated that there is not strong evidence supporting the existence of VO2max trainability across single interventions. As such, it appears unlikely that clinically relevant predictors of VO2max response will be discovered. Registration can be found online ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9VU3 ).
期刊介绍:
Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports.
Types of Articles:
Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings.
Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field.
Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles.
Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content.
Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances.
Peer Review Process:
All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.