Identifying impaired mental health in diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0045
Line T Jakobsen, Anne Søjbjerg, Stinne E Rasmussen, Kaj S Christensen
{"title":"Identifying impaired mental health in diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice.","authors":"Line T Jakobsen, Anne Søjbjerg, Stinne E Rasmussen, Kaj S Christensen","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type two diabetes (T2D) is linked to impaired mental health. International guidelines emphasise the importance of including psychological aspects in diabetes care. Yet, no systematic approach has been implemented to assess mental health in patients with T2D in general practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the mental health of patients with T2D in general practice, and to investigate the effectiveness of asking patients about their well-being by using a single-item question compared to the WHO five-item Well-being Index (WHO-5).</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cross-sectional study, including 230 patients with T2D in Danish general practice from 1 May 2023 to 31 January 2024.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eligible patients were recruited at the annual chronic care consultation. They answered a single-item question on well-being and four validated measures of general well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and diabetes distress (PAID-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 32% of patients expressed symptoms of impaired mental health. Notably, the WHO-5 identified 53% of these patients, whereas only 12% was identified through the single-item question. Importantly, among the patients exhibiting symptoms of impaired mental health, those identified by the WHO-5 displayed statistically significantly lower mental health scores across all measures (except PAID-5) compared to those not identified by the WHO-5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with T2D in general practice are affected by mental health issues. Our findings indicate that a single-item question may not sufficiently detect these issues, highlighting the importance of incorporating tools like the WHO-5 to offer a more comprehensive approach in diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type two diabetes (T2D) is linked to impaired mental health. International guidelines emphasise the importance of including psychological aspects in diabetes care. Yet, no systematic approach has been implemented to assess mental health in patients with T2D in general practice.

Aim: To evaluate the mental health of patients with T2D in general practice, and to investigate the effectiveness of asking patients about their well-being by using a single-item question compared to the WHO five-item Well-being Index (WHO-5).

Design & setting: Cross-sectional study, including 230 patients with T2D in Danish general practice from 1 May 2023 to 31 January 2024.

Method: Eligible patients were recruited at the annual chronic care consultation. They answered a single-item question on well-being and four validated measures of general well-being (WHO-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and diabetes distress (PAID-5).

Results: Overall, 32% of patients expressed symptoms of impaired mental health. Notably, the WHO-5 identified 53% of these patients, whereas only 12% was identified through the single-item question. Importantly, among the patients exhibiting symptoms of impaired mental health, those identified by the WHO-5 displayed statistically significantly lower mental health scores across all measures (except PAID-5) compared to those not identified by the WHO-5.

Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with T2D in general practice are affected by mental health issues. Our findings indicate that a single-item question may not sufficiently detect these issues, highlighting the importance of incorporating tools like the WHO-5 to offer a more comprehensive approach in diabetes care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别糖尿病患者受损的心理健康:全科医学横断面研究。
背景:二型糖尿病(T2D)与心理健康受损有关。国际指南强调了将心理问题纳入糖尿病护理的重要性。目的:评估全科医生中 T2D 患者的心理健康状况,并与世界卫生组织五项幸福指数(WHO-5)相比,研究通过单项问题询问患者幸福感的有效性:横断面研究,包括2023年5月1日至2024年1月31日期间在丹麦全科诊所就诊的230名T2D患者:方法:符合条件的患者在年度慢性病咨询中被招募。他们回答了一个有关幸福感的单项问题,以及四项经过验证的测量方法,包括一般幸福感(WHO-5)、抑郁(PHQ-9)、焦虑(GAD-7)和糖尿病困扰(PAID-5):结果:总体而言,32% 的患者表现出心理健康受损的症状。值得注意的是,WHO-5 发现了其中 53% 的患者,而通过单项问题仅发现了 12% 的患者。重要的是,在出现精神健康受损症状的患者中,与未被WHO-5识别的患者相比,被WHO-5识别的患者在所有测量指标(PAID-5除外)上的精神健康得分都明显较低:结论:在全科医生中,有相当一部分 T2D 患者受到心理健康问题的影响。我们的研究结果表明,单一项目的问题可能无法充分检测出这些问题,这凸显了结合 WHO-5 等工具在糖尿病护理中提供更全面方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exploring the facilitators and barriers to addressing social media's impact on anxiety within primary care: a qualitative study. Action on elevated natriuretic peptide in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study. 'ThinkCancer!': randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention. Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1