Bram De Laere, Alessio Crippa, Andrea Discacciati, Berit Larsson, Maria Persson, Susanne Johansson, Sanne D’hondt, Rebecka Bergström, Venkatesh Chellappa, Markus Mayrhofer, Mahsan Banijamali, Anastasijia Kotsalaynen, Céline Schelstraete, Jan Pieter Vanwelkenhuyzen, Marie Hjälm-Eriksson, Linn Pettersson, Anders Ullén, Nicolaas Lumen, Gunilla Enblad, Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson, Elin Jänes, Johan Sandzén, Peter Schatteman, Maria Nyre Vigmostad, Martha Olsson, Christophe Ghysel, Brieuc Sautois, Wendy De Roock, Siska Van Bruwaene, Mats Anden, Ingrida Verbiene, Daan De Maeseneer, Els Everaert, Jochen Darras, Bjørg Y. Aksnessether, Daisy Luyten, Michiel Strijbos, Ashkan Mortezavi, Jan Oldenburg, Piet Ost, Martin Eklund, Henrik Grönberg, Johan Lindberg
{"title":"Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and taxanes in metastatic prostate cancer: an outcome-adaptive randomized platform trial","authors":"Bram De Laere, Alessio Crippa, Andrea Discacciati, Berit Larsson, Maria Persson, Susanne Johansson, Sanne D’hondt, Rebecka Bergström, Venkatesh Chellappa, Markus Mayrhofer, Mahsan Banijamali, Anastasijia Kotsalaynen, Céline Schelstraete, Jan Pieter Vanwelkenhuyzen, Marie Hjälm-Eriksson, Linn Pettersson, Anders Ullén, Nicolaas Lumen, Gunilla Enblad, Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson, Elin Jänes, Johan Sandzén, Peter Schatteman, Maria Nyre Vigmostad, Martha Olsson, Christophe Ghysel, Brieuc Sautois, Wendy De Roock, Siska Van Bruwaene, Mats Anden, Ingrida Verbiene, Daan De Maeseneer, Els Everaert, Jochen Darras, Bjørg Y. Aksnessether, Daisy Luyten, Michiel Strijbos, Ashkan Mortezavi, Jan Oldenburg, Piet Ost, Martin Eklund, Henrik Grönberg, Johan Lindberg","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03204-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ProBio is the first outcome-adaptive platform trial in prostate cancer utilizing a Bayesian framework to evaluate efficacy within predefined biomarker signatures across systemic treatments. Prospective circulating tumor DNA and germline DNA analysis was performed in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer before randomization to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), taxanes or a physician’s choice control arm. The primary endpoint was the time to no longer clinically benefitting (NLCB). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and (serious) adverse events. Upon reaching the time to NLCB, patients could be re-randomized. The primary endpoint was met after 218 randomizations. ARPIs demonstrated ~50% longer time to NLCB compared to taxanes (median, 11.1 versus 6.9 months) and the physician’s choice arm (median, 11.1 versus 7.4 months) in the biomarker-unselected or ‘all’ patient population. ARPIs demonstrated longer overall survival (median, 38.7 versus 21.7 and 21.8 months for taxanes and physician’s choice, respectively). Biomarker signature findings suggest that the largest increase in time to NLCB was observed in AR (single-nucleotide variant/genomic structural rearrangement)-negative and TP53 wild-type patients and TMPRSS2–ERG fusion-positive patients, whereas no difference between ARPIs and taxanes was observed in TP53-altered patients. In summary, ARPIs outperform taxanes and physician’s choice treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with detectable circulating tumor DNA. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03903835 . In a biomarker-driven, outcome-adaptive platform trial for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors showed longer survival with respect to taxanes and physician’s choice treatment.","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"30 11","pages":"3291-3302"},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03204-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03204-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ProBio is the first outcome-adaptive platform trial in prostate cancer utilizing a Bayesian framework to evaluate efficacy within predefined biomarker signatures across systemic treatments. Prospective circulating tumor DNA and germline DNA analysis was performed in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer before randomization to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), taxanes or a physician’s choice control arm. The primary endpoint was the time to no longer clinically benefitting (NLCB). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and (serious) adverse events. Upon reaching the time to NLCB, patients could be re-randomized. The primary endpoint was met after 218 randomizations. ARPIs demonstrated ~50% longer time to NLCB compared to taxanes (median, 11.1 versus 6.9 months) and the physician’s choice arm (median, 11.1 versus 7.4 months) in the biomarker-unselected or ‘all’ patient population. ARPIs demonstrated longer overall survival (median, 38.7 versus 21.7 and 21.8 months for taxanes and physician’s choice, respectively). Biomarker signature findings suggest that the largest increase in time to NLCB was observed in AR (single-nucleotide variant/genomic structural rearrangement)-negative and TP53 wild-type patients and TMPRSS2–ERG fusion-positive patients, whereas no difference between ARPIs and taxanes was observed in TP53-altered patients. In summary, ARPIs outperform taxanes and physician’s choice treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with detectable circulating tumor DNA. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03903835 . In a biomarker-driven, outcome-adaptive platform trial for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors showed longer survival with respect to taxanes and physician’s choice treatment.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.