Validation of the Persistent Somatic Symptom Stigma Scale for Healthcare Professionals

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111505
Brodie McGhie-Fraser , Aranka Ballering , Peter Lucassen , Caoimhe McLoughlin , Evelien Brouwers , Jon Stone , Tim olde Hartman , Sandra van Dulmen
{"title":"Validation of the Persistent Somatic Symptom Stigma Scale for Healthcare Professionals","authors":"Brodie McGhie-Fraser ,&nbsp;Aranka Ballering ,&nbsp;Peter Lucassen ,&nbsp;Caoimhe McLoughlin ,&nbsp;Evelien Brouwers ,&nbsp;Jon Stone ,&nbsp;Tim olde Hartman ,&nbsp;Sandra van Dulmen","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) describe recurrent or continuously occurring symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, or pain that have persisted for at least several months. These include single symptoms such as chronic pain, combinations of symptoms, or functional disorders such as fibromyalgia or irritable bowel syndrome. While many studies have explored stigmatisation by healthcare professionals toward people with PSS, there is a lack of validated measurement instruments. We recently developed a stigma scale, the Persistent Somatic Symptom Stigma scale for Healthcare Professionals (PSSS-HCP). The aim of this study is to evaluate the measurement properties (validity and reliability) and factor structure of the PSSS-HCP.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><p>The PSSS-HCP was tested with 121 healthcare professionals across the United Kingdom to evaluate its measurement properties. Analysis of the factor structure was conducted using principal component analysis. We calculated Cronbach's alpha to determine the internal consistency of each (sub)scale. Test-retest reliability was conducted with a subsample of participants with a 2-week interval. We evaluated convergent validity by testing the association between the PSSS-HCP and the Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) and the influence of social desirability using the short form of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MCSDS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The PSSS-HCP showed sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and sufficient test-retest reliability, intraclass correlation = 0.97 (95% CI 0.94–0.99, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Convergent validity was sufficient between the PSSS-HCP and the MCRS, and no relationship was found between the PSSS-HCP and the MCSDS. A three factor structure was identified (othering, uneasiness in interaction, non-disclosure) which accounted for 60.5% of the variance using 13 of the 19 tested items.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PSSS-HCP can be used to measure PSS stigmatisation by healthcare professionals. The PSSS-HCP has demonstrated sufficient internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and no evidence of social desirability bias. The PSSS-HCP has demonstrated potential to measure important aspects of stigma and provide a foundation for stigma reduction intervention evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 111505"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002610/pdfft?md5=9b4cfcd16d876ea9ae68701e88d71ef3&pid=1-s2.0-S0895435624002610-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) describe recurrent or continuously occurring symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, or pain that have persisted for at least several months. These include single symptoms such as chronic pain, combinations of symptoms, or functional disorders such as fibromyalgia or irritable bowel syndrome. While many studies have explored stigmatisation by healthcare professionals toward people with PSS, there is a lack of validated measurement instruments. We recently developed a stigma scale, the Persistent Somatic Symptom Stigma scale for Healthcare Professionals (PSSS-HCP). The aim of this study is to evaluate the measurement properties (validity and reliability) and factor structure of the PSSS-HCP.

Study Design and Setting

The PSSS-HCP was tested with 121 healthcare professionals across the United Kingdom to evaluate its measurement properties. Analysis of the factor structure was conducted using principal component analysis. We calculated Cronbach's alpha to determine the internal consistency of each (sub)scale. Test-retest reliability was conducted with a subsample of participants with a 2-week interval. We evaluated convergent validity by testing the association between the PSSS-HCP and the Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) and the influence of social desirability using the short form of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MCSDS).

Results

The PSSS-HCP showed sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and sufficient test-retest reliability, intraclass correlation = 0.97 (95% CI 0.94–0.99, P < .001). Convergent validity was sufficient between the PSSS-HCP and the MCRS, and no relationship was found between the PSSS-HCP and the MCSDS. A three factor structure was identified (othering, uneasiness in interaction, non-disclosure) which accounted for 60.5% of the variance using 13 of the 19 tested items.

Conclusion

The PSSS-HCP can be used to measure PSS stigmatisation by healthcare professionals. The PSSS-HCP has demonstrated sufficient internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and no evidence of social desirability bias. The PSSS-HCP has demonstrated potential to measure important aspects of stigma and provide a foundation for stigma reduction intervention evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员持续性躯体症状羞辱量表(PSSS-HCP)的验证。
目的:持续性躯体症状(PSS)是指反复或持续出现的症状,如疲劳、头晕或疼痛,且至少已持续数月。这些症状包括慢性疼痛等单一症状、症状组合或纤维肌痛或肠易激综合征等功能性疾病。虽然许多研究都探讨了医护人员对 PSS 患者的污名化问题,但缺乏有效的测量工具。我们最近开发了一种污名化量表,即医护人员持久性躯体症状污名化量表(PSSS-HCP)。本研究旨在评估 PSSS-HCP 的测量特性(有效性和可靠性)和因子结构:在英国对 121 名医疗保健专业人员进行了 PSSS-HCP 测试,以评估其测量特性。采用主成分分析法对因子结构进行了分析。我们计算了 Cronbach's alpha,以确定每个(子)量表的内部一致性。在间隔两周的时间内,对参与者的子样本进行了再测试。我们通过测试 PSSS-HCP 与医疗条件关注量表(MCRS)之间的关联性,以及使用马洛-克劳恩社会宜人性量表(MCSDS)简表对社会宜人性的影响,对收敛效度进行了评估:结果:PSSS-HCP 显示出足够的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.84)和足够的测试-再测试可靠性,类内相关 = 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.99, pConclusion):PSSS-HCP可用于测量医护人员对PSS的污名化程度。PSSS-HCP 已证明具有足够的内部一致性、重测可靠性和收敛效度,而且社会期望偏差的影响极小。PSSS-HCP 已证明具有测量污名化重要方面的潜力,并为评估减少污名化干预措施奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
期刊最新文献
Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: Rapid scoping review and content analysis. Corrigendum to 'Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of cochrane review searches' [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 149 (2022) 83-88]. A methodological review identified several options for utilizing registries for randomized controlled trials. Real-time Adaptive Randomization of Clinical Trials. Some superiority trials with non-significant results published in high impact factor journals correspond to non-inferiority situations: a research-on-research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1