Circulating levels of endogenous complement inhibitors correlate inversely with complement consumption in systemic lupus erythematosus

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY European Journal of Immunology Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1002/eji.202450998
Stef van der Meulen, Rory C. Monahan, Kyra A. Gelderman, Cees van Kooten, Y.K. Onno Teng, Tom W.J. Huizinga, Gerda M. Steup-Beekman, Leendert A. Trouw
{"title":"Circulating levels of endogenous complement inhibitors correlate inversely with complement consumption in systemic lupus erythematosus","authors":"Stef van der Meulen,&nbsp;Rory C. Monahan,&nbsp;Kyra A. Gelderman,&nbsp;Cees van Kooten,&nbsp;Y.K. Onno Teng,&nbsp;Tom W.J. Huizinga,&nbsp;Gerda M. Steup-Beekman,&nbsp;Leendert A. Trouw","doi":"10.1002/eji.202450998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is marked by excessive complement activation, contributing to tissue damage. Complement activation can be detected in many organs including the skin, kidney, and brain. The involvement of the central nervous system is particularly relevant to understanding neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE), one of the poorest understood manifestations of SLE for which no biomarkers are available. We studied the levels of complement inhibitors in SLE in relation to disease activity and as possible biomarkers to identify NPSLE. Serum levels of complement inhibitors C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), C4b-binding protein (C4BP), Factor I, and Factor H were measured in 345 SLE patients (including 102 with NPSLE) and 108 healthy controls. Compared with controls, SLE patients had higher C1-INH and C4BP but lower Factor I and H levels. All inhibitors positively correlated with total C3 and C4 levels. While correlating with the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), no distinction in inhibitor levels was found between SLE and NPSLE patients. Over time, C1-INH and Factor H levels normalized, but no significant changes were observed for C4BP and Factor I. In SLE the levels of circulating complement inhibitors are inversely correlated to complement consumption but do not serve as biomarkers for NPSLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":165,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Immunology","volume":"54 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eji.202450998","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eji.202450998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is marked by excessive complement activation, contributing to tissue damage. Complement activation can be detected in many organs including the skin, kidney, and brain. The involvement of the central nervous system is particularly relevant to understanding neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE), one of the poorest understood manifestations of SLE for which no biomarkers are available. We studied the levels of complement inhibitors in SLE in relation to disease activity and as possible biomarkers to identify NPSLE. Serum levels of complement inhibitors C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), C4b-binding protein (C4BP), Factor I, and Factor H were measured in 345 SLE patients (including 102 with NPSLE) and 108 healthy controls. Compared with controls, SLE patients had higher C1-INH and C4BP but lower Factor I and H levels. All inhibitors positively correlated with total C3 and C4 levels. While correlating with the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), no distinction in inhibitor levels was found between SLE and NPSLE patients. Over time, C1-INH and Factor H levels normalized, but no significant changes were observed for C4BP and Factor I. In SLE the levels of circulating complement inhibitors are inversely correlated to complement consumption but do not serve as biomarkers for NPSLE.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环中的内源性补体抑制剂水平与系统性红斑狼疮患者的补体消耗量成反比。
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的特点是补体过度激活,导致组织损伤。许多器官都能检测到补体激活,包括皮肤、肾脏和大脑。中枢神经系统的参与与了解神经精神系统性红斑狼疮(NPSLE)尤其相关,NPSLE是系统性红斑狼疮中最不为人所知的表现之一,目前尚无生物标记物。我们研究了系统性红斑狼疮中补体结合抑制剂的水平与疾病活动的关系,并将其作为识别 NPSLE 的可能生物标志物。我们测量了345名系统性红斑狼疮患者(包括102名非系统性红斑狼疮患者)和108名健康对照者血清中补体结合蛋白(C4BP)、C1-抑制剂(C1-INH)、因子I和因子H的水平。与对照组相比,系统性红斑狼疮患者的 C1-INH 和 C4BP 水平较高,但因子 I 和因子 H 水平较低。所有抑制剂都与总 C3 和 C4 水平呈正相关。虽然与系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)相关,但在系统性红斑狼疮和非系统性红斑狼疮患者之间并没有发现抑制剂水平的差异。随着时间的推移,C1-INH 和因子 H 的水平趋于正常,但 C4BP 和因子 I 的水平没有明显变化。在系统性红斑狼疮患者中,循环补体抑制剂的水平与补体消耗成反比,但不能作为非系统性红斑狼疮的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
224
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Immunology (EJI) is an official journal of EFIS. Established in 1971, EJI continues to serve the needs of the global immunology community covering basic, translational and clinical research, ranging from adaptive and innate immunity through to vaccines and immunotherapy, cancer, autoimmunity, allergy and more. Mechanistic insights and thought-provoking immunological findings are of interest, as are studies using the latest omics technologies. We offer fast track review for competitive situations, including recently scooped papers, format free submission, transparent and fair peer review and more as detailed in our policies.
期刊最新文献
Metabolic Reprogramming of Fibroblastic Reticular Cells in Immunity and Tolerance. Cytokine Autoantibodies Alter Gene Expression Profiles of Healthy Donors. Neural Crest-Derived Mesenchymal Cells Support Thymic Reconstitution After Lethal Irradiation. The Microbiome Modifies Manifestations of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Perforin-Deficient Mice. Type I Interferon Drives a Cellular State Inert to TCR-Stimulation and Could Impede Effective T-Cell Differentiation in Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1