Comparison of lactate measurements from earlobe and fingertip capillary blood using Biosen S-Line and lactate scout analyzers.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05585-1
Fogen Zhong, Zhili Chen, Zhengqiu Gu, Xinxin Wang, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Yongming Li
{"title":"Comparison of lactate measurements from earlobe and fingertip capillary blood using Biosen S-Line and lactate scout analyzers.","authors":"Fogen Zhong, Zhili Chen, Zhengqiu Gu, Xinxin Wang, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Yongming Li","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05585-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare variations between the earlobe and fingertip sampling sites in exercises dominated by upper body muscle exertion. It also sought to investigate capillary blood lactate differences between Lactate Scout 4 (LS4) and a bench-top analyzer (Biosen S-Line analyzer, BSL) during Double Poling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from the earlobe and fingertip immediately before exercise, at the end of each of five stages, and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-min post-exercise. Forty healthy university students participated as volunteers. During the study, they performed double poling on a ski ergometer with progressively increasing load. Lactate levels were measured using both the BSL and LS4 analyzers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fingertip Bla values were significantly higher than earlobe values, with a mean bias of -0.66 mmol/L, reaching -0.86 mmol/L in the 4-8 mmol/L range. At the earlobe, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-a was 0.84 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-b, it was 0.85 (> 8 mmol/L). At the fingertip, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-c was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-d, it was 0.52 (> 8 mmol/L). Comparing LS4-a and LS4-b at the earlobe, the highest CCC was 0.83 (0-4 mmol/L). At the fingertip, comparing LS4-c and LS4-d, the highest CCC was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood lactate concentrations are higher at the fingertip than the earlobe during SkiErg double poling. The LS4 is less reliable, especially at the fingertip, so using the earlobe with the BSL analyzer is recommended for accurate measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05585-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare variations between the earlobe and fingertip sampling sites in exercises dominated by upper body muscle exertion. It also sought to investigate capillary blood lactate differences between Lactate Scout 4 (LS4) and a bench-top analyzer (Biosen S-Line analyzer, BSL) during Double Poling.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from the earlobe and fingertip immediately before exercise, at the end of each of five stages, and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-min post-exercise. Forty healthy university students participated as volunteers. During the study, they performed double poling on a ski ergometer with progressively increasing load. Lactate levels were measured using both the BSL and LS4 analyzers.

Results: Fingertip Bla values were significantly higher than earlobe values, with a mean bias of -0.66 mmol/L, reaching -0.86 mmol/L in the 4-8 mmol/L range. At the earlobe, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-a was 0.84 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-b, it was 0.85 (> 8 mmol/L). At the fingertip, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-c was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-d, it was 0.52 (> 8 mmol/L). Comparing LS4-a and LS4-b at the earlobe, the highest CCC was 0.83 (0-4 mmol/L). At the fingertip, comparing LS4-c and LS4-d, the highest CCC was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L).

Conclusions: Blood lactate concentrations are higher at the fingertip than the earlobe during SkiErg double poling. The LS4 is less reliable, especially at the fingertip, so using the earlobe with the BSL analyzer is recommended for accurate measurements.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Biosen S-Line 和乳酸侦察兵分析仪测量耳垂和指尖毛细血管血液中乳酸含量的比较。
目的:本研究旨在比较在以上半身肌肉用力为主的运动中耳垂和指尖取样部位之间的差异。研究还试图调查在双杠运动中乳酸侦测器 4(LS4)和台式分析仪(Biosen S-Line 分析仪,BSL)之间毛细血管血乳酸的差异:方法:分别在运动前、运动后 1、3、5 和 7 分钟的五个阶段结束时从耳垂和指尖采集血液样本。40 名健康大学生作为志愿者参与了研究。在研究过程中,他们在滑雪测力计上进行双桨运动,负荷逐渐增加。使用 BSL 和 LS4 分析仪测量乳酸水平:结果:指尖 Bla 值明显高于耳垂值,平均偏差为 -0.66 mmol/L,在 4-8 mmol/L 范围内达到 -0.86 mmol/L。在耳垂,BSL 和 LS4-a 之间的最高 CCC 为 0.84(> 8 毫摩尔/升),BSL 和 LS4-b 之间的最高 CCC 为 0.85(> 8 毫摩尔/升)。在指尖,BSL 和 LS4-c 的最高 CCC 为 0.68(> 8 毫摩尔/升),BSL 和 LS4-d 的最高 CCC 为 0.52(> 8 毫摩尔/升)。比较耳垂处的 LS4-a 和 LS4-b,最高 CCC 为 0.83(0-4 毫摩尔/升)。在指尖,比较 LS4-c 和 LS4-d,最高 CCC 为 0.68(> 8 mmol/L):结论:SkiErg 双杆滑雪时,指尖的血液乳酸浓度高于耳垂。LS4 的可靠性较低,尤其是指尖处,因此建议使用耳垂和 BSL 分析仪进行精确测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1