Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Prostate Cancer Mortality: An Emulation of Target Trials in US Medicare.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1200/CCI.24.00094
Xabier García-Albéniz, John Hsu, Ruth Etzioni, June M Chan, Joy Shi, Barbra Dickerman, Miguel A Hernán
{"title":"Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Prostate Cancer Mortality: An Emulation of Target Trials in US Medicare.","authors":"Xabier García-Albéniz, John Hsu, Ruth Etzioni, June M Chan, Joy Shi, Barbra Dickerman, Miguel A Hernán","doi":"10.1200/CCI.24.00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>No consensus about the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening exists among clinical guidelines, especially for the elderly. Randomized trials of PSA screening have yielded different results, partly because of variations in adherence, and it is unlikely that new trials will be conducted. Our objective was to estimate the effect of annual PSA screening on prostate cancer (PC) mortality in Medicare beneficiaries age 67-84 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a large-scale, population-based, observational study of two screening strategies: annual PSA screening and no screening. We used data from 537,599 US Medicare (2001-2008) beneficiaries age 67-84 years who had a good life expectancy, no previous PC, and no PSA test in the 2 years before baseline. We estimated the 8-year PC mortality and incidence, treatments for PC, and treatment complications of PSA screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In men age 67-74 years, the estimated difference in 8-year risk of PC death between PSA screening and no screening was -2.3 (95% CI, -4.1 to -1.1) deaths per 1,000 men (a negative risk difference favors screening). Treatment complications were more frequent under PSA screening than under no screening. In men age 75-84 years, risk difference estimates were closer to zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our estimates suggest that under conventional statistical criteria, annual PSA screening for 8 years is highly compatible with reductions of PC mortality from four to one fewer PC deaths per 1,000 screened men age 67-74 years. As with any study using real-world data, the estimates could be affected by residual confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400094"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: No consensus about the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening exists among clinical guidelines, especially for the elderly. Randomized trials of PSA screening have yielded different results, partly because of variations in adherence, and it is unlikely that new trials will be conducted. Our objective was to estimate the effect of annual PSA screening on prostate cancer (PC) mortality in Medicare beneficiaries age 67-84 years.

Methods: This is a large-scale, population-based, observational study of two screening strategies: annual PSA screening and no screening. We used data from 537,599 US Medicare (2001-2008) beneficiaries age 67-84 years who had a good life expectancy, no previous PC, and no PSA test in the 2 years before baseline. We estimated the 8-year PC mortality and incidence, treatments for PC, and treatment complications of PSA screening.

Results: In men age 67-74 years, the estimated difference in 8-year risk of PC death between PSA screening and no screening was -2.3 (95% CI, -4.1 to -1.1) deaths per 1,000 men (a negative risk difference favors screening). Treatment complications were more frequent under PSA screening than under no screening. In men age 75-84 years, risk difference estimates were closer to zero.

Conclusion: Our estimates suggest that under conventional statistical criteria, annual PSA screening for 8 years is highly compatible with reductions of PC mortality from four to one fewer PC deaths per 1,000 screened men age 67-74 years. As with any study using real-world data, the estimates could be affected by residual confounding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺特异性抗原筛查与前列腺癌死亡率:美国医疗保险中目标试验的模拟。
目的:临床指南对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的有效性尚未达成共识,尤其是针对老年人。PSA 筛查的随机试验产生了不同的结果,部分原因是坚持率存在差异,而且不太可能进行新的试验。我们的目标是估算每年进行 PSA 筛查对 67-84 岁医疗保险受益人前列腺癌(PC)死亡率的影响:这是一项大规模、基于人群的观察性研究,涉及两种筛查策略:每年进行 PSA 筛查和不进行筛查。我们使用了 537,599 名美国医疗保险(2001-2008 年)受益人的数据,这些受益人年龄在 67-84 岁之间,预期寿命良好,既往未患 PC,基线前 2 年未进行 PSA 检测。我们估算了 8 年的 PC 死亡率和发病率、PC 治疗方法以及 PSA 筛查的治疗并发症:在 67-74 岁的男性中,PSA 筛查与不做筛查的 8 年 PC 死亡风险估计差异为-2.3(95% CI,-4.1 至-1.1)/1,000(负风险差异有利于筛查)。筛查 PSA 比不筛查更容易出现治疗并发症。在 75-84 岁的男性中,风险差异估计值更接近于零:我们的估算结果表明,根据传统的统计标准,每年进行一次为期 8 年的 PSA 筛查可将 PC 死亡率降低到每 1,000 名接受筛查的 67-74 岁男性中 PC 死亡人数减少 4 到 1 人的水平。与任何使用真实世界数据的研究一样,估计值可能会受到残余混杂因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
期刊最新文献
Development, Validation, and Clinical Utility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Enhanced Prediction Models for Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy. Metastatic Versus Localized Disease as Inclusion Criteria That Can Be Automatically Extracted From Randomized Controlled Trials Using Natural Language Processing. Identifying Oncology Patients at High Risk for Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits Using a Novel Definition. Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Risk Prediction Model Development to Support Cancer Care Delivery: A Scoping Review. Optimizing End Points for Phase III Cancer Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1