Personality Profiles Among Honors and Regular Undergraduate Students: Associations With Well-Being and Strategies for Coping With Stress

IF 3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Gifted Child Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1177/00169862241269058
Sakhavat Mammadov, Dana Lockhart, Anne Rinn, Thomas J. Ward
{"title":"Personality Profiles Among Honors and Regular Undergraduate Students: Associations With Well-Being and Strategies for Coping With Stress","authors":"Sakhavat Mammadov, Dana Lockhart, Anne Rinn, Thomas J. Ward","doi":"10.1177/00169862241269058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was two-fold: (a) to explore personality profiles among honors undergraduate students and regular undergraduate students, and (b) to investigate the extent to which these profiles are associated with students’ well-being and coping strategies for stress. Using latent class analysis (LCA) on the Big Five personality traits of a total of 532 undergraduate students (229 honors students), we identified three distinct profiles: Overcontrollers, Averages, and Resilients. Honors students were underrepresented in the Averages profile. No significant disproportionality was observed in the other two profiles. Resilients had the highest well-being scores and showed a greater tendency to engage in proactive problem-solving when faced with stress. In contrast, Overcontrollers leaned toward using accountability and self-critique as their primary coping strategy. Findings are discussed in the context of replicable personality prototypes and in relationship to prior research involving honors and academically advanced students.","PeriodicalId":47514,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Quarterly","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862241269058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was two-fold: (a) to explore personality profiles among honors undergraduate students and regular undergraduate students, and (b) to investigate the extent to which these profiles are associated with students’ well-being and coping strategies for stress. Using latent class analysis (LCA) on the Big Five personality traits of a total of 532 undergraduate students (229 honors students), we identified three distinct profiles: Overcontrollers, Averages, and Resilients. Honors students were underrepresented in the Averages profile. No significant disproportionality was observed in the other two profiles. Resilients had the highest well-being scores and showed a greater tendency to engage in proactive problem-solving when faced with stress. In contrast, Overcontrollers leaned toward using accountability and self-critique as their primary coping strategy. Findings are discussed in the context of replicable personality prototypes and in relationship to prior research involving honors and academically advanced students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荣誉生和普通本科生的人格特征:与幸福感和压力应对策略的关系
本研究有两个目的:(a)探索荣誉本科生和普通本科生的人格特质;(b)研究这些人格特质与学生的幸福感和压力应对策略的关联程度。通过对 532 名本科生(229 名优等生)的五大人格特质进行潜类分析(LCA),我们发现了三种不同的人格特质:他们分别是:过度控制者(Overcontrollers)、平庸者(Averages)和复原者(Resilients)。优等生在 "平均数 "特征中的比例偏低。在其他两个特征中没有观察到明显的比例失调。恢复能力强的学生幸福感得分最高,在面对压力时更倾向于积极主动地解决问题。相比之下,过度控制者倾向于将问责和自我批评作为主要的应对策略。研究结果将在可复制人格原型的背景下进行讨论,并与之前涉及优等生和学业先进学生的研究相联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
29.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.
期刊最新文献
A Meta-Analytic Evaluation: Investigating Evidence for the Validity of the Cognitive Abilities Test Voices of Families of Color: Navigating White Spaces in Gifted Education Research Topics and Trends in Gifted Education: A Structural Topic Model Evidence-Based Instructional Practices for Twice-Exceptional Students With Autism Toward Equity and Transparency: A Content Analysis of Florida Elementary Acceleration Policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1