The great equalizer? Mixed effects of social infrastructure on diverse encounters in cities

IF 7.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Computers Environment and Urban Systems Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102173
Timothy Fraser , Takahiro Yabe , Daniel P. Aldrich , Esteban Moro
{"title":"The great equalizer? Mixed effects of social infrastructure on diverse encounters in cities","authors":"Timothy Fraser ,&nbsp;Takahiro Yabe ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Aldrich ,&nbsp;Esteban Moro","doi":"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Casual encounters with diverse groups of people in urban spaces have been shown to foster social capital and trust, leading to higher quality of life, civic participation, and community resilience to hazards. To promote such diverse encounters and cultivate social ties, policymakers develop social infrastructure sites, such as community centers, parks, and plazas. However, their effects on the diversity of encounters, compared to baseline sites (e.g., grocery stores), have not been fully understood. In this study, we use a large-scale, privacy-enhanced mobility dataset of &gt;120 K anonymized mobile phone users in the Boston area to evaluate the effects of social infrastructure sites on the observed frequencies of inter-income and inter-race encounters. Contrary to our intuition that all social infrastructure sites promote diverse encounters, we find the effects to be mixed and more nuanced. Overall, parks and social businesses promote more inter-income encounters, while community spaces promote more same-income encounters, but each produces opposite effects for inter-race encounters. Parks and community spaces located in low-income neighborhoods were shown to result in higher inter-income and inter-race encounters compared to ordinary sites, respectively, however, their associations were insignificant in high-income areas. These empirical results suggest that the type of social infrastructure and neighborhood traits may alter levels of diverse encounters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48241,"journal":{"name":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102173"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971524001029/pdfft?md5=c786c4fc1d48da349c63a96784b87d71&pid=1-s2.0-S0198971524001029-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971524001029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Casual encounters with diverse groups of people in urban spaces have been shown to foster social capital and trust, leading to higher quality of life, civic participation, and community resilience to hazards. To promote such diverse encounters and cultivate social ties, policymakers develop social infrastructure sites, such as community centers, parks, and plazas. However, their effects on the diversity of encounters, compared to baseline sites (e.g., grocery stores), have not been fully understood. In this study, we use a large-scale, privacy-enhanced mobility dataset of >120 K anonymized mobile phone users in the Boston area to evaluate the effects of social infrastructure sites on the observed frequencies of inter-income and inter-race encounters. Contrary to our intuition that all social infrastructure sites promote diverse encounters, we find the effects to be mixed and more nuanced. Overall, parks and social businesses promote more inter-income encounters, while community spaces promote more same-income encounters, but each produces opposite effects for inter-race encounters. Parks and community spaces located in low-income neighborhoods were shown to result in higher inter-income and inter-race encounters compared to ordinary sites, respectively, however, their associations were insignificant in high-income areas. These empirical results suggest that the type of social infrastructure and neighborhood traits may alter levels of diverse encounters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伟大的均衡器?社会基础设施对城市不同遭遇的混合效应
事实证明,在城市空间中与不同人群的偶然相遇能促进社会资本和信任,从而提高生活质量、公民参与度和社区抵御危害的能力。为了促进这种多样化的相遇并培养社会联系,政策制定者开发了社会基础设施场所,如社区中心、公园和广场。然而,与基线场所(如杂货店)相比,这些场所对相遇多样性的影响尚未得到充分了解。在本研究中,我们利用波士顿地区 120 K 匿名手机用户的大规模、隐私增强型移动数据集,评估了社会基础设施对观察到的收入间和种族间相遇频率的影响。与我们认为所有的社会基础设施都会促进多样化相遇的直觉相反,我们发现这种影响是混合的,而且更加细微。总体而言,公园和社会企业促进了更多不同收入人群的相遇,而社区空间则促进了更多相同收入人群的相遇,但两者对不同种族人群的相遇产生了相反的影响。与普通地点相比,位于低收入社区的公园和社区空间分别能带来更多的收入间和种族间接触,但在高收入地区,它们的关联性并不显著。这些实证结果表明,社会基础设施的类型和邻里特征可能会改变不同相遇的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
111
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Computers, Environment and Urban Systemsis an interdisciplinary journal publishing cutting-edge and innovative computer-based research on environmental and urban systems, that privileges the geospatial perspective. The journal welcomes original high quality scholarship of a theoretical, applied or technological nature, and provides a stimulating presentation of perspectives, research developments, overviews of important new technologies and uses of major computational, information-based, and visualization innovations. Applied and theoretical contributions demonstrate the scope of computer-based analysis fostering a better understanding of environmental and urban systems, their spatial scope and their dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the density of urban trees in 1890s Leeds and Edinburgh using object detection on historical maps The role of data resolution in analyzing urban form and PM2.5 concentration Causal discovery and analysis of global city carbon emissions based on data-driven and hybrid intelligence Editorial Board Exploring the built environment impacts on Online Car-hailing waiting time: An empirical study in Beijing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1