Integrated care systems in England: the significance of collaborative community assets in promoting and sustaining health and wellbeing.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1355215
Oonagh Corrigan, Scott Danielsen, Shannon Doherty, Pauline Lane
{"title":"Integrated care systems in England: the significance of collaborative community assets in promoting and sustaining health and wellbeing.","authors":"Oonagh Corrigan, Scott Danielsen, Shannon Doherty, Pauline Lane","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1355215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until recently the healthcare system in England was based on a commissioning/provider model. However, this has been replaced with an Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) approach, aimed at improving health and wellbeing and reducing inequalities through local collaborative partnerships with public sector organizations, community groups, social enterprise organizations and other local agencies. Part of this new approach is an emphasis on the role of community assets (i.e., local resources), that are considered integral to promoting positive health and wellbeing outcomes. This paper presents research from a series of three research studies on \"community assets\" conducted in the East of England within a newly established ICS. Based on analysis of qualitative data highlighting the lived experience of community asset members, this paper shows the positive wellbeing impact on vulnerable community members that assets provide. Further insight on the local impact and the collaborative nature of the research is provided suggesting that new asset-based approaches recognize the social determinants of health. This presents a shift away from positivistic linear approaches to population health and wellbeing to a new non-linear collaborative approach to addressing health inequalities and promoting wellbeing. The authors suggest that exploring this through a complexity theory lens could illuminate this further. Finally, the authors warn that while community assets have an important role to play in empowering citizens and providing much needed support to vulnerable and disadvantaged communities, they are not a substitute for functioning funded public sector services that are currently being undermined by ongoing local governments funding cuts. As such, while community assets can help ameliorate some of the negative effects people experience due to economic, structural and health disadvantages, only a more fair and more equal distribution of resources can address growing health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1355215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Until recently the healthcare system in England was based on a commissioning/provider model. However, this has been replaced with an Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) approach, aimed at improving health and wellbeing and reducing inequalities through local collaborative partnerships with public sector organizations, community groups, social enterprise organizations and other local agencies. Part of this new approach is an emphasis on the role of community assets (i.e., local resources), that are considered integral to promoting positive health and wellbeing outcomes. This paper presents research from a series of three research studies on "community assets" conducted in the East of England within a newly established ICS. Based on analysis of qualitative data highlighting the lived experience of community asset members, this paper shows the positive wellbeing impact on vulnerable community members that assets provide. Further insight on the local impact and the collaborative nature of the research is provided suggesting that new asset-based approaches recognize the social determinants of health. This presents a shift away from positivistic linear approaches to population health and wellbeing to a new non-linear collaborative approach to addressing health inequalities and promoting wellbeing. The authors suggest that exploring this through a complexity theory lens could illuminate this further. Finally, the authors warn that while community assets have an important role to play in empowering citizens and providing much needed support to vulnerable and disadvantaged communities, they are not a substitute for functioning funded public sector services that are currently being undermined by ongoing local governments funding cuts. As such, while community assets can help ameliorate some of the negative effects people experience due to economic, structural and health disadvantages, only a more fair and more equal distribution of resources can address growing health inequalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英格兰的综合护理系统:合作性社区资产在促进和维持健康与福祉方面的重要性。
直到最近,英格兰的医疗保健系统仍以委托/提供模式为基础。然而,这种模式已被 "综合护理系统"(ICSs)方法所取代,其目的是通过与公共部门组织、社区团体、社会企业组织和其他地方机构建立地方合作伙伴关系,改善健康和福祉,减少不平等现象。这种新方法的一部分是强调社区资产(即当地资源)的作用,这些资产被认为是促进积极的健康和幸福结果不可或缺的一部分。本文介绍了在英格兰东部新成立的综合服务社内开展的三项关于 "社区资产 "的系列研究。本文基于对定性数据的分析,强调了社区资产成员的生活经验,显示了社区资产对弱势社区成员的积极福祉影响。本文对研究的地方影响和合作性质提出了进一步的见解,表明以资产为基础的新方法认识到了健康的社会决定因素。这表明,在人口健康和福祉方面,已从实证主义的线性方法转变为一种新的非线性合作方法,以解决健康不平等问题并促进福祉。作者认为,从复杂性理论的角度来探讨这一问题可以进一步阐明这一点。最后,作者警告说,虽然社区资产在增强公民能力以及为弱势和处境不利社区提供急需的支持方面发挥着重要作用,但它们并不能替代目前因地方政府持续削减资金而受到损害的、由公共部门资助的正常运作服务。因此,虽然社区资产可以帮助改善人们因经济、结构和健康方面的不利因素而遭受的一些负面影响,但只有更加公平和平等地分配资源,才能解决日益加剧的健康不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating policies and regulations used to control corruption among accounting officers in the public sector of South Africa: a systematic literature review. Who is the next leader? Understanding women leadership development and succession planning in Saudi Arabian higher educational institutions. Communicating international politics narratives of security, democracy and human rights in contemporary society: indexing and analysis using online monitoring data. On the brink of social resistance: local community perceptions of mining company operating permits in East Luwu, Indonesia. COVID-19, social media, algorithms and the rise of indigenous movements in Southern Africa: perspectives from activists, audiences and policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1