Breaking challenges: queer perspectives on solutions to establish inclusive sexual-reproductive healthcare in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1406265
Raikane James Seretlo, Mathildah Mpata Mokgatle, Hanlie Smuts
{"title":"Breaking challenges: queer perspectives on solutions to establish inclusive sexual-reproductive healthcare in Gauteng Province, South Africa.","authors":"Raikane James Seretlo, Mathildah Mpata Mokgatle, Hanlie Smuts","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1406265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In South Africa's diverse population, queer voices emerge as change agents, proposing new and critical solutions to reform sexual and reproductive healthcare services in the pursuit of inclusivity and equality. Our research aimed to explore and describe queer individuals' perceptions and solutions for promoting sexual-reproductive healthcare services and needs (SRHSN) in Gauteng Province, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>An explorative-descriptive study was performed for this research. A total of 22 queer individuals was recruited using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) within a queer-inclusive non-governmental organization (NGO) clinic in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Semi-structured interviews and an interview guide were utilized to collect data using English. Thematic content analysis was applied using NVivo 14.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes and related sub-themes were revealed from the study including the creation of healthcare equity for queer individuals, empowering and supporting healthcare providers (HCPs) to enhance skills, knowledge, and expertise, raising awareness on queer-related issues, and different stakeholders' involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As we navigate South Africa's complex landscape of SRHSN for queer individuals, the crucial opinions and solutions offered by queer people not only challenge the status quo but also reveal an approach to a better, more equitable, empathetic, and accommodating healthcare system for everyone. Future studies should ensure the inclusiveness of queer individuals with the interest of improving their health not just for research outputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1406265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In South Africa's diverse population, queer voices emerge as change agents, proposing new and critical solutions to reform sexual and reproductive healthcare services in the pursuit of inclusivity and equality. Our research aimed to explore and describe queer individuals' perceptions and solutions for promoting sexual-reproductive healthcare services and needs (SRHSN) in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

Methodology: An explorative-descriptive study was performed for this research. A total of 22 queer individuals was recruited using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) within a queer-inclusive non-governmental organization (NGO) clinic in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Semi-structured interviews and an interview guide were utilized to collect data using English. Thematic content analysis was applied using NVivo 14.

Results: Four main themes and related sub-themes were revealed from the study including the creation of healthcare equity for queer individuals, empowering and supporting healthcare providers (HCPs) to enhance skills, knowledge, and expertise, raising awareness on queer-related issues, and different stakeholders' involvement.

Conclusion: As we navigate South Africa's complex landscape of SRHSN for queer individuals, the crucial opinions and solutions offered by queer people not only challenge the status quo but also reveal an approach to a better, more equitable, empathetic, and accommodating healthcare system for everyone. Future studies should ensure the inclusiveness of queer individuals with the interest of improving their health not just for research outputs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破挑战:从同性恋角度探讨在南非豪登省建立包容性的性生殖保健的解决方案。
导言:在南非多样化的人口中,同性恋者作为变革的推动者,为改革性健康和生殖健康服务提出了新的重要解决方案,以追求包容性和平等。我们的研究旨在探索和描述同性恋者对促进南非豪登省性健康和生殖健康服务及需求(SRHSN)的看法和解决方案:本研究进行了一项探索性描述研究。在南非豪登省一家由同性恋者组成的非政府组织(NGO)诊所内,采用受访者驱动抽样法(RDS)共招募了 22 名同性恋者。采用半结构式访谈和访谈指南,使用英语收集数据。使用 NVivo 14 进行了主题内容分析:研究揭示了四个主要主题和相关次主题,包括为同性恋者创造公平的医疗保健;增强医疗保健提供者(HCPs)的能力并为其提供支持,以提高其技能、知识和专业技能;提高对同性恋相关问题的认识;以及不同利益相关者的参与:在我们探索南非针对同性恋者的 SRHSN 的复杂情况时,同性恋者提出的重要意见和解决 方案不仅对现状提出了挑战,还揭示了一种为所有人提供更好、更公平、更具同理心和容 纳性的医疗保健系统的方法。未来的研究应确保同性恋者的包容性,以改善他们的健康状况,而不仅仅是为了研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating policies and regulations used to control corruption among accounting officers in the public sector of South Africa: a systematic literature review. Who is the next leader? Understanding women leadership development and succession planning in Saudi Arabian higher educational institutions. Communicating international politics narratives of security, democracy and human rights in contemporary society: indexing and analysis using online monitoring data. On the brink of social resistance: local community perceptions of mining company operating permits in East Luwu, Indonesia. COVID-19, social media, algorithms and the rise of indigenous movements in Southern Africa: perspectives from activists, audiences and policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1