William Lamb , Andrew Mott , Robert Popp , Greg Chmiel
{"title":"Estimating values of Fe3+/ΣFe in pyroxenes with the electron microprobe","authors":"William Lamb , Andrew Mott , Robert Popp , Greg Chmiel","doi":"10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ ΣFe (ΣFe = Fe<sup>3+</sup> + Fe<sup>2+</sup>) were determined for six (6) pyroxenes, (five (5) diopsides and one (1) enstatite), using the single dissolution technique of <span><span>Fritz and Popp, 1985</span></span> (FP85). These same pyroxenes were analyzed with the electron microprobe (EMP), and values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ΣFe were determined using charge balance from average EMP compositions. Typically, these averages were based on thirty (30) analyses on multiple grains of the same sample, although some pyroxenes were characterized with as few as 9 and as many as 120 analyses.</p><p>Differences between average values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ΣFe determined using the two methods were ≤ 0.02 for pyroxenes with Fe-contents >9 wt% FeO<sub>T</sub> (all Fe as FeO<sub>T</sub>). Pyroxenes with lower Fe contents of approximately 4 to 6 wt% FeO<sub>T</sub> exhibit differences that fall between 0.02 and 0.06. One pyroxene, with the lowest Fe-content (1.79 wt% FeO<sub>T</sub>; 0.055 atoms per formula unit or apfu), exhibits the largest difference Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ ΣFe difference between EMP and FP85 of 0.14. Values of the standard deviation (1σ), based on average values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ ΣFe (EMP), range from 0.03 to 0.22, which are also inversely correlated to the Fe content. For pyroxenes with FeO<sub>T</sub> > 4.0 wt%, and with compositions similar to those examined in this study, it is possible to use charge balance to determine values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ΣFe(EMP) to better than ±0.07.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18070,"journal":{"name":"Lithos","volume":"484 ","pages":"Article 107746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithos","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493724002597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Values of Fe3+/ ΣFe (ΣFe = Fe3+ + Fe2+) were determined for six (6) pyroxenes, (five (5) diopsides and one (1) enstatite), using the single dissolution technique of Fritz and Popp, 1985 (FP85). These same pyroxenes were analyzed with the electron microprobe (EMP), and values of Fe3+/ΣFe were determined using charge balance from average EMP compositions. Typically, these averages were based on thirty (30) analyses on multiple grains of the same sample, although some pyroxenes were characterized with as few as 9 and as many as 120 analyses.
Differences between average values of Fe3+/ΣFe determined using the two methods were ≤ 0.02 for pyroxenes with Fe-contents >9 wt% FeOT (all Fe as FeOT). Pyroxenes with lower Fe contents of approximately 4 to 6 wt% FeOT exhibit differences that fall between 0.02 and 0.06. One pyroxene, with the lowest Fe-content (1.79 wt% FeOT; 0.055 atoms per formula unit or apfu), exhibits the largest difference Fe3+/ ΣFe difference between EMP and FP85 of 0.14. Values of the standard deviation (1σ), based on average values of Fe3+/ ΣFe (EMP), range from 0.03 to 0.22, which are also inversely correlated to the Fe content. For pyroxenes with FeOT > 4.0 wt%, and with compositions similar to those examined in this study, it is possible to use charge balance to determine values of Fe3+/ΣFe(EMP) to better than ±0.07.
期刊介绍:
Lithos publishes original research papers on the petrology, geochemistry and petrogenesis of igneous and metamorphic rocks. Papers on mineralogy/mineral physics related to petrology and petrogenetic problems are also welcomed.