Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: rapid scoping review and content analysis

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111616
Lesley Uttley , Louise Falzon , Jennifer A. Byrne , Andrea C. Tricco , Marcus R. Munafò , David Moher , Thomas Stoeger , Limbanazo Matandika , Cyril Labbé , Florian Naudet
{"title":"Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: rapid scoping review and content analysis","authors":"Lesley Uttley ,&nbsp;Louise Falzon ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Byrne ,&nbsp;Andrea C. Tricco ,&nbsp;Marcus R. Munafò ,&nbsp;David Moher ,&nbsp;Thomas Stoeger ,&nbsp;Limbanazo Matandika ,&nbsp;Cyril Labbé ,&nbsp;Florian Naudet","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Research culture is strongly influenced by academic incentives and pressures such as the imperative to publish in academic journals, and can influence the nature and quality of the evidence we produce.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this rapid scoping review is to capture the breadth of differential pressures and contributors to current research culture, drawing together content from empirical research specific to the health and biomedical sciences.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>PubMed and Web of Science were searched for empirical studies of influences and impacts on health and biomedical research culture, published between January 2012 and April 2024. Data charting extracted the key findings and relationships in research culture from included papers such as workforce composition; equitable access to research; academic journal trends, incentives, and reproducibility; erroneous research; questionable research practices; biases vested interests; and misconduct. A diverse author network was consulted to ensure content validity of the proposed framework of i) inclusivity, ii) transparency, iii) rigor, and iv) objectivity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A growing field of studies examining research culture exists ranging from the inclusivity of the scientific workforce, the transparency of the data generated, the rigor of the methods used and the objectivity of the researchers involved. Figurative diagrams are presented to storyboard the links between research culture content and findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The wide range of research culture influences in the recent literature indicates the need for coordinated and sustained research culture conversations. Core principles in effective research environments should include inclusive collaboration and diverse research workforces, rigorous methodological approaches, transparency, data sharing, and reflection on scientific objectivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 111616"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089543562400372X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research culture is strongly influenced by academic incentives and pressures such as the imperative to publish in academic journals, and can influence the nature and quality of the evidence we produce.

Objective

The purpose of this rapid scoping review is to capture the breadth of differential pressures and contributors to current research culture, drawing together content from empirical research specific to the health and biomedical sciences.

Study Design and Setting

PubMed and Web of Science were searched for empirical studies of influences and impacts on health and biomedical research culture, published between January 2012 and April 2024. Data charting extracted the key findings and relationships in research culture from included papers such as workforce composition; equitable access to research; academic journal trends, incentives, and reproducibility; erroneous research; questionable research practices; biases vested interests; and misconduct. A diverse author network was consulted to ensure content validity of the proposed framework of i) inclusivity, ii) transparency, iii) rigor, and iv) objectivity.

Results

A growing field of studies examining research culture exists ranging from the inclusivity of the scientific workforce, the transparency of the data generated, the rigor of the methods used and the objectivity of the researchers involved. Figurative diagrams are presented to storyboard the links between research culture content and findings.

Conclusion

The wide range of research culture influences in the recent literature indicates the need for coordinated and sustained research culture conversations. Core principles in effective research environments should include inclusive collaboration and diverse research workforces, rigorous methodological approaches, transparency, data sharing, and reflection on scientific objectivity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康和生物医学研究中的研究文化影响:快速范围审查和内容分析。
背景:研究文化深受学术激励(如在学术期刊上发表论文的压力)的影响,并可能影响我们所提供证据的性质和质量:本快速范围界定综述的目的是通过收集健康和生物医学科学领域的经验研究内容,了解当前研究文化所面临的不同压力和促成因素:研究设计:我们在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 上搜索了 2012 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月间发表的有关健康和生物医学研究文化的影响和冲击的实证研究。数据图表从收录的论文中提取了研究文化的主要发现和关系,如:劳动力构成;公平获取研究成果;学术期刊趋势、激励机制、可复制性;错误研究;有问题的研究实践;偏见既得利益和不当行为。为了确保拟议框架的内容有效性,我们咨询了不同作者的意见,包括 i) 包容性、ii) 透明度、iii) 严谨性和 iv) 客观性:越来越多的研究对科研文化进行了探讨,研究范围包括科学工作者的包容性、所生成数据的透明度、所使用方法的严谨性以及相关研究人员的客观性。本文通过形象化的图表,将研究文化内容与研究结果之间的联系故事化:最近的文献对研究文化的影响范围很广,这表明有必要开展协调、持续的研究文化对话。有效研究环境的核心原则应包括包容性合作和多元化研究队伍、严谨的方法论、透明度、数据共享以及对科学客观性的反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence and large language models for interview transcription in qualitative research: competency, politeness, and ethical implications Practical elements to consider when emulating a target trial Crossing the null does not mean “no effect”: a survey of internal medicine physicians on the interpretation of effect estimates with wide confidence intervals Rethinking clinical trials in the multimorbidity era: the imperative for patient-centered tailored approaches Depression rating scales demonstrate significant correlations but systematic differences: a multicenter prospective cohort study using equipercentile linking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1