Interactive effects of Ag nanoparticles/nitrate and plant root systems on quality indicators and aggregate stability of two texturally-different soils

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2024.106257
Elham Entezami , Mohammad Reza Mosaddeghi , Mehran Shirvani , Banafshe Khalili , Mehdi Bazarganipour
{"title":"Interactive effects of Ag nanoparticles/nitrate and plant root systems on quality indicators and aggregate stability of two texturally-different soils","authors":"Elham Entezami ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Mosaddeghi ,&nbsp;Mehran Shirvani ,&nbsp;Banafshe Khalili ,&nbsp;Mehdi Bazarganipour","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Widespread sources of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) might threaten soil ecosystems. Most studies on NPs have been carried out in plant-free soils, which do not represent natural conditions. Monitoring the fate and possible effects of nanoparticles (NPs) in soil-plant systems is crucial for predicting their environmental consequences. Plant root systems might respond differently to Ag types/concentrations, associated with changes in microbially-induced soil structural stability as well as soil C pools but evidence is not available. Therefore, a greenhouse experiment was conducted in a factorial arrangement of treatments within a randomized block design. The treatments included: 1) soil types (loamy sand and sandy loam), 2) root systems (non-planted, wheat with fibrous roots and safflower with taproot), 3) Ag types (no-Ag added, AgNPs of mean size 38.6 nm, and AgNO<sub>3</sub>), and 4) Ag concentrations (50 and 100 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> soil). Soil samples were collected from root zone and non-planted soil 110 days after sowing. Soil quality indicators including high energy moisture characteristic (HEMC) indicators, percent of water-stable aggregates (WSA), water-dispersible clay (DC), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and metabolic quotient (<em>q</em><sub>CO2</sub>) were determined. The results showed that the soil structure was improved in the presence of Ag and plants. Structural stability indicators were greater in the safflower root zone followed by the wheat root zone and the non-planted soil. A clear effect of Ag on HEMC was observed in the 100 mg AgNPs kg<sup>–1</sup> treatment. The stability ratio (SR, ratio of fast-wetting to slow-wetting structural indexes) of the AgNPs-treated soils (SR = 0.79) was significantly greater than that of the AgNO<sub>3</sub>-treated soils (SR = 0.78) followed by the control (no-Ag) soils (SR = 0.74). In the AgNO<sub>3</sub>-treated soils, the SIR was significantly lower than in the AgNPs-treated soils. The SIR of the 50 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> Ag treatment (232 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C kg<sup>–1</sup>) was higher than the 100 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> (227 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C kg<sup>–1</sup>). Microbial biomass was significantly affected by Ag types/concentrations and all Ag-treated soils exhibited significantly lower MBC than control. The <em>q</em><sub>CO2</sub>, the index of stress to microbial community, was significantly greater in the Ag-treated soils. Scanning electron microscope images confirmed that AgNPs altered the arrangement of particles which was greater in the higher AgNPs concentration. These results imply that multiple factors (root systems, soil texture, Ag type/concentration) may combine additively/regressively to affect soil quality indicators, which may have important consequences for soil ecosystem services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 106257"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Widespread sources of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) might threaten soil ecosystems. Most studies on NPs have been carried out in plant-free soils, which do not represent natural conditions. Monitoring the fate and possible effects of nanoparticles (NPs) in soil-plant systems is crucial for predicting their environmental consequences. Plant root systems might respond differently to Ag types/concentrations, associated with changes in microbially-induced soil structural stability as well as soil C pools but evidence is not available. Therefore, a greenhouse experiment was conducted in a factorial arrangement of treatments within a randomized block design. The treatments included: 1) soil types (loamy sand and sandy loam), 2) root systems (non-planted, wheat with fibrous roots and safflower with taproot), 3) Ag types (no-Ag added, AgNPs of mean size 38.6 nm, and AgNO3), and 4) Ag concentrations (50 and 100 mg kg–1 soil). Soil samples were collected from root zone and non-planted soil 110 days after sowing. Soil quality indicators including high energy moisture characteristic (HEMC) indicators, percent of water-stable aggregates (WSA), water-dispersible clay (DC), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and metabolic quotient (qCO2) were determined. The results showed that the soil structure was improved in the presence of Ag and plants. Structural stability indicators were greater in the safflower root zone followed by the wheat root zone and the non-planted soil. A clear effect of Ag on HEMC was observed in the 100 mg AgNPs kg–1 treatment. The stability ratio (SR, ratio of fast-wetting to slow-wetting structural indexes) of the AgNPs-treated soils (SR = 0.79) was significantly greater than that of the AgNO3-treated soils (SR = 0.78) followed by the control (no-Ag) soils (SR = 0.74). In the AgNO3-treated soils, the SIR was significantly lower than in the AgNPs-treated soils. The SIR of the 50 mg kg–1 Ag treatment (232 mg CO2-C kg–1) was higher than the 100 mg kg–1 (227 mg CO2-C kg–1). Microbial biomass was significantly affected by Ag types/concentrations and all Ag-treated soils exhibited significantly lower MBC than control. The qCO2, the index of stress to microbial community, was significantly greater in the Ag-treated soils. Scanning electron microscope images confirmed that AgNPs altered the arrangement of particles which was greater in the higher AgNPs concentration. These results imply that multiple factors (root systems, soil texture, Ag type/concentration) may combine additively/regressively to affect soil quality indicators, which may have important consequences for soil ecosystem services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳米银/硝酸盐和植物根系对两种质地不同土壤的质量指标和聚合稳定性的交互影响
纳米银粒子(AgNPs)的广泛来源可能会威胁到土壤生态系统。大多数有关 NPs 的研究都是在不含植物的土壤中进行的,这并不代表自然条件。监测纳米粒子(NPs)在土壤-植物系统中的归宿和可能产生的影响对于预测其环境后果至关重要。植物根系可能会对Ag的类型/浓度做出不同的反应,这与微生物引起的土壤结构稳定性和土壤C库的变化有关,但目前还没有相关证据。因此,我们在随机区组设计中采用因子处理法进行了一项温室实验。处理包括1) 土壤类型(壤土和沙壤土);2) 根系(未种植、须根小麦和直根红花);3) Ag 类型(未添加 Ag、平均粒径为 38.6 nm 的 AgNPs 和 AgNO3);4) Ag 浓度(50 和 100 mg kg-1 土壤)。土壤样本采集自播种后 110 天的根区和非种植区土壤。土壤质量指标包括高能水分特征(HEMC)指标、水稳团聚体(WSA)百分比、水分散粘土(DC)、基质诱导呼吸(SIR)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)和代谢商(qCO2)。结果表明,有农业和植物存在时,土壤结构得到改善。红花根区的结构稳定性指标更高,其次是小麦根区和未种植土壤。在 100 毫克 AgNPs kg-1 处理中,观察到了 Ag 对 HEMC 的明显影响。AgNPs 处理过的土壤的稳定性比率(SR,快湿与慢湿结构指数之比)(SR = 0.79)明显高于 AgNO3 处理过的土壤(SR = 0.78),其次是对照组(无银)土壤(SR = 0.74)。在 AgNO3 处理过的土壤中,SIR 明显低于 AgNPs 处理过的土壤。50 mg kg-1 Ag 处理(232 mg CO2-C kg-1)的 SIR 高于 100 mg kg-1 处理(227 mg CO2-C kg-1)。微生物生物量受到 Ag 类型/浓度的显著影响,所有 Ag 处理过的土壤的 MBC 都显著低于对照组。在 Ag 处理过的土壤中,微生物群落的压力指数 qCO2 明显增加。扫描电子显微镜图像证实,AgNPs 改变了颗粒的排列,AgNPs 浓度越高,这种改变越明显。这些结果表明,多种因素(根系、土壤质地、Ag 类型/浓度)可能叠加/递增地影响土壤质量指标,从而对土壤生态系统服务产生重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Structure and water infiltration in an Ultisol affected by cover crops and seasonality Novel approaches for alleviating shallow soil compaction using microbial fertilizers and their beneficial impacts on plant growth and soil physicochemical properties Fertilization and rotation enhance tobacco yield by regulating soil physicochemical and microbial properties Configuration of pore structure and related functions in macroaggregates following long-term organic and inorganic fertilization A field study integrating plant physiology-soil response for quantifying wilting and plant survival time in a polymer-amended soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1