Accuracy of vitality and sensibility testing in mature and immature anterior teeth: a clinical trial

Q3 Dentistry Evidence-based dentistry Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1038/s41432-024-01054-y
Mohammed Bux, Mohammed Adam
{"title":"Accuracy of vitality and sensibility testing in mature and immature anterior teeth: a clinical trial","authors":"Mohammed Bux, Mohammed Adam","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01054-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining the health the status of the pulp is crucial in treatment planning. Both sensibility and vitality testing techniques may be employed. Sensibility testing may be inaccurate in teeth with incomplete root apices. This study intends to compare the accuracy of cold testing (CT), electric pulp testing (EPT) and pulse oximetry (PO) in determining pulpal status of mature and immature anterior teeth. 20 mature and 20 immature maxillary permanent incisors of healthy 6–12-year-olds were included. Teeth were categorised as mature permanent central incisors, immature permanent central incisors, and a negative control group with endodontically treated incisors. Vitality and sensitivity tests were performed using EPT, CT, and PO, with measurements taken thrice per tooth. PO was measured with infant pulse oximetry probe sensors placed on the tooth surfaces and fingers. Descriptive statistics were computed, and data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Spearman correlation coefficient analysed correlations between dental and finger SpO2 measurements, while the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post-hoc analysis compared SpO2 and EPT measurements across tooth development stages, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. SpO2 values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.05), and both were significantly higher than in the negative control group. There was no significant correlation between SpO2 values measured from fingers and teeth. EPT values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.001). The accuracy rate of PO, EPT, and cold tests was 100% in this study, with no false positive or negative responses in the control group. The SpO2 values in mature and immature vital teeth ranged between 80–92%. PO is a reliable and non-invasive method for determining pulp vitality in both mature and immature teeth, comparable to traditional sensitivity tests like EPT and CT. PO can be considered an alternative vitality test, especially useful in paediatric dental patients due to its atraumatic and objective nature. Further studies with larger sample sizes and additional vitality tests like doppler flowmetry are recommended to enhance the clinical diagnosis of pulp vitality in anterior and posterior teeth.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 3","pages":"158-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01054-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining the health the status of the pulp is crucial in treatment planning. Both sensibility and vitality testing techniques may be employed. Sensibility testing may be inaccurate in teeth with incomplete root apices. This study intends to compare the accuracy of cold testing (CT), electric pulp testing (EPT) and pulse oximetry (PO) in determining pulpal status of mature and immature anterior teeth. 20 mature and 20 immature maxillary permanent incisors of healthy 6–12-year-olds were included. Teeth were categorised as mature permanent central incisors, immature permanent central incisors, and a negative control group with endodontically treated incisors. Vitality and sensitivity tests were performed using EPT, CT, and PO, with measurements taken thrice per tooth. PO was measured with infant pulse oximetry probe sensors placed on the tooth surfaces and fingers. Descriptive statistics were computed, and data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Spearman correlation coefficient analysed correlations between dental and finger SpO2 measurements, while the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post-hoc analysis compared SpO2 and EPT measurements across tooth development stages, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. SpO2 values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.05), and both were significantly higher than in the negative control group. There was no significant correlation between SpO2 values measured from fingers and teeth. EPT values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.001). The accuracy rate of PO, EPT, and cold tests was 100% in this study, with no false positive or negative responses in the control group. The SpO2 values in mature and immature vital teeth ranged between 80–92%. PO is a reliable and non-invasive method for determining pulp vitality in both mature and immature teeth, comparable to traditional sensitivity tests like EPT and CT. PO can be considered an alternative vitality test, especially useful in paediatric dental patients due to its atraumatic and objective nature. Further studies with larger sample sizes and additional vitality tests like doppler flowmetry are recommended to enhance the clinical diagnosis of pulp vitality in anterior and posterior teeth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成熟前牙和未成熟前牙活力和敏感度测试的准确性:一项临床试验。
简介确定牙髓的健康状况对于制定治疗计划至关重要。感度和活力测试技术均可使用。对于根尖不完整的牙齿,感度测试可能不准确。本研究旨在比较冷测试(CT)、电动牙髓测试(EPT)和脉搏血氧仪(PO)在确定成熟和不成熟前牙牙髓状态方面的准确性。牙齿分为成熟恒中切牙、未成熟恒中切牙和阴性对照组,阴性对照组的切牙经过牙髓治疗。使用 EPT、CT 和 PO 进行活力和敏感性测试,每颗牙齿测量三次。PO是通过放置在牙齿表面和手指上的婴儿脉搏氧饱和度探头传感器进行测量的。计算描述性统计,并使用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验法评估数据分布。Spearman 相关系数分析了牙齿和手指 SpO2 测量值之间的相关性,而 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Dunn 事后分析则比较了不同牙齿发育阶段的 SpO2 和 EPT 测量值,显著性阈值设定为 p 结果:未成熟牙齿的 SpO2 值明显高于成熟牙齿(p 2)。与成熟牙齿相比,未成熟牙齿的 EPT 值明显更高(成熟和未成熟重要牙齿的 p 2 值介于 80-92% 之间):牙髓活力测试是一种可靠、非侵入性的方法,可用于确定成熟牙和未成熟牙的牙髓活力,与传统的灵敏度测试(如 EPT 和 CT)不相上下。牙髓活力测试由于其无创伤和客观性,可被视为牙髓活力测试的替代方法,尤其适用于儿童牙科患者。建议进一步研究更大的样本量和更多的活力测试,如多普勒血流测量法,以加强对前、后牙牙髓活力的临床诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of school-based oral health education interventions on oral health status and oral hygiene behaviors among schoolchildren: an umbrella review. Does adopting a healthy diet improve periodontal parameters in patients susceptible to periodontal disease? A systematic review. Effectiveness of 'video-based interventions' of toothbrushing over other interventions on improvement of oral hygiene in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): a systematic review and meta-analysis. How can we remove erroneous penicillin allergy labels? Auxillary aids for pain and anxiety reduction during dental local anesthesia in pediatric patients: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1