Standard Deviation of Individual Response for VO2max Following Exercise Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s40279-024-02089-y
John R M Renwick, Nicholas Preobrazenski, Zeyu Wu, Ava Khansari, Matisse A LeBouedec, Jared M G Nuttall, Kyra R Bancroft, Nia Simpson-Stairs, Paul A Swinton, Brendon J Gurd
{"title":"Standard Deviation of Individual Response for VO<sub>2max</sub> Following Exercise Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"John R M Renwick, Nicholas Preobrazenski, Zeyu Wu, Ava Khansari, Matisse A LeBouedec, Jared M G Nuttall, Kyra R Bancroft, Nia Simpson-Stairs, Paul A Swinton, Brendon J Gurd","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02089-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although numerous attempts to demonstrate inter-individual differences in trainability across various outcomes have been unsuccessful, the investigation of maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2max</sub>) trainability warrants further study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate inter-individual differences in VO<sub>2max</sub> trainability across aerobic exercise training protocols utilizing non-exercising comparator groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search across three databases: EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS. The search strategy incorporated two main concepts: aerobic exercise training and VO<sub>2max</sub>. Studies were included if they used human participants, employed standardized and supervised exercise training, reported absolute or relative VO<sub>2max</sub>, included a non-exercise comparator group, reported VO<sub>2max</sub> change scores for non-exercise and exercise groups and provided the standard deviation (SD) of change for all groups. We calculated the SD of individual response (SD<sub>IR</sub>) to estimate the presence of inter-individual differences in trainability across all studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search generated 32,968 studies, 24 of which were included in the final analysis. Our findings indicated that (1) the majority of variation in observed change scores following an intervention is due to measurement error, (2) calculating SD<sub>IR</sub> within a single study would not yield sufficient accuracy of SD<sub>IR</sub> due to generally small sample sizes and (3) meta-analysis of <math><msubsup><mtext>SD</mtext> <mrow><mtext>IR</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msubsup> </math> across studies does not provide strong evidence for a positive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated that there is not strong evidence supporting the existence of VO<sub>2max</sub> trainability across single interventions. As such, it appears unlikely that clinically relevant predictors of VO<sub>2max</sub> response will be discovered. Registration can be found online ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9VU3 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02089-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although numerous attempts to demonstrate inter-individual differences in trainability across various outcomes have been unsuccessful, the investigation of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) trainability warrants further study.

Objective: Our objective was to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate inter-individual differences in VO2max trainability across aerobic exercise training protocols utilizing non-exercising comparator groups.

Methods: We conducted a literature search across three databases: EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS. The search strategy incorporated two main concepts: aerobic exercise training and VO2max. Studies were included if they used human participants, employed standardized and supervised exercise training, reported absolute or relative VO2max, included a non-exercise comparator group, reported VO2max change scores for non-exercise and exercise groups and provided the standard deviation (SD) of change for all groups. We calculated the SD of individual response (SDIR) to estimate the presence of inter-individual differences in trainability across all studies.

Results: The literature search generated 32,968 studies, 24 of which were included in the final analysis. Our findings indicated that (1) the majority of variation in observed change scores following an intervention is due to measurement error, (2) calculating SDIR within a single study would not yield sufficient accuracy of SDIR due to generally small sample sizes and (3) meta-analysis of SD IR 2 across studies does not provide strong evidence for a positive value.

Conclusion: Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated that there is not strong evidence supporting the existence of VO2max trainability across single interventions. As such, it appears unlikely that clinically relevant predictors of VO2max response will be discovered. Registration can be found online ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9VU3 ).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动干预后 VO2max 的个体反应标准偏差:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:尽管在各种结果中证明训练能力个体间差异的许多尝试都不成功,但对最大耗氧量(VO2max)训练能力的调查值得进一步研究:我们的目的是进行首次系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以评估利用非运动比较组的有氧运动训练方案在 VO2max 训练能力方面的个体间差异:我们在三个数据库中进行了文献检索:方法:我们在三个数据库中进行了文献检索:EMBASE、PubMed 和 SCOPUS。搜索策略包含两个主要概念:有氧运动训练和 VO2max。如果研究使用了人类参与者,采用了标准化和有监督的运动训练,报告了绝对或相对 VO2max,包含了非运动比较组,报告了非运动组和运动组的 VO2max 变化分数,并提供了所有组的变化标准差 (SD),则被纳入研究。我们计算了个体反应的标准差(SDIR),以估计所有研究中是否存在训练能力的个体间差异:结果:文献检索结果为 32,968 项研究,其中 24 项被纳入最终分析。我们的研究结果表明:(1) 干预后观察到的变化分数的大部分变化是由于测量误差造成的;(2) 由于样本量普遍较小,在单项研究中计算 SDIR 无法获得足够准确的 SDIR;(3) 对不同研究的 SD IR 2 进行荟萃分析并不能为正值提供有力的证据:总之,我们的荟萃分析表明,没有强有力的证据支持在单一干预措施中存在 VO2max 可训练性。因此,似乎不太可能发现与临床相关的 VO2max 反应预测因子。可在线注册 ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9VU3 )。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Guiding Evidence-Based Classification in Para Sporting Populations: A Systematic Review of Impairment Measures and Activity Limitations The Influence of Kinesiophobia on Time to Clinical Recovery in Collegiate Athletes with Concussion Acknowledgement to Referees and the Editorial Board. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy as a Tool to Characterize Exercise and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review. Associations Between Instrumented Mouthguard-Measured Head Acceleration Events and Post-Match Biomarkers of Astroglial and Axonal Injury in Male Amateur Australian Football Players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1