Association between new insertion of a long-term enteral feeding tube and mortality in adults admitted to the hospital with aspiration: A retrospective cohort study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1002/jpen.2680
Anthony D. Bai MD, MSc, Siddhartha Srivastava MD, MSc, Marie Leung MD, Heather Johnson MD, Amol A. Verma MD, MPhil, Fahad Razak MD, MSc
{"title":"Association between new insertion of a long-term enteral feeding tube and mortality in adults admitted to the hospital with aspiration: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Anthony D. Bai MD, MSc,&nbsp;Siddhartha Srivastava MD, MSc,&nbsp;Marie Leung MD,&nbsp;Heather Johnson MD,&nbsp;Amol A. Verma MD, MPhil,&nbsp;Fahad Razak MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to describe the association between insertion of a new long-term enteral feeding tube during admission for aspiration and in-hospital mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study across 28 Canadian hospitals from 2015 to 2022 included consecutive patients who were admitted for aspiration. Patients were categorized based on new long-term enteral feeding tube insertion during hospital stay or not. The primary outcome was the time to death in hospital. Secondary outcomes included time to discharge alive and hospital readmission for aspiration within 90 days. We used propensity score weighting to balance covariates, and a competing risk model to describe in-hospital death and discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 12,850 patients admitted for aspiration, 852 (6.6%) patients received a long-term enteral feeding tube. In the hospital, 184 (21.6%) and 2489 (20.8%) patients in the enteral feeding tube group and no enteral feeding tube group died, respectively. Within 90 days of discharge, 127 (14.9%) and 1148 (9.6%) patients in the enteral feeding tube and no enteral feeding tube group were readmitted for aspiration, respectively. After balancing covariates, an enteral feeding tube was associated with a similar in-hospital mortality risk (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.89–1.23; <i>P</i> = 0.5800), longer time to discharge alive (sHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.54–0.63; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and a higher risk of readmission (risk difference = 5.0%, 95% CI = 2.4%–7.6%; <i>P</i> = 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Initiation of long-term enteral tube feeding was not uncommon after admission for aspiration and was not associated with an improvement in the probability of being discharged alive from the hospital or readmitted for aspiration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":"48 7","pages":"841-849"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2680","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We aimed to describe the association between insertion of a new long-term enteral feeding tube during admission for aspiration and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study across 28 Canadian hospitals from 2015 to 2022 included consecutive patients who were admitted for aspiration. Patients were categorized based on new long-term enteral feeding tube insertion during hospital stay or not. The primary outcome was the time to death in hospital. Secondary outcomes included time to discharge alive and hospital readmission for aspiration within 90 days. We used propensity score weighting to balance covariates, and a competing risk model to describe in-hospital death and discharge.

Results

Of 12,850 patients admitted for aspiration, 852 (6.6%) patients received a long-term enteral feeding tube. In the hospital, 184 (21.6%) and 2489 (20.8%) patients in the enteral feeding tube group and no enteral feeding tube group died, respectively. Within 90 days of discharge, 127 (14.9%) and 1148 (9.6%) patients in the enteral feeding tube and no enteral feeding tube group were readmitted for aspiration, respectively. After balancing covariates, an enteral feeding tube was associated with a similar in-hospital mortality risk (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.89–1.23; P = 0.5800), longer time to discharge alive (sHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.54–0.63; P < 0.0001), and a higher risk of readmission (risk difference = 5.0%, 95% CI = 2.4%–7.6%; P = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Initiation of long-term enteral tube feeding was not uncommon after admission for aspiration and was not associated with an improvement in the probability of being discharged alive from the hospital or readmitted for aspiration.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新插入长期肠内喂食管与因吸入而入院的成人死亡率之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景我们旨在描述因吸痰入院期间插入新的长期肠内喂养管与院内死亡率之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究从 2015 年至 2022 年在加拿大 28 家医院进行,纳入了因吸入而入院的连续患者。根据住院期间是否新插入长期肠内喂养管对患者进行分类。主要结果为住院期间死亡时间。次要结果包括出院时存活时间和 90 天内因吸入而再次入院的时间。我们使用倾向评分加权法平衡协变量,并使用竞争风险模型描述院内死亡和出院情况:在因吸入而入院的12850名患者中,852名(6.6%)患者接受了长期肠内喂养管。在住院期间,肠内喂食管组和无肠内喂食管组分别有 184 名(21.6%)和 2489 名(20.8%)患者死亡。出院后 90 天内,肠内喂养管组和无肠内喂养管组分别有 127 名(14.9%)和 1148 名(9.6%)患者因误吸再次入院。在平衡协变量后,肠内喂养管与相似的院内死亡风险(亚分布危险比 [sHR] = 1.05,95% CI = 0.89-1.23;P = 0.5800)、更长的出院存活时间(sHR = 0.58,95% CI = 0.54-0.63;P 结论:肠内喂养管对患者的死亡风险和出院存活时间具有相关性:因吸痰入院后开始长期肠管喂养的情况并不少见,但这与提高出院后存活的概率或因吸痰再次入院的概率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information JPEN Reviewer Acknowledgment Association between enteral carboxymethyllysine intake and daily glycemic variability in critically ill adults: A retrospective cohort study. Comparison of taurolidine with 4% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on antimicrobial lock effectiveness: An experimental study. Association between oral feeding versus enteral feeding and cerumen impaction in older hospitalized adults: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1