Estimating values of Fe3+/ΣFe in pyroxenes with the electron microprobe

IF 2.9 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Lithos Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107746
William Lamb , Andrew Mott , Robert Popp , Greg Chmiel
{"title":"Estimating values of Fe3+/ΣFe in pyroxenes with the electron microprobe","authors":"William Lamb ,&nbsp;Andrew Mott ,&nbsp;Robert Popp ,&nbsp;Greg Chmiel","doi":"10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ ΣFe (ΣFe = Fe<sup>3+</sup> + Fe<sup>2+</sup>) were determined for six (6) pyroxenes, (five (5) diopsides and one (1) enstatite), using the single dissolution technique of <span><span>Fritz and Popp, 1985</span></span> (FP85). These same pyroxenes were analyzed with the electron microprobe (EMP), and values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ΣFe were determined using charge balance from average EMP compositions. Typically, these averages were based on thirty (30) analyses on multiple grains of the same sample, although some pyroxenes were characterized with as few as 9 and as many as 120 analyses.</p><p>Differences between average values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ΣFe determined using the two methods were ≤ 0.02 for pyroxenes with Fe-contents &gt;9 wt% FeO<sub>T</sub> (all Fe as FeO<sub>T</sub>). Pyroxenes with lower Fe contents of approximately 4 to 6 wt% FeO<sub>T</sub> exhibit differences that fall between 0.02 and 0.06. One pyroxene, with the lowest Fe-content (1.79 wt% FeO<sub>T</sub>; 0.055 atoms per formula unit or apfu), exhibits the largest difference Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ ΣFe difference between EMP and FP85 of 0.14. Values of the standard deviation (1σ), based on average values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ ΣFe (EMP), range from 0.03 to 0.22, which are also inversely correlated to the Fe content. For pyroxenes with FeO<sub>T</sub> &gt; 4.0 wt%, and with compositions similar to those examined in this study, it is possible to use charge balance to determine values of Fe<sup>3+</sup>/ΣFe(EMP) to better than ±0.07.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18070,"journal":{"name":"Lithos","volume":"484 ","pages":"Article 107746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithos","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493724002597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Values of Fe3+/ ΣFe (ΣFe = Fe3+ + Fe2+) were determined for six (6) pyroxenes, (five (5) diopsides and one (1) enstatite), using the single dissolution technique of Fritz and Popp, 1985 (FP85). These same pyroxenes were analyzed with the electron microprobe (EMP), and values of Fe3+/ΣFe were determined using charge balance from average EMP compositions. Typically, these averages were based on thirty (30) analyses on multiple grains of the same sample, although some pyroxenes were characterized with as few as 9 and as many as 120 analyses.

Differences between average values of Fe3+/ΣFe determined using the two methods were ≤ 0.02 for pyroxenes with Fe-contents >9 wt% FeOT (all Fe as FeOT). Pyroxenes with lower Fe contents of approximately 4 to 6 wt% FeOT exhibit differences that fall between 0.02 and 0.06. One pyroxene, with the lowest Fe-content (1.79 wt% FeOT; 0.055 atoms per formula unit or apfu), exhibits the largest difference Fe3+/ ΣFe difference between EMP and FP85 of 0.14. Values of the standard deviation (1σ), based on average values of Fe3+/ ΣFe (EMP), range from 0.03 to 0.22, which are also inversely correlated to the Fe content. For pyroxenes with FeOT > 4.0 wt%, and with compositions similar to those examined in this study, it is possible to use charge balance to determine values of Fe3+/ΣFe(EMP) to better than ±0.07.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用电子微探针估算辉石中的 Fe3+/ΣFe 值
采用 Fritz 和 Popp 1985 年提出的单溶解技术(FP85),测定了六(6)种辉石(五(5)种二长石和一(1)种辉石)的 Fe3+/ΣFe 值(ΣFe = Fe3+ + Fe2+)。使用电子显微镜(EMP)对这些辉石进行了分析,并根据 EMP 的平均成分使用电荷平衡法确定了 Fe3+/ΣFe 的值。通常情况下,这些平均值是基于对同一样品的多个晶粒进行的三十(30)次分析得出的,但有些辉石的分析次数少则 9 次,多则 120 次。铁含量较低的辉石(FeOT 含量约为 4 到 6 wt%)显示出 0.02 到 0.06 之间的差异。有一种铁含量最低的辉石(FeOT 含量为 1.79 wt%;每式单位或 apfu 含 0.055 个原子),其 EMP 与 FP85 之间的 Fe3+/ ΣFe 差值最大,达到 0.14。基于 Fe3+/ ΣFe(EMP)平均值的标准偏差(1σ)值在 0.03 至 0.22 之间,也与铁含量成反比。对于 FeOT > 4.0 wt% 的辉石,以及与本研究中的成分相似的辉石,可以使用电荷平衡来确定 Fe3+/ΣFe(EMP) 的值,其精度优于 ±0.07。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lithos
Lithos 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
286
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Lithos publishes original research papers on the petrology, geochemistry and petrogenesis of igneous and metamorphic rocks. Papers on mineralogy/mineral physics related to petrology and petrogenetic problems are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board East–west-trending tearing of the Indian slab beneath the eastern Tibetan Plateau: Insights from Eocene–Oligocene potassic adakite-like granites in western Yunnan Early Cretaceous to Eocene magmatic evolution of Livingston Island, South Shetland Archipelago: Geochronological and isotope geochemical constraints from intrusive suites Accessory minerals fingerprint post-collisional anatectic metamorphism in continental collision zones The behaviour of scandium during crustal anatexis: Implications for the petrogenesis of Sc-enriched granitic magma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1