Lesley Uttley, Louise Falzon, Jennifer A Byrne, Andrea C Tricco, Marcus R Munafò, David Moher, Thomas Stoeger, Limbanazo Matandika, Cyril Labbé, Florian Naudet
{"title":"Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: Rapid scoping review and content analysis.","authors":"Lesley Uttley, Louise Falzon, Jennifer A Byrne, Andrea C Tricco, Marcus R Munafò, David Moher, Thomas Stoeger, Limbanazo Matandika, Cyril Labbé, Florian Naudet","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research culture is strongly influenced by academic incentives such as the pressure to publish in academic journals, and can influence the nature and quality of the evidence we produce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this rapid scoping review is to capture the breadth of differential pressures and contributors to current research culture, drawing together content from empirical research specific to the health and biomedical sciences.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>PubMed and Web of Science were searched for empirical studies of influences and impacts on health and biomedical research culture, published between January 2012 to April 2024. Data charting extracted the key findings and relationships in research culture from included papers such as: workforce composition; equitable access to research; academic journal trends, incentives, reproducibility; erroneous research; questionable research practices; biases vested interests and misconduct. A diverse author network was consulted to ensure content validity of the proposed framework of i) inclusivity, ii) transparency, iii) rigour and iv) objectivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A growing field of studies examining research culture exists ranging from the inclusivity of the scientific workforce, the transparency of the data generated, the rigour of the methods used and the objectivity of the researchers involved. Figurative diagrams are presented to storyboard the links between research culture content and findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The wide range of research culture influences in the recent literature indicates the need for coordinated and sustained research culture conversations. Core principles in effective research environments should include inclusive collaboration and diverse research workforces, rigorous methodological approaches, transparency, data sharing and reflection on scientific objectivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"111616"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research culture is strongly influenced by academic incentives such as the pressure to publish in academic journals, and can influence the nature and quality of the evidence we produce.
Objective: The purpose of this rapid scoping review is to capture the breadth of differential pressures and contributors to current research culture, drawing together content from empirical research specific to the health and biomedical sciences.
Study design: PubMed and Web of Science were searched for empirical studies of influences and impacts on health and biomedical research culture, published between January 2012 to April 2024. Data charting extracted the key findings and relationships in research culture from included papers such as: workforce composition; equitable access to research; academic journal trends, incentives, reproducibility; erroneous research; questionable research practices; biases vested interests and misconduct. A diverse author network was consulted to ensure content validity of the proposed framework of i) inclusivity, ii) transparency, iii) rigour and iv) objectivity.
Results: A growing field of studies examining research culture exists ranging from the inclusivity of the scientific workforce, the transparency of the data generated, the rigour of the methods used and the objectivity of the researchers involved. Figurative diagrams are presented to storyboard the links between research culture content and findings.
Conclusion: The wide range of research culture influences in the recent literature indicates the need for coordinated and sustained research culture conversations. Core principles in effective research environments should include inclusive collaboration and diverse research workforces, rigorous methodological approaches, transparency, data sharing and reflection on scientific objectivity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.