首页 > 最新文献

Evidence-based dentistry最新文献

英文 中文
Do antibiotics prior to dental extractions reduce adverse post-operative outcomes?
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01093-5
Darshini Ramasubbu, Jonathan Lewney

Design: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduced or increased post-operative complications following dental extractions.

Sample selection: The cohort included 269,003 patients. In terms of participants, this sample consisted of Veteran Affairs Dental patients, who attended for a dental extraction between 01/01/2015- 31/12/2019. The intervention and comparator was whether or not patients had received an antibiotic prescription prior to their extraction, with the primary outcome a specified post-extraction complication (oral infection, dry socket or fever within 7 days of the extraction). Data was collected on patient demographics, medical history, and details regarding the extraction.

Data analysis: Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between antibiotic prescription prior to extraction and outcomes, alongside a sensitivity analysis that excluded antibiotics prescribed by a medical provider.

Results: The cohort included 269003 patients, who attended 385,880 dental visits. During 122,810 visits (31.8%), patients received antibiotics prior to extraction, with amoxicillin the most frequently prescribed. Antibiotics were more commonly prescribed in those who received a surgical extraction. In total, 3387 patients experienced a complication. Of these patients, 1272 had received antibiotics, compared with 2115 who had not. The regression analysis determined that diabetes was a statistically significant modifier of an association. For patients without diabetes, receiving antibiotics increased the odds of a post-extraction complication.

Conclusions: In this sample of older people, there was no association between being prescribed antibiotics and post-extraction complications.

{"title":"Do antibiotics prior to dental extractions reduce adverse post-operative outcomes?","authors":"Darshini Ramasubbu, Jonathan Lewney","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01093-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01093-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduced or increased post-operative complications following dental extractions.</p><p><strong>Sample selection: </strong>The cohort included 269,003 patients. In terms of participants, this sample consisted of Veteran Affairs Dental patients, who attended for a dental extraction between 01/01/2015- 31/12/2019. The intervention and comparator was whether or not patients had received an antibiotic prescription prior to their extraction, with the primary outcome a specified post-extraction complication (oral infection, dry socket or fever within 7 days of the extraction). Data was collected on patient demographics, medical history, and details regarding the extraction.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between antibiotic prescription prior to extraction and outcomes, alongside a sensitivity analysis that excluded antibiotics prescribed by a medical provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 269003 patients, who attended 385,880 dental visits. During 122,810 visits (31.8%), patients received antibiotics prior to extraction, with amoxicillin the most frequently prescribed. Antibiotics were more commonly prescribed in those who received a surgical extraction. In total, 3387 patients experienced a complication. Of these patients, 1272 had received antibiotics, compared with 2115 who had not. The regression analysis determined that diabetes was a statistically significant modifier of an association. For patients without diabetes, receiving antibiotics increased the odds of a post-extraction complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample of older people, there was no association between being prescribed antibiotics and post-extraction complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative evaluation of pit & fissure sealant retention using cotton roll & rubber dam isolation techniques - a systematic review & meta-analysis.
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01092-6
Neha Shukla, Zainab Akram, P G Naveen Kumar, Mahesh R Khairnar, Sachin Kumar Jadhav, Savitha Priyadarsini

Background: Isolation with cotton rolls does not always provide as complete isolation as rubber dam, especially in procedures where absolute moisture control is critical. Therefore, this review aims to summarize and analyze previous studies evaluating the retention and marginal integrity of pit & fissure sealant using rubber dam and cotton roll isolation techniques during dental treatment in children.

Material and methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, search yielded 1361 articles, with seven RCTs and one non-RCT design meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, sealant type, follow-up duration, retention rates, and caries incidence.

Results: The comparison of retention rate between rubber dam and cotton roll at six months difference was non-significant (OR:1.15; p = 0.64) while there was significant difference at 12 month (OR:2.23; p < 0.001). The difference for the marginal integrity was statistically significant at six months (OR:2.00; p = 0.03) while non-significant difference observed (OR:1.74; p = 0.10) at 12 months.

Conclusion: The sealant placed using a rubber dam as an isolation technique showed higher retention than the cotton roll after 12 months. In terms of marginal integrity, the performance of the rubber dam and cotton roll was equivalent at the end of 12 months.

{"title":"Comparative evaluation of pit & fissure sealant retention using cotton roll & rubber dam isolation techniques - a systematic review & meta-analysis.","authors":"Neha Shukla, Zainab Akram, P G Naveen Kumar, Mahesh R Khairnar, Sachin Kumar Jadhav, Savitha Priyadarsini","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01092-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01092-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isolation with cotton rolls does not always provide as complete isolation as rubber dam, especially in procedures where absolute moisture control is critical. Therefore, this review aims to summarize and analyze previous studies evaluating the retention and marginal integrity of pit & fissure sealant using rubber dam and cotton roll isolation techniques during dental treatment in children.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, search yielded 1361 articles, with seven RCTs and one non-RCT design meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, sealant type, follow-up duration, retention rates, and caries incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison of retention rate between rubber dam and cotton roll at six months difference was non-significant (OR:1.15; p = 0.64) while there was significant difference at 12 month (OR:2.23; p < 0.001). The difference for the marginal integrity was statistically significant at six months (OR:2.00; p = 0.03) while non-significant difference observed (OR:1.74; p = 0.10) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sealant placed using a rubber dam as an isolation technique showed higher retention than the cotton roll after 12 months. In terms of marginal integrity, the performance of the rubber dam and cotton roll was equivalent at the end of 12 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate implant placement and immediate loading in aesthetic zone-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01091-7
Reetika Gaddale, Ramesh Chowdhary, Sunil K Mishra, Kamal Sagar

Background: Type I immediate implant placement has its own advantages like reduced treatment time, number of surgeries and post-extraction bone loss, however, the presence of insufficiently keratinized mucosa poses a challenge for flap adaptation and hinders the achievement of primary stability. Additionally, scientific evidence supports the notion that post-extraction bone loss is a natural biological occurrence that can impact the success of treatments.

Objectives: The primary outcome was to find out the hard and soft tissues changes around the implant following immediate placement and immediate loading. The secondary outcome was to record the adverse events post implant placement such as infection during the course of healing and after restoration, implant failure which would include surgical and post restoration, and over- all success and survival rate of implant.

Material and methods: A detailed electronic literature search of the articles published in English language was undertaken in October 2023 on online search engines Medline/PubMed and Cochrane databases with no restriction on year of search to include studies on immediate implant placement and loading with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year. Weighted means of soft and hard tissue changes were obtained by the inverse variance method.

Results: A total of 16 studies were included. There was no difference in crestal bone levels in immediate or delayed implant placement with immediate provisionalization in the anterior maxilla. The peri-implant margin remained and no differences in papillary loss was seen when compared to the delayed implant placement cases. Papilla were more stable or showed less recession in flapless approach compared to full thickness flap approach. Among the studies which filled the GAP with bone graft materials, no significant changes were found in the bone level changes. In case of recession, immediate implant placement with provisionalization did result in approximately 1 mm less facial gingival recession compared with that in the group that had a socket graft. Implant related complications occurred more in immediate implant placement and provisionalization compared to delayed group. And almost similar implant success and survival rates were seen in comparison to delayed implant placement groups.

Conclusions: Despite the similar implant survival rates observed in comparison to delayed implant placement groups, more long-term studies are necessary to determine the success of immediate implant placement and immediate loading. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes.

{"title":"Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate implant placement and immediate loading in aesthetic zone-a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Reetika Gaddale, Ramesh Chowdhary, Sunil K Mishra, Kamal Sagar","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01091-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01091-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type I immediate implant placement has its own advantages like reduced treatment time, number of surgeries and post-extraction bone loss, however, the presence of insufficiently keratinized mucosa poses a challenge for flap adaptation and hinders the achievement of primary stability. Additionally, scientific evidence supports the notion that post-extraction bone loss is a natural biological occurrence that can impact the success of treatments.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary outcome was to find out the hard and soft tissues changes around the implant following immediate placement and immediate loading. The secondary outcome was to record the adverse events post implant placement such as infection during the course of healing and after restoration, implant failure which would include surgical and post restoration, and over- all success and survival rate of implant.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A detailed electronic literature search of the articles published in English language was undertaken in October 2023 on online search engines Medline/PubMed and Cochrane databases with no restriction on year of search to include studies on immediate implant placement and loading with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year. Weighted means of soft and hard tissue changes were obtained by the inverse variance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies were included. There was no difference in crestal bone levels in immediate or delayed implant placement with immediate provisionalization in the anterior maxilla. The peri-implant margin remained and no differences in papillary loss was seen when compared to the delayed implant placement cases. Papilla were more stable or showed less recession in flapless approach compared to full thickness flap approach. Among the studies which filled the GAP with bone graft materials, no significant changes were found in the bone level changes. In case of recession, immediate implant placement with provisionalization did result in approximately 1 mm less facial gingival recession compared with that in the group that had a socket graft. Implant related complications occurred more in immediate implant placement and provisionalization compared to delayed group. And almost similar implant success and survival rates were seen in comparison to delayed implant placement groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the similar implant survival rates observed in comparison to delayed implant placement groups, more long-term studies are necessary to determine the success of immediate implant placement and immediate loading. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of photobiomodulation with low-level lasers on the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: an umbrella review.
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01090-8
Oscar Mauricio Jiménez-Peña, Nestor Ríos-Osorio, Luz Andrea Velandia-Palacio, Gerardo Gómez-Moreno, Marggie Grajales

Introduction: Photobiomodulation (PBM) with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a non-invasive method for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). Several systematic reviews (SRs) have assessed the effectiveness of LLLT on OTM acceleration. However, the interpretations and analysis of the findings of these SRs are inconclusive and inconsistent due to the substantial heterogeneity of their results, mainly due to the wide variety of parameters employed in the primary studies. This umbrella review (UR) aims to (i) Evaluate and summarize the findings of SRs evaluating the effect of LLLT on OTM acceleration. (ii) Suggest an evidence-based protocol with the most predictable application LLLT parameters for OTM acceleration.

Methods: Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 2023. AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS were used to evaluate methodological quality and risk of bias respectively.

Results: Six SRs met the inclusion criteria. All the SRs suggest that PBM with LLLT tends to be effective in accelerating OTM. However, the high heterogeneity of SRs hinders a precise evaluation of the LLLT's effect on OTM acceleration. The parameters most associated with OTM acceleration are LLLT frequency: At least twice a month, irradiation points: 4-10 points, irradiation time per point: 3-50 s, output power: 20-150 mW, energy density: 5.3 J/cm2 and wavelength range:780-810 nm. The risk of bias assessment identified that 50% of the included SR had a risk of bias ranging from uncertain to high. Similarly, three SRs obtained a "Critically low-quality" assessment.

Conclusions: Although, all the SRs included in this UR suggest that LLLT may accelerate OTM in comparison to control groups. The primary goal of future studies examining the influence of LLLT on the acceleration of OTM should be to create standardised protocols for the use of LLLT, allowing the development of more predictable therapies. The research protocol was registered on the Prospero CRD42024497420.

{"title":"Effectiveness of photobiomodulation with low-level lasers on the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: an umbrella review.","authors":"Oscar Mauricio Jiménez-Peña, Nestor Ríos-Osorio, Luz Andrea Velandia-Palacio, Gerardo Gómez-Moreno, Marggie Grajales","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01090-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01090-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Photobiomodulation (PBM) with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a non-invasive method for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). Several systematic reviews (SRs) have assessed the effectiveness of LLLT on OTM acceleration. However, the interpretations and analysis of the findings of these SRs are inconclusive and inconsistent due to the substantial heterogeneity of their results, mainly due to the wide variety of parameters employed in the primary studies. This umbrella review (UR) aims to (i) Evaluate and summarize the findings of SRs evaluating the effect of LLLT on OTM acceleration. (ii) Suggest an evidence-based protocol with the most predictable application LLLT parameters for OTM acceleration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 2023. AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS were used to evaluate methodological quality and risk of bias respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six SRs met the inclusion criteria. All the SRs suggest that PBM with LLLT tends to be effective in accelerating OTM. However, the high heterogeneity of SRs hinders a precise evaluation of the LLLT's effect on OTM acceleration. The parameters most associated with OTM acceleration are LLLT frequency: At least twice a month, irradiation points: 4-10 points, irradiation time per point: 3-50 s, output power: 20-150 mW, energy density: 5.3 J/cm2 and wavelength range:780-810 nm. The risk of bias assessment identified that 50% of the included SR had a risk of bias ranging from uncertain to high. Similarly, three SRs obtained a \"Critically low-quality\" assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although, all the SRs included in this UR suggest that LLLT may accelerate OTM in comparison to control groups. The primary goal of future studies examining the influence of LLLT on the acceleration of OTM should be to create standardised protocols for the use of LLLT, allowing the development of more predictable therapies. The research protocol was registered on the Prospero CRD42024497420.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Applications of AI-based deep learning models for detecting dental caries on intraoral images - a systematic review.
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01089-1
Ayesha Noor Uddin, Syed Ahmed Ali, Abhishek Lal, Niha Adnan, Syed Muhammad Faizan Ahmed, Fahad Umer

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Deep Learning (DL) models in the detection of dental caries on intraoral images.

Methods: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines conducting an electronic search on PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases for retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies published till 1st June 2024. Methodological and performance metrics of clinical studies utilizing DL models were assessed. A modified QUADAS risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment.

Results: Out of 273 studies identified, a total of 23 were included with 19 studies having a low risk and 4 studies having a high risk of bias. Overall accuracy ranged from 56% to 99.1%, sensitivity ranged from 23% to 98% and specificity ranged from 65.7% to 100%. Only 3 studies utilized explainable AI (XAI) techniques for caries detection. A total of 4 studies exhibited a level 4 deployment status by developing mobile or web-based applications.

Conclusion: AI-based DL models have demonstrated promising prospects in enhancing the detection of dental caries, especially in terms of low-resource settings. However, there is a need for future deployed studies to enhance the AI models to improve their real-world applications.

{"title":"Applications of AI-based deep learning models for detecting dental caries on intraoral images - a systematic review.","authors":"Ayesha Noor Uddin, Syed Ahmed Ali, Abhishek Lal, Niha Adnan, Syed Muhammad Faizan Ahmed, Fahad Umer","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01089-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01089-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Deep Learning (DL) models in the detection of dental caries on intraoral images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines conducting an electronic search on PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases for retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies published till 1st June 2024. Methodological and performance metrics of clinical studies utilizing DL models were assessed. A modified QUADAS risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 273 studies identified, a total of 23 were included with 19 studies having a low risk and 4 studies having a high risk of bias. Overall accuracy ranged from 56% to 99.1%, sensitivity ranged from 23% to 98% and specificity ranged from 65.7% to 100%. Only 3 studies utilized explainable AI (XAI) techniques for caries detection. A total of 4 studies exhibited a level 4 deployment status by developing mobile or web-based applications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-based DL models have demonstrated promising prospects in enhancing the detection of dental caries, especially in terms of low-resource settings. However, there is a need for future deployed studies to enhance the AI models to improve their real-world applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142750445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nutrition and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 老年人的营养与口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL):系统回顾与荟萃分析。
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01088-2
Neha Chauhan, Sarah Paul, Bharathi M Purohit, Ritu Duggal, Harsh Priya, Sasidharan S

Background: Understanding the interplay between nutrition and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in older adults is crucial amidst the global aging population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore this association, recognizing the growing prevalence of older individuals and the imperative of addressing their health needs for enhanced well-being.

Materials and methodology: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, relevant studies were identified through electronic database searches and manual screening. Included were studies investigating the relationship between nutritional status, assessed via the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), and OHRQoL in individuals aged 60 years and older. Quality assessment adhered to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria, and statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Version 3.

Results: Out of 566 initial records, 14 full-text articles were assessed, with 4 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. A consistent association emerged between lower nutritional assessment scores and poor OHRQoL among the older adults. Significant relationships were identified between poor oral health indicators, as measured by GOHAI, and an elevated risk of malnutrition. Particularly noteworthy was the role of negative self-perception of oral health as a significant predictor of nutritional deficits, emphasizing the importance of OHRQoL instruments in complementing clinical measurements.

Discussion: The findings underscore the predictive capacity of oral health indicators in assessing nutritional well-being in older individuals. Despite previous studies reporting mixed findings, this review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the association between nutrition and OHRQoL, highlighting the significance of addressing oral health concerns to enhance overall nutritional outcomes in the older adult population.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize the significant association between nutrition and OHRQoL among older adults. Highlighting the importance OHRQoL instruments that can complement objective clinical measurements and serve as predictors of malnutrition, particularly among this population. Offering vital insights for stakeholders, policymakers, and public health officials to promote the overall well-being and quality of life of older adults.

背景:在全球人口老龄化的背景下,了解老年人营养与口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)之间的相互作用至关重要。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨这种关联,同时认识到老年人的发病率越来越高,必须满足他们的健康需求以提高他们的幸福感:根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,通过电子数据库搜索和人工筛选确定了相关研究。纳入的研究调查了通过老年口腔健康评估指数(GOHAI)评估的 60 岁及以上人群的营养状况与 OHRQoL 之间的关系。根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的标准进行质量评估,并使用综合元分析软件 3.0 版进行统计分析:在 566 条初始记录中,评估了 14 篇全文文章,其中 4 项研究符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。老年人较低的营养评估得分与较差的 OHRQoL 之间存在一致的关联。根据 GOHAI 测量,口腔健康指标较差与营养不良风险升高之间存在显著关系。尤其值得注意的是,对口腔健康的负面自我认知是营养不良的重要预测因素,这强调了口腔健康状况质量生活工具在补充临床测量方面的重要性:讨论:研究结果强调了口腔健康指标在评估老年人营养状况方面的预测能力。尽管以前的研究报告结果不一,但本综述有助于全面了解营养与 OHRQoL 之间的关系,突出了解决口腔健康问题对提高老年人总体营养状况的重要意义:本系统综述和荟萃分析强调了老年人营养与 OHRQoL 之间的重要关联。强调了口腔健康、高质生活工具的重要性,这些工具可以补充客观的临床测量结果,并可作为营养不良的预测指标,尤其是在老年人群中。为利益相关者、政策制定者和公共卫生官员提供重要见解,以促进老年人的整体福祉和生活质量。
{"title":"Nutrition and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Neha Chauhan, Sarah Paul, Bharathi M Purohit, Ritu Duggal, Harsh Priya, Sasidharan S","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01088-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01088-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the interplay between nutrition and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in older adults is crucial amidst the global aging population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore this association, recognizing the growing prevalence of older individuals and the imperative of addressing their health needs for enhanced well-being.</p><p><strong>Materials and methodology: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, relevant studies were identified through electronic database searches and manual screening. Included were studies investigating the relationship between nutritional status, assessed via the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), and OHRQoL in individuals aged 60 years and older. Quality assessment adhered to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria, and statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Version 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 566 initial records, 14 full-text articles were assessed, with 4 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. A consistent association emerged between lower nutritional assessment scores and poor OHRQoL among the older adults. Significant relationships were identified between poor oral health indicators, as measured by GOHAI, and an elevated risk of malnutrition. Particularly noteworthy was the role of negative self-perception of oral health as a significant predictor of nutritional deficits, emphasizing the importance of OHRQoL instruments in complementing clinical measurements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings underscore the predictive capacity of oral health indicators in assessing nutritional well-being in older individuals. Despite previous studies reporting mixed findings, this review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the association between nutrition and OHRQoL, highlighting the significance of addressing oral health concerns to enhance overall nutritional outcomes in the older adult population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize the significant association between nutrition and OHRQoL among older adults. Highlighting the importance OHRQoL instruments that can complement objective clinical measurements and serve as predictors of malnutrition, particularly among this population. Offering vital insights for stakeholders, policymakers, and public health officials to promote the overall well-being and quality of life of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142738915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact antibiotic prescribing patterns among dentists? COVID-19 大流行是否影响了牙科医生的抗生素处方模式?
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01087-3
Akshani Patel, Satish Kumar
Patient records from Wits Oral Health Centre were collected over two years (March 2019–March 2021). The records were divided into two groups: pre-COVID-19 (March 2019–March 2020) and COVID-19 (March 2020–March 2021). The total sample size was 698 systematically selected patient records who received antibiotics. A systematic random sampling method was used to select a sample of patients who received prescriptions for antibiotics. Patients were included based on their treatment time and need for antibiotic prescription. Patients whose records were missing information or treated by independent private practitioners for whom records access was not feasible were excluded. The extracted data contained information regarding the patients’ demographics, medical histories, dental condition, dental procedure, antibiotic type, frequency, dosage, duration of use, and prescribers’ disciplines. The information was categorized and captured in Microsoft Excel to analyze and create figures and tables. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared, and z-tests to compare pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 prescription patterns in RStudio. From an initial pool of 44,067 patient consultations, a systematic random sample of 698 records met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study. The sample was divided between pre-COVID-19 (n = 350) and COVID-19 (n = 348). A significant increase in antibiotic prescriptions was found during COVID-19 (1571 prescriptions) compared to pre-COVID-19 (1109 prescriptions). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin and metronidazole. Specifically, amoxicillin was used in most cases before and during COVID-19. The combination of amoxicillin with metronidazole increased from 16.6% pre-COVID-19 to 24.4% COVID-19. It was found that many of the antibiotics prescribed from both periods were not clinically indicated (53.1% pre-COVID-19 and 54.3% COVID-19). The authors concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased antibiotic prescriptions despite fewer in-person consultations. This was likely due to insufficient surgical intervention and reliance on antibiotics to treat dental conditions. The lack of proper antibiotic use raises concerns regarding dental practitioners’ appropriate use of antibiotics. There is an urgent need for improved antibiotic stewardship to prevent the misuse and growing public health issue of antimicrobial resistance.
数据来源:收集了 Wits 口腔健康中心两年内(2019 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月)的患者记录。记录分为两组:COVID-19 前(2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月)和 COVID-19(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月)。总样本量为 698 份系统选取的接受过抗生素治疗的患者病历:研究选取:采用系统随机抽样法选取开具抗生素处方的患者样本。根据患者的治疗时间和对抗生素处方的需求将其纳入样本。记录信息缺失的患者或由独立私人医生治疗而无法获取记录的患者被排除在外:提取的数据包括患者的人口统计学、病史、牙科状况、牙科手术、抗生素类型、频率、剂量、使用时间以及处方者的学科等信息。这些信息被归类并录入 Microsoft Excel 进行分析和制作图表。在 RStudio 中使用描述性统计、卡方和 z 检验进行分析,以比较 COVID-19 前和 COVID-19 后的处方模式:在最初的 44,067 份患者咨询中,有 698 份系统随机样本符合纳入本研究的资格标准。样本分为 COVID-19 前(n = 350)和 COVID-19 后(n = 348)。与 COVID-19 前(1109 份处方)相比,COVID-19 期间的抗生素处方量(1571 份处方)明显增加。最常处方的抗生素是阿莫西林和甲硝唑。具体而言,在 COVID-19 之前和期间,阿莫西林被用于大多数病例。阿莫西林与甲硝唑联用的比例从 COVID-19 前的 16.6% 增加到 COVID-19 期间的 24.4%。研究发现,在这两个时期开出的抗生素处方中,很多都没有临床指征(COVID-19 之前为 53.1%,COVID-19 期间为 54.3%):作者得出结论:COVID-19 大流行期间,尽管亲诊人数减少,但抗生素处方却显著增加。这可能是由于手术干预不足以及依赖抗生素治疗牙科疾病所致。缺乏适当的抗生素使用引起了人们对牙科医生适当使用抗生素的担忧。目前迫切需要改进抗生素管理,以防止抗生素的滥用和日益严重的抗菌药耐药性这一公共卫生问题。
{"title":"Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact antibiotic prescribing patterns among dentists?","authors":"Akshani Patel,&nbsp;Satish Kumar","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01087-3","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41432-024-01087-3","url":null,"abstract":"Patient records from Wits Oral Health Centre were collected over two years (March 2019–March 2021). The records were divided into two groups: pre-COVID-19 (March 2019–March 2020) and COVID-19 (March 2020–March 2021). The total sample size was 698 systematically selected patient records who received antibiotics. A systematic random sampling method was used to select a sample of patients who received prescriptions for antibiotics. Patients were included based on their treatment time and need for antibiotic prescription. Patients whose records were missing information or treated by independent private practitioners for whom records access was not feasible were excluded. The extracted data contained information regarding the patients’ demographics, medical histories, dental condition, dental procedure, antibiotic type, frequency, dosage, duration of use, and prescribers’ disciplines. The information was categorized and captured in Microsoft Excel to analyze and create figures and tables. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared, and z-tests to compare pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 prescription patterns in RStudio. From an initial pool of 44,067 patient consultations, a systematic random sample of 698 records met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study. The sample was divided between pre-COVID-19 (n = 350) and COVID-19 (n = 348). A significant increase in antibiotic prescriptions was found during COVID-19 (1571 prescriptions) compared to pre-COVID-19 (1109 prescriptions). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin and metronidazole. Specifically, amoxicillin was used in most cases before and during COVID-19. The combination of amoxicillin with metronidazole increased from 16.6% pre-COVID-19 to 24.4% COVID-19. It was found that many of the antibiotics prescribed from both periods were not clinically indicated (53.1% pre-COVID-19 and 54.3% COVID-19). The authors concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased antibiotic prescriptions despite fewer in-person consultations. This was likely due to insufficient surgical intervention and reliance on antibiotics to treat dental conditions. The lack of proper antibiotic use raises concerns regarding dental practitioners’ appropriate use of antibiotics. There is an urgent need for improved antibiotic stewardship to prevent the misuse and growing public health issue of antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"208-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01087-3.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142681167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antibiotics as adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy in diabetic patients 抗生素作为糖尿病患者非手术牙周治疗的辅助手段。
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01085-5
Lata Goyal, Shipra Gupta, Yeshwanth Perambudhuru
A comprehensive literature search was performed via MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, including all relevant publications accessed on March 2023 and subsequently updated up to July 2024. Additionally, grey literature was searched, and there was no restriction on publication data and languages. All randomized clinical trials comparing topical/systemic antibiotics as an adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP) with SRP alone for the treatment of diabetic patients with periodontitis were included. Literature reviews, case reports and series, preclinical studies or studies lacking periodontal data were excluded. Clinical attachment level was considered as the primary outcome. Bleeding on probing, pocket depth, and gingival index were the secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool, and for each domain, bias risk was judged as low, unclear and high risk of bias. Selection, removing duplicates, screening, extracting data, and assessing the quality of studies were done by two investigators and findings were tabulated. Meta-analysis was conducted, generating forest plots to compare different treatment modalities, time periods, and antibiotic types. Key periodontal parameters such as probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were analysed. Upon screening and further evaluation of 690 articles, 43 were considered for full-text eligibility. Finally, 30 studies were included in the systematic review, and 27 were included in meta-analysis. Out of 30 randomized clinical trials, 9 studies focused on topical and antibiotics, and 21 involved systemic administration of antibiotics. Five of the nine studies focussing on topical administration of antibiotics, were classified as having a low risk of bias and four as having a high risk of bias. Out of 21 studies on systemic antibiotics, eight were classified as having a low risk of bias, two were undefined, and eleven showed a high risk of bias. Authors concluded that adjunctive use of antibiotics could lead to improvement in periodontal clinical parameters The findings showed that the adjunctive use of antibiotics led to slight improvements in clinical outcomes. However, keeping in mind antibiotic resistance, and side effects of antibiotics, their use should be approached cautiously and only when necessary.
数据来源:通过MEDLINE/PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行了全面的文献检索,包括2023年3月访问的所有相关出版物,以及随后更新至2024年7月的所有相关出版物。此外,还检索了灰色文献,对出版数据和语言没有限制:所有随机临床试验均被纳入,这些试验比较了局部/全身抗生素作为洗牙和根面规划(SRP)的辅助手段与单独使用SRP治疗糖尿病牙周炎患者的效果。文献综述、病例报告和系列研究、临床前研究或缺乏牙周数据的研究均被排除在外。临床附着水平被视为主要结果。数据提取与综合:使用 Cochrane 协作工具对偏倚风险进行评估,每个领域的偏倚风险分为低偏倚风险、不明确偏倚风险和高偏倚风险。选择、删除重复、筛选、提取数据和评估研究质量的工作由两名研究人员完成,并将结果制成表格。进行了元分析,生成森林图来比较不同的治疗方式、时间段和抗生素类型。对探诊袋深度(PPD)、临床附着水平(CAL)、菌斑指数(PI)和探诊出血(BoP)等关键牙周参数进行了分析:经过对 690 篇文章的筛选和进一步评估,43 篇文章被认为符合全文资格。最后,30 项研究被纳入系统综述,27 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。在 30 项随机临床试验中,9 项研究侧重于局部使用抗生素,21 项研究涉及全身使用抗生素。9 项研究中,5 项侧重于局部使用抗生素,被归类为偏倚风险较低,4 项偏倚风险较高。在 21 项关于全身使用抗生素的研究中,有 8 项研究的偏倚风险较低,2 项研究的偏倚风险未确定,11 项研究的偏倚风险较高。作者认为,辅助使用抗生素可改善牙周临床参数 结论:研究结果表明,辅助使用抗生素可略微改善临床结果。然而,考虑到抗生素的耐药性和副作用,只有在必要时才应谨慎使用抗生素。
{"title":"Antibiotics as adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy in diabetic patients","authors":"Lata Goyal,&nbsp;Shipra Gupta,&nbsp;Yeshwanth Perambudhuru","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01085-5","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41432-024-01085-5","url":null,"abstract":"A comprehensive literature search was performed via MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, including all relevant publications accessed on March 2023 and subsequently updated up to July 2024. Additionally, grey literature was searched, and there was no restriction on publication data and languages. All randomized clinical trials comparing topical/systemic antibiotics as an adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP) with SRP alone for the treatment of diabetic patients with periodontitis were included. Literature reviews, case reports and series, preclinical studies or studies lacking periodontal data were excluded. Clinical attachment level was considered as the primary outcome. Bleeding on probing, pocket depth, and gingival index were the secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool, and for each domain, bias risk was judged as low, unclear and high risk of bias. Selection, removing duplicates, screening, extracting data, and assessing the quality of studies were done by two investigators and findings were tabulated. Meta-analysis was conducted, generating forest plots to compare different treatment modalities, time periods, and antibiotic types. Key periodontal parameters such as probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were analysed. Upon screening and further evaluation of 690 articles, 43 were considered for full-text eligibility. Finally, 30 studies were included in the systematic review, and 27 were included in meta-analysis. Out of 30 randomized clinical trials, 9 studies focused on topical and antibiotics, and 21 involved systemic administration of antibiotics. Five of the nine studies focussing on topical administration of antibiotics, were classified as having a low risk of bias and four as having a high risk of bias. Out of 21 studies on systemic antibiotics, eight were classified as having a low risk of bias, two were undefined, and eleven showed a high risk of bias. Authors concluded that adjunctive use of antibiotics could lead to improvement in periodontal clinical parameters The findings showed that the adjunctive use of antibiotics led to slight improvements in clinical outcomes. However, keeping in mind antibiotic resistance, and side effects of antibiotics, their use should be approached cautiously and only when necessary.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"202-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01085-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reevaluating antibiotic prophylaxis: insights from a network meta-analysis on dry socket and surgical site infections 重新评估抗生素预防措施:干眦和手术部位感染网络荟萃分析的启示。
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01067-7
Tayebe Rojhanian, Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi, Amin Vahdati
Three databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) were searched in December 2021 for 16 Randomised Clinical Trials (RCTs). Three reviewers reviewed the articles on oral antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) and dry socket (DS) after lower third molar (L3M) extraction using the PICO framework. From 1999 to 2021, RCTs involving healthy patients undergoing L3M extraction with ABP, placebo, or no therapy were included. Adverse effects (AEs) associated with antibiotic usage, along with the main outcomes (DS and SSI), were also documented. Three independent investigators selected articles based on pre-established inclusion criteria, with any disagreements resolved by consensus or additional researchers. PRISMA guidelines were followed, involving initial title and abstract screening, followed by full-text evaluation. Exclusion reasons were documented, and the most recent report was included when multiple reports on the same patients were found, with no language restrictions applied. Two investigators evaluated studies quality and quality of evidence respectively using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and GRADEpro GDT. They independently extracted data, focusing on the type of extraction and the number of extracted L3M. They also detailed the use of antibiotics, including dosage, dosage regimen, timing, and duration. Among 16 articles, 15 used a parallel arm design, while one used a crossover design. The antibiotics studied included Amoxicillin+Clavulanic acid (7 articles), Amoxicillin (6), Metronidazole (2), Azithromycin (1), and Clindamycin (2), all compared with no treatment or placebo. A pairwise meta-analysis was used to combine studies with equivalent treatment (direct estimation), and a network meta-analysis compared outcome variables across different treatments (indirect comparison). Two included articles had a low risk of bias and the level of evidence was low according to GRADE. Pooled results supported the use of antibiotics to reduce DS and SSI following L3M extraction with a number needed to treat 25 and 18, respectively. Despite the fact that ABP reduces the risk of DS and SSI, it is recommended to consider systemic conditions and individual patient risk factors before prescribing antibiotics, due to global health threat.
数据来源:2021 年 12 月,我们在三个数据库(MEDLINE、Cochrane Library 和 Scopus)中检索了 16 项随机临床试验 (RCT):三位审稿人采用 PICO 框架审查了有关口服抗生素预防法 (ABP) 预防下第三磨牙 (L3M) 拔除术后手术部位感染 (SSI) 和干槽症 (DS) 的文章。研究纳入了 1999 年至 2021 年期间进行下第三磨牙拔除术的健康患者接受 ABP、安慰剂或无治疗的 RCT 研究。研究还记录了与抗生素使用相关的不良反应(AEs)以及主要结果(DS和SSI):三位独立研究人员根据事先制定的纳入标准筛选文章,如有任何分歧,则通过协商一致或其他研究人员解决。研究人员遵循 PRISMA 指南,首先对文章标题和摘要进行筛选,然后对全文进行评估。对排除原因进行记录,当发现关于同一患者的多份报告时,则纳入最新报告,且无语言限制。两名研究人员分别使用 Cochrane 协作工具和 GRADEpro GDT 评估研究质量和证据质量。他们独立提取数据,重点关注提取类型和提取的 L3M 数量。他们还详细介绍了抗生素的使用情况,包括剂量、剂量方案、时间和持续时间。在 16 篇文章中,15 篇采用平行臂设计,1 篇采用交叉设计。研究的抗生素包括阿莫西林+克拉维酸(7 篇文章)、阿莫西林(6 篇文章)、甲硝唑(2 篇文章)、阿奇霉素(1 篇文章)和克林霉素(2 篇文章),所有抗生素均与无治疗或安慰剂进行了比较。采用配对荟萃分析将治疗方法相同的研究合并在一起(直接估计),并采用网络荟萃分析比较不同治疗方法的结果变量(间接比较):纳入的两篇文章偏倚风险较低,根据GRADE标准,证据水平较低。汇总结果支持使用抗生素减少L3M拔管后的DS和SSI,治疗需要量分别为25和18:尽管 ABP 可降低 DS 和 SSI 的风险,但鉴于全球健康威胁,建议在处方抗生素前考虑全身情况和患者的个体风险因素。
{"title":"Reevaluating antibiotic prophylaxis: insights from a network meta-analysis on dry socket and surgical site infections","authors":"Tayebe Rojhanian,&nbsp;Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi,&nbsp;Amin Vahdati","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01067-7","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41432-024-01067-7","url":null,"abstract":"Three databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) were searched in December 2021 for 16 Randomised Clinical Trials (RCTs). Three reviewers reviewed the articles on oral antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) and dry socket (DS) after lower third molar (L3M) extraction using the PICO framework. From 1999 to 2021, RCTs involving healthy patients undergoing L3M extraction with ABP, placebo, or no therapy were included. Adverse effects (AEs) associated with antibiotic usage, along with the main outcomes (DS and SSI), were also documented. Three independent investigators selected articles based on pre-established inclusion criteria, with any disagreements resolved by consensus or additional researchers. PRISMA guidelines were followed, involving initial title and abstract screening, followed by full-text evaluation. Exclusion reasons were documented, and the most recent report was included when multiple reports on the same patients were found, with no language restrictions applied. Two investigators evaluated studies quality and quality of evidence respectively using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and GRADEpro GDT. They independently extracted data, focusing on the type of extraction and the number of extracted L3M. They also detailed the use of antibiotics, including dosage, dosage regimen, timing, and duration. Among 16 articles, 15 used a parallel arm design, while one used a crossover design. The antibiotics studied included Amoxicillin+Clavulanic acid (7 articles), Amoxicillin (6), Metronidazole (2), Azithromycin (1), and Clindamycin (2), all compared with no treatment or placebo. A pairwise meta-analysis was used to combine studies with equivalent treatment (direct estimation), and a network meta-analysis compared outcome variables across different treatments (indirect comparison). Two included articles had a low risk of bias and the level of evidence was low according to GRADE. Pooled results supported the use of antibiotics to reduce DS and SSI following L3M extraction with a number needed to treat 25 and 18, respectively. Despite the fact that ABP reduces the risk of DS and SSI, it is recommended to consider systemic conditions and individual patient risk factors before prescribing antibiotics, due to global health threat.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"178-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01067-7.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic antimicrobials as an adjunct in the management of periodontitis – which drug is best? 全身用抗菌药作为牙周炎治疗的辅助手段--哪种药物最好?
Q3 Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01084-6
Ellis Hayes, Ryan McSorley
This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assesses systemic antimicrobials: azithromycin (AZT) and amoxicillin/metronidazole (AMX/MTZ), as adjuvants to subgingival instrumentation in the treatment of periodontitis. The aim is to establish if one antimicrobial is superior as an adjuvant therapy in the management of periodontal disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and prospective and retrospective human studies. Participants had to be adults (≥18 years of age) with a diagnosis of periodontitis in the categories: chronic/aggressive, stages II/III, grades B/C. All participants completed full mouth subgingival instrumentation (SI) with the use of adjunct systemic antimicrobial therapy: the intervention group: AZT and the control group: AMX/MTZ. A total of 779 studies were retrieved from the data search; following the application of selection criteria and independent review duplicated by two authors, seven studies were eligible for review. Two studies were subsequently excluded due to insufficient information. Therefore five studies were included in the review, all were self-funded and four were conducted in recognised universities. The primary outcome measure was probing pocket depth changes at 1–12 months. Secondary outcome measures were: the number of residual sites with pocket depths ≥5 mm, clinical attachment levels, bleeding on probing, plaque indices (at 1–12 months), and occurrence of adverse events. Review Manager Software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to conduct meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was expected, therefore the random-effects model was utilised to pool results from multiple studies. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and Cochrane’s test for heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence was assessed and a summary of GRADE criteria: risk of bias, inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias. Bias was graded for the five studies included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. Two studies were low risk, two were moderate risk and one was high risk. The study rated high for risk of bias was due to an incomplete description of blinding. Three of the studies were rated low bias for outcome measurement as they reported blinding of data assessors. No studies had deviations from the intended interventions and all outcomes were detected; therefore, all studies were rated as low bias for these domains. All five of the studies demonstrated changing in probing pocket depths at 1–3 months, however, the intervention and control cohorts showed no significant difference. One study showed a statistically significant difference in probing pocket depths at 12 months, in favour of AZT. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts: AZT and AMX/MTZ for mean changes in clinical attachment level, probing pocket depths
设计:本研究是一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,评估了阿奇霉素(AZT)和阿莫西林/甲硝唑(AMX/MTZ)这两种系统性抗菌药作为龈下器械治疗牙周炎的辅助药物。研究的目的是确定在牙周病的治疗中,是否有一种抗菌药作为辅助疗法更具优势:本系统综述和荟萃分析包括随机对照试验(RCT)、临床对照试验以及前瞻性和回顾性人类研究。参与者必须是成年人(≥18 岁),且诊断为慢性/侵袭性、II/III 期、B/C 级牙周炎。所有参与者都完成了全口龈下器械治疗(SI),并使用辅助系统抗菌疗法:干预组:AZT;对照组:AZT:干预组:AZT;对照组:AMX/MTZ:AMX/MTZ。数据搜索共检索到 779 项研究;在应用筛选标准并由两位作者重复进行独立审查后,有 7 项研究符合审查条件。随后,有两项研究因信息不足而被排除。因此,有五项研究被纳入审查范围,所有研究都是自筹资金进行的,其中四项研究是在公认的大学进行的:主要结果指标是1-12个月时探诊袋深度的变化。次要结果指标包括:袋深≥5 毫米的残留部位数量、临床附着水平、探诊出血量、斑块指数(1-12 个月时)和不良事件发生率。使用Review Manager软件(The Cochrane Collaboration,丹麦哥本哈根)进行荟萃分析。预计研究之间存在异质性,因此采用随机效应模型来汇总多项研究的结果。统计异质性通过 I2 和 Cochrane 的异质性检验进行评估。对证据的确定性进行了评估,并总结了 GRADE 标准:偏倚风险、不一致性、不精确性、间接性和发表偏倚。对纳入本次荟萃分析和系统综述的五项研究进行了偏倚分级。两项研究为低风险,两项为中度风险,一项为高度风险。被评为高偏倚风险的研究是由于盲法描述不完整。其中三项研究的结果测量偏倚风险被评为低,因为它们报告了数据评估者的盲法。没有研究偏离了预期的干预措施,而且所有结果都被检测到;因此,所有研究在这些方面都被评为低偏倚:所有五项研究都表明,探查袋深度在 1-3 个月时发生了变化,但干预组和对照组没有明显差异。一项研究显示,12 个月时探查袋深度的差异具有统计学意义,AZT 更胜一筹。这项系统回顾和荟萃分析表明,两个队列之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异:AZT和AMX/MTZ在1-3个月的临床附着水平、探诊袋深度或探诊出血的平均变化方面,在作为机械干预治疗牙周炎的辅助手段时,没有统计学意义上的差异。根据低度至中度确定性证据的记录,AZT队列的不良反应较少,1-3个月时探诊袋残留深度≥5毫米的部位也较少:根据这项系统综述和荟萃分析,在牙周病患者的辅助治疗中,使用 AZT 与 AMX/MTZ 相比,在统计学上没有明显的药物治疗优势。不过,中低度确定性证据显示,与 AMX/MTZ 相比,AZT 组群的不良反应较少,1-3 个月时残留牙周袋深度≥5 毫米的部位也较少。未来将有更多的临床试验和更强大的证据基础来验证目前的研究结果。
{"title":"Systemic antimicrobials as an adjunct in the management of periodontitis – which drug is best?","authors":"Ellis Hayes,&nbsp;Ryan McSorley","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01084-6","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41432-024-01084-6","url":null,"abstract":"This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assesses systemic antimicrobials: azithromycin (AZT) and amoxicillin/metronidazole (AMX/MTZ), as adjuvants to subgingival instrumentation in the treatment of periodontitis. The aim is to establish if one antimicrobial is superior as an adjuvant therapy in the management of periodontal disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and prospective and retrospective human studies. Participants had to be adults (≥18 years of age) with a diagnosis of periodontitis in the categories: chronic/aggressive, stages II/III, grades B/C. All participants completed full mouth subgingival instrumentation (SI) with the use of adjunct systemic antimicrobial therapy: the intervention group: AZT and the control group: AMX/MTZ. A total of 779 studies were retrieved from the data search; following the application of selection criteria and independent review duplicated by two authors, seven studies were eligible for review. Two studies were subsequently excluded due to insufficient information. Therefore five studies were included in the review, all were self-funded and four were conducted in recognised universities. The primary outcome measure was probing pocket depth changes at 1–12 months. Secondary outcome measures were: the number of residual sites with pocket depths ≥5 mm, clinical attachment levels, bleeding on probing, plaque indices (at 1–12 months), and occurrence of adverse events. Review Manager Software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to conduct meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was expected, therefore the random-effects model was utilised to pool results from multiple studies. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and Cochrane’s test for heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence was assessed and a summary of GRADE criteria: risk of bias, inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias. Bias was graded for the five studies included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. Two studies were low risk, two were moderate risk and one was high risk. The study rated high for risk of bias was due to an incomplete description of blinding. Three of the studies were rated low bias for outcome measurement as they reported blinding of data assessors. No studies had deviations from the intended interventions and all outcomes were detected; therefore, all studies were rated as low bias for these domains. All five of the studies demonstrated changing in probing pocket depths at 1–3 months, however, the intervention and control cohorts showed no significant difference. One study showed a statistically significant difference in probing pocket depths at 12 months, in favour of AZT. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts: AZT and AMX/MTZ for mean changes in clinical attachment level, probing pocket depths","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"198-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01084-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1