Open label experience of repeated OnabotulinumtoxinA injections towards the sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with chronic cluster headache and chronic migraine.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1177/03331024241273967
Lucy Simmonds, Kent Are Jamtøy, Irina Aschehoug, Sozaburo Hara, Tore W Meisingset, Manjit S Matharu, Erling Tronvik, Daniel Fossum Bratbak
{"title":"Open label experience of repeated OnabotulinumtoxinA injections towards the sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with chronic cluster headache and chronic migraine.","authors":"Lucy Simmonds, Kent Are Jamtøy, Irina Aschehoug, Sozaburo Hara, Tore W Meisingset, Manjit S Matharu, Erling Tronvik, Daniel Fossum Bratbak","doi":"10.1177/03331024241273967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A novel technique for injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTA) towards the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has shown promise in refractory chronic migraine (CM) and chronic cluster headache (CCH). Open label safety and efficacy data are presented here.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with refractory CM or CCH who had received at least one injection and completed headache diaries were included. Efficacy was defined as ≥50% reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days for CM, or ≥50% reduction in attack frequency for CCH, at weeks five to eight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 261 injections, there were 123 adverse events (AE), of which one was serious. Most (93%) AEs were mild and all were transient. The 50% response to one injection was 81% for CM and 69% for CCH. The response gradually reduced over subsequent months for CM but stayed between 55% and 67% for CCH. Repeated injections were beneficial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injections resulted in improvement for both groups and was maintained with repeated injections. Repeat injection after three months may be beneficial in CM. Adverse events were not uncommon, but universally transient, presumably as a result of the mechanism of action of BTA. Repeated BTA injection towards the SPG could be an effective treatment for refractory CM and CCH. Larger, randomised, placebo-controlled trials are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"44 8","pages":"3331024241273967"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241273967","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A novel technique for injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTA) towards the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has shown promise in refractory chronic migraine (CM) and chronic cluster headache (CCH). Open label safety and efficacy data are presented here.

Methods: Patients with refractory CM or CCH who had received at least one injection and completed headache diaries were included. Efficacy was defined as ≥50% reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days for CM, or ≥50% reduction in attack frequency for CCH, at weeks five to eight.

Results: Over 261 injections, there were 123 adverse events (AE), of which one was serious. Most (93%) AEs were mild and all were transient. The 50% response to one injection was 81% for CM and 69% for CCH. The response gradually reduced over subsequent months for CM but stayed between 55% and 67% for CCH. Repeated injections were beneficial.

Conclusions: Injections resulted in improvement for both groups and was maintained with repeated injections. Repeat injection after three months may be beneficial in CM. Adverse events were not uncommon, but universally transient, presumably as a result of the mechanism of action of BTA. Repeated BTA injection towards the SPG could be an effective treatment for refractory CM and CCH. Larger, randomised, placebo-controlled trials are required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在慢性丛集性头痛和慢性偏头痛患者中反复注射奥那巴妥妥毒素A(OnabotulinumtoxinA)的开放标签经验。
背景:一种向脊神经节(SPG)注射奥诺布林毒素A(BTA)的新技术已在难治性慢性偏头痛(CM)和慢性丛集性头痛(CCH)中显示出前景。本文介绍了开放标签的安全性和有效性数据:方法:纳入至少接受过一次注射并填写头痛日记的难治性CM或CCH患者。疗效定义为:在第五至第八周,CM患者中度至重度头痛天数减少≥50%,或CCH患者发作频率减少≥50%:在261次注射中,共发生123例不良反应(AE),其中1例为严重不良反应。大多数(93%)不良反应是轻微的,而且都是一过性的。一次注射的 50%反应率为:CM 81%,CCH 69%。在随后的几个月中,CM 的反应率逐渐降低,但 CCH 的反应率保持在 55% 至 67% 之间。重复注射有益:结论:两组患者的注射效果均有所改善,且在重复注射后仍能保持。三个月后重复注射可能对中医有益。不良反应并不少见,但都是一过性的,这可能是 BTA 作用机制的结果。向SPG重复注射BTA可能是治疗难治性CM和CCH的有效方法。需要进行更大规模的随机安慰剂对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
期刊最新文献
Abnormal electromyographical trigeminal activation through stimulation of the offending artery (Z-L response): An intraoperative tool during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. A call for academic pragmatic clinical trials to address open questions in migraine prevention. Outcomes, unmet needs, and challenges in the management of patients who withdraw from anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: A prospective cohort study. Internal jugular vein valve incompetence: A key consideration in patients with exercise-induced headache. Stroke due to small-vessel disease and migraine: A case-control study of a young adult with ischemic stroke population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1