Physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents: a systematic review.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2024.2391787
Aaron Simpson, Samantha Teague, Benjamin Kramer, Ashleigh Lin, Ashleigh L Thornton, Timothy Budden, Bonnie Furzer, Ivan Jeftic, James Dimmock, Michael Rosenberg, Ben Jackson
{"title":"Physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents: a systematic review.","authors":"Aaron Simpson, Samantha Teague, Benjamin Kramer, Ashleigh Lin, Ashleigh L Thornton, Timothy Budden, Bonnie Furzer, Ivan Jeftic, James Dimmock, Michael Rosenberg, Ben Jackson","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2391787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many young people are exposed to risk factors that increase their risk of mental illness. Physical activity provision is an increasingly popular approach to protect against mental illness in the face of these risk factors. We examined the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents. We searched health databases for randomised and non-randomised intervention studies, with no date restriction, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. We present a narrative synthesis of our results accompanied with a summary of available effect sizes. Thirty-seven reports on 36 studies were included, with multi-sport or yoga interventions the most popular intervention approaches (a combined 50% of included studies). Outcomes measured included internalising, self-evaluative, wellbeing, overall symptomatology, resilience, externalising, and trauma outcomes. We found that 63% of between-groups effects favoured the intervention arm, and 83% of within-groups effects favoured an intervention effect. While recognising high risk of bias, our findings provide evidence in support of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for promoting mental health outcomes in at-risk young people. We encourage further work designed to better understand the intervention characteristics that may lead to positive benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"899-933"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2391787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many young people are exposed to risk factors that increase their risk of mental illness. Physical activity provision is an increasingly popular approach to protect against mental illness in the face of these risk factors. We examined the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents. We searched health databases for randomised and non-randomised intervention studies, with no date restriction, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. We present a narrative synthesis of our results accompanied with a summary of available effect sizes. Thirty-seven reports on 36 studies were included, with multi-sport or yoga interventions the most popular intervention approaches (a combined 50% of included studies). Outcomes measured included internalising, self-evaluative, wellbeing, overall symptomatology, resilience, externalising, and trauma outcomes. We found that 63% of between-groups effects favoured the intervention arm, and 83% of within-groups effects favoured an intervention effect. While recognising high risk of bias, our findings provide evidence in support of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for promoting mental health outcomes in at-risk young people. We encourage further work designed to better understand the intervention characteristics that may lead to positive benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为促进高危儿童和青少年心理健康成果而采取的体育活动干预措施:系统综述。
许多年轻人都面临着增加其罹患精神疾病风险的危险因素。面对这些风险因素,提供体育锻炼是一种越来越受欢迎的预防精神疾病的方法。我们研究了体育锻炼干预对促进高危儿童和青少年心理健康的有效性。我们在健康数据库中搜索了随机和非随机干预研究,没有日期限制,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了偏倚风险。我们对研究结果进行了叙述性综合,并附有可用效应大小摘要。共纳入了 36 项研究的 37 份报告,其中多种运动或瑜伽干预是最受欢迎的干预方法(共占纳入研究的 50%)。测量的结果包括内化、自我评价、幸福感、总体症状、复原力、外化和创伤结果。我们发现,63%的组间效应倾向于干预组,83%的组内效应倾向于干预效应。虽然我们认识到偏差风险很高,但我们的研究结果为体育锻炼干预对促进高危青少年心理健康成果的有效性提供了证据支持。我们鼓励进一步开展工作,以便更好地了解可能带来积极益处的干预特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based psychosocial interventions and psychological wellbeing in cancer survivorship: a meta-analysis. SWIPE: a conceptual, multi-perspective model for understanding and informing interventions for weight stigma in preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum. Tobacco use, trauma exposure and PTSD: a systematic review. Development of the social dimensions of health behaviour framework. App-based interventions to improve cancer outcomes rely on informational support from professionals: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1