How consumers process online hotel ratings

IF 10.4 1区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Annals of Tourism Research Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2024.103822
Bi Yang , Tian Ye , Stephanie Q. Liu , Yujie Zhao
{"title":"How consumers process online hotel ratings","authors":"Bi Yang ,&nbsp;Tian Ye ,&nbsp;Stephanie Q. Liu ,&nbsp;Yujie Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.annals.2024.103822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Online travel agencies commonly utilize 5-point and 10-point scales to display hotel ratings. When processing and comparing hotel ratings on different numerical scales (e.g., 4.1/5 vs. 8.4/10), what method(s) do consumers use? Through nine studies, this research shows that consumers tend to employ absolute differences (e.g., 5–4.1 vs. 10–8.4) or relative differences (e.g., 4.1 ÷ 5 vs. 8.4 ÷ 10) when making comparative judgments. Notably, the choice of method can lead to preference reversals. We further reveal that higher numeracy leads to greater reliance on relative differences. However, such an impact is attenuated under a utilitarian motive. Additionally, a greater promotion focus leads to greater reliance on absolute differences. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how consumers process hotel ratings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48452,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Tourism Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Tourism Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738324000999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online travel agencies commonly utilize 5-point and 10-point scales to display hotel ratings. When processing and comparing hotel ratings on different numerical scales (e.g., 4.1/5 vs. 8.4/10), what method(s) do consumers use? Through nine studies, this research shows that consumers tend to employ absolute differences (e.g., 5–4.1 vs. 10–8.4) or relative differences (e.g., 4.1 ÷ 5 vs. 8.4 ÷ 10) when making comparative judgments. Notably, the choice of method can lead to preference reversals. We further reveal that higher numeracy leads to greater reliance on relative differences. However, such an impact is attenuated under a utilitarian motive. Additionally, a greater promotion focus leads to greater reliance on absolute differences. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how consumers process hotel ratings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者如何处理在线酒店评级
在线旅行社通常使用 5 分制和 10 分制来显示酒店评分。在处理和比较不同数字等级的酒店评分(如 4.1/5 与 8.4/10)时,消费者会使用什么方法?本研究通过九项研究表明,消费者在进行比较判断时倾向于使用绝对差异(如 5-4.1 与 10-8.4)或相对差异(如 4.1 ÷ 5 与 8.4 ÷ 10)。值得注意的是,方法的选择会导致偏好逆转。我们进一步发现,计算能力越高,越依赖相对差异。然而,在功利动机的作用下,这种影响会减弱。此外,对晋升的更大关注会导致对绝对差异的更大依赖。这些发现有助于我们更细致地了解消费者是如何处理酒店评级的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Annals of Tourism Research is a scholarly journal that focuses on academic perspectives related to tourism. The journal defines tourism as a global economic activity that involves travel behavior, management and marketing activities of service industries catering to consumer demand, the effects of tourism on communities, and policy and governance at local, national, and international levels. While the journal aims to strike a balance between theory and application, its primary focus is on developing theoretical constructs that bridge the gap between business and the social and behavioral sciences. The disciplinary areas covered in the journal include, but are not limited to, service industries management, marketing science, consumer marketing, decision-making and behavior, business ethics, economics and forecasting, environment, geography and development, education and knowledge development, political science and administration, consumer-focused psychology, and anthropology and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Caring wings of hospidarity: Creating safe transitional spaces through hospitality alliances Bridging travel medicine and tourism: A call for collaboration ChatGPT personalized and humorous recommendations Negotiating the gray zone: Ski guiding routine dynamics Short-term summer trips: Climate hazards & substitution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1