Assessing the efficacy of the shock index in predicting mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2024.67434
Aysenur Onalan, Bengu Mutlu Saricicek
{"title":"Assessing the efficacy of the shock index in predicting mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.","authors":"Aysenur Onalan, Bengu Mutlu Saricicek","doi":"10.14744/nci.2024.67434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It has been reported that the shock index assists in the prediction of poor prognosis in stroke patients. However, the role of this index in predicting mortality and prognosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage has not been sufficiently investigated. The objective is to examine the correlation between the shock index and mortality and unfavorable clinical outcomes in individuals with intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>110 consecutive cases of intracerebral hemorrhage were evaluated in the emergency department. The shock index values of the patients were calculated using their initial blood pressures and HR. For descriptive purposes, the shock index values were categorized into three groups: <0.50, 0.50-0.70, and >0.70. The relationships of these three values and the mean shock index with hematoma volume, hematoma rupturing into the ventricle, length of hospital stay, complications during this period, and in-hospital and three-month mortality were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 58 male patients in this study, with a mean age of 62.66±13.64 years. The mean baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score was 13.78±2.37, and the mean baseline shock index value was 0.51±0.13. The mean time of hospitalization was estimated to be 17.01±14.02 days. The mean in-hospital mortality rate was 19%, and the mean three-month mortality rate was 23%. No statistically significant differences were found in hematoma volume, hematoma rupturing into the ventricle, length of hospital stay, complications during this period, or in-hospital and three-month mortality according to the mean shock index value or shock index categories (<0.50, 0.50-0.70, and >0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The shock index evaluated in the emergency department in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage is not related to mortality or morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"11 4","pages":"353-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2024.67434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It has been reported that the shock index assists in the prediction of poor prognosis in stroke patients. However, the role of this index in predicting mortality and prognosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage has not been sufficiently investigated. The objective is to examine the correlation between the shock index and mortality and unfavorable clinical outcomes in individuals with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Methods: 110 consecutive cases of intracerebral hemorrhage were evaluated in the emergency department. The shock index values of the patients were calculated using their initial blood pressures and HR. For descriptive purposes, the shock index values were categorized into three groups: <0.50, 0.50-0.70, and >0.70. The relationships of these three values and the mean shock index with hematoma volume, hematoma rupturing into the ventricle, length of hospital stay, complications during this period, and in-hospital and three-month mortality were examined.

Results: There were 58 male patients in this study, with a mean age of 62.66±13.64 years. The mean baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score was 13.78±2.37, and the mean baseline shock index value was 0.51±0.13. The mean time of hospitalization was estimated to be 17.01±14.02 days. The mean in-hospital mortality rate was 19%, and the mean three-month mortality rate was 23%. No statistically significant differences were found in hematoma volume, hematoma rupturing into the ventricle, length of hospital stay, complications during this period, or in-hospital and three-month mortality according to the mean shock index value or shock index categories (<0.50, 0.50-0.70, and >0.70).

Conclusion: The shock index evaluated in the emergency department in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage is not related to mortality or morbidity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估休克指数在预测脑出血患者死亡率方面的功效。
目的:据报道,休克指数有助于预测脑卒中患者的不良预后。然而,该指数在预测脑出血患者死亡率和预后方面的作用尚未得到充分研究。目的是研究休克指数与脑出血患者死亡率和不良临床预后之间的相关性。根据患者的初始血压和心率计算其休克指数值。为便于描述,将休克指数值分为三组:0.70、0.70、0.70。研究了这三个值和平均休克指数与血肿体积、血肿破裂进入心室、住院时间、住院期间并发症以及住院和三个月死亡率之间的关系:58例男性患者,平均年龄(62.66±13.64)岁。格拉斯哥昏迷量表基线平均评分为(13.78±2.37)分,休克指数基线平均值为(0.51±0.13)分。平均住院时间为(17.01±14.02)天。平均住院死亡率为 19%,平均三个月死亡率为 23%。根据休克指数平均值或休克指数类别(0.70),在血肿量、血肿破裂进入心室、住院时间、住院期间并发症、院内死亡率和三个月死亡率方面均无统计学差异:结论:急诊科对脑出血患者休克指数的评估与死亡率或发病率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can HALP (Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet) score distinguish malignant and benign causes of extrahepatic cholestasis in patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction? Do we know about dynapenia? Systematic review of survey/questionnaire-based drug utilization studies in Turkiye. Investigation of the presence of Epstein-Barr virus in patients who had Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Contact Lesions with Real-time PCR method in serum, tissue, and saliva samples. Vena cava and renal vein thrombosis with pheochromocytoma: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1