Religious Involvement Is Associated With Higher Fertility and Lower Maternal Investment, but More Alloparental Support Among Gambian Mothers.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Human Biology Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1002/ajhb.24144
John H Shaver, Radim Chvaja, Laure Spake, Anushé Hassan, Jainaba Badjie, Andrew M Prentice, Carla Cerami, Rebecca Sear, Mary K Shenk, Richard Sosis
{"title":"Religious Involvement Is Associated With Higher Fertility and Lower Maternal Investment, but More Alloparental Support Among Gambian Mothers.","authors":"John H Shaver, Radim Chvaja, Laure Spake, Anushé Hassan, Jainaba Badjie, Andrew M Prentice, Carla Cerami, Rebecca Sear, Mary K Shenk, Richard Sosis","doi":"10.1002/ajhb.24144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Human childrearing is cooperative, with women often able to achieve relatively high fertility through help from many individuals. Previous work has documented tremendous socioecological variation in who supports women in childrearing, but less is known about the intracultural correlates of variation in allomaternal support. In the highly religious, high-fertility setting of The Gambia, we studied whether religious mothers have more children and receive more support with their children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly sampled 395 mothers and 745 focal children enrolled in the Kiang West (The Gambia) Longitudinal Population Study cohort. Structured interviews asked mothers who and how often people invest in their children, and about their religious practices. Data were collected at participants' homes on electronic tablet-based long-form surveys and analyzed using the Bayesian hierarchical models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Religiosity was weakly associated with women's higher age-adjusted fertility. Maternal religiosity was negatively related to maternal investment in focal children, but positively associated with total allomaternal support. Specifically, a woman's religiosity was positively associated with allomaternal support from matrilineal kin, other offspring, and affinal kin, but unrelated to paternal, patrilineal, and non-kin investment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that higher fertility among religious mothers may be supported by high levels of investment from biological and affinal kin. Matrilineal kin, other siblings, and affinal kin seem to be the most responsive to a woman's religiosity. Our findings cast doubt on interpretations of women's religious behaviors as signals of fidelity, and instead suggest they may be part of strategies to enable collective allomaternal resources and higher relative fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50809,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Human Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e24144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.24144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Human childrearing is cooperative, with women often able to achieve relatively high fertility through help from many individuals. Previous work has documented tremendous socioecological variation in who supports women in childrearing, but less is known about the intracultural correlates of variation in allomaternal support. In the highly religious, high-fertility setting of The Gambia, we studied whether religious mothers have more children and receive more support with their children.

Methods: We randomly sampled 395 mothers and 745 focal children enrolled in the Kiang West (The Gambia) Longitudinal Population Study cohort. Structured interviews asked mothers who and how often people invest in their children, and about their religious practices. Data were collected at participants' homes on electronic tablet-based long-form surveys and analyzed using the Bayesian hierarchical models.

Results: Religiosity was weakly associated with women's higher age-adjusted fertility. Maternal religiosity was negatively related to maternal investment in focal children, but positively associated with total allomaternal support. Specifically, a woman's religiosity was positively associated with allomaternal support from matrilineal kin, other offspring, and affinal kin, but unrelated to paternal, patrilineal, and non-kin investment.

Conclusions: These results suggest that higher fertility among religious mothers may be supported by high levels of investment from biological and affinal kin. Matrilineal kin, other siblings, and affinal kin seem to be the most responsive to a woman's religiosity. Our findings cast doubt on interpretations of women's religious behaviors as signals of fidelity, and instead suggest they may be part of strategies to enable collective allomaternal resources and higher relative fertility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在冈比亚母亲中,宗教参与与较高的生育率和较低的母亲投资有关,但与较多的全职父母支持有关。
目的:人类的育儿过程是合作性的,妇女通常能够通过许多人的帮助获得相对较高的生育率。以往的研究记录了在谁支持妇女养育子女方面存在的巨大社会生态差异,但对异母支持差异的文化内相关因素却知之甚少。在冈比亚这个宗教信仰浓厚、生育率较高的国家,我们研究了信教的母亲是否生育了更多的孩子,是否在抚养孩子方面得到了更多的支持:我们随机抽取了 395 名母亲和 745 名重点儿童,这些母亲和儿童都参加了 Kiang West(冈比亚)纵向人口研究队列。结构化访谈询问了母亲们人们对她们孩子的投资对象和投资频率,以及她们的宗教习俗。数据是在参与者家中通过基于平板电脑的电子长表调查收集的,并使用贝叶斯层次模型进行分析:结果:宗教信仰与妇女较高的年龄调整生育率关系不大。母亲的宗教信仰与母亲对重点子女的投资呈负相关,但与母亲对所有子女的支持呈正相关。具体而言,妇女的宗教信仰与来自母系亲属、其他后代和亲缘亲属的全母系支持正相关,但与父系、父系和非亲属投资无关:这些结果表明,有宗教信仰的母亲的生育率较高,可能是得到了亲生和近亲的高水平投资的支持。母系亲属、其他兄弟姐妹和姻亲似乎对妇女的宗教信仰反应最为敏感。我们的研究结果使人们对将妇女的宗教行为解释为忠诚的信号产生了怀疑,相反,我们的研究结果表明,妇女的宗教行为可能是使异母资源集体化和提高相对生育率的策略的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Biology is the Official Journal of the Human Biology Association. The American Journal of Human Biology is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed, internationally circulated journal that publishes reports of original research, theoretical articles and timely reviews, and brief communications in the interdisciplinary field of human biology. As the official journal of the Human Biology Association, the Journal also publishes abstracts of research presented at its annual scientific meeting and book reviews relevant to the field. The Journal seeks scholarly manuscripts that address all aspects of human biology, health, and disease, particularly those that stress comparative, developmental, ecological, or evolutionary perspectives. The transdisciplinary areas covered in the Journal include, but are not limited to, epidemiology, genetic variation, population biology and demography, physiology, anatomy, nutrition, growth and aging, physical performance, physical activity and fitness, ecology, and evolution, along with their interactions. The Journal publishes basic, applied, and methodologically oriented research from all areas, including measurement, analytical techniques and strategies, and computer applications in human biology. Like many other biologically oriented disciplines, the field of human biology has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years, and the expansion of the aims and scope of the Journal is a reflection of this growth and membership diversification. The Journal is committed to prompt review, and priority publication is given to manuscripts with novel or timely findings, and to manuscripts of unusual interest.
期刊最新文献
Meta-Analysis of the Heritability of Childhood Height From 560 000 Pairs of Relatives Born Between 1929 and 2004. Celebrating 50 Years of the Human Biology Association. Comparison of Sport Type on the Handgrip Strength Change in Young Athletes. Anthropometric Studies of Schoolchildren During the First Decades of the 20th Century in Spain and Argentina. Is Alcohol Consumption Pattern Dependent on Prenatal Sex-Steroids? A Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Study Among University Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1