Geological Evolution of the Karakoram Terrane since Neoproterozoic

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104890
Shailendra Pundir, Vikas Adlakha
{"title":"Geological Evolution of the Karakoram Terrane since Neoproterozoic","authors":"Shailendra Pundir,&nbsp;Vikas Adlakha","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Karakoram Terrane (KT) in the western margin of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen preserves the record of the Tethyan oceanic lithospheric subduction beneath the Asian Plate and metamorphism linked to the subduction of the Indian slab and the India-Asia collision. This terrane is also significant for understanding the changes in tectonics over time in the continent-continent collision zones related to mantle dynamics, slab underthrusting, or large-scale strike-slip faults. Despite a long geological research history over the past 140 years, this terrane's magmatic, petrogenetic, deformation, and uplift history remains enigmatic. This is mainly because of non-consensus over the distribution, source, and processes for the emplacement of variably occurring I-and S-type granitoids and changing tectonic processes through time. Thus, to resolve these issues, this paper reviews the KT's magmatic, deformation, and uplift history. Apart from its Neoproterozoic basement, two main stages of Andean-type magmatism have been identified in the KT. Stage 1 happened during ∼160-100 Ma, forming hornblende (Hbl)-biotite (Bt)-bearing and Bt-bearing granitoids. The field evidence, hybrid isotope signatures, and thermodynamic whole-rock major element modeling show that the formation of these granitoids involves assimilation with upper crustal rocks. The Stage 2 Hbl-Bt bearing Pangong Transpression Zone (PTZ) granitoids in the eastern KT were formed during ∼83-56 Ma; they show juvenile isotopic signatures and, thus, their origin from the mantle. The major element thermodynamic modeling of these granitoids suggests that these rocks were formed due to fractional crystallization. Our compilation and analysis of geochemical, isotopic, and geochemical modeling suggest that these granitoids belong to the Ladakh magmatic arc rather than the Karakoram Batholith granitoids of the KT, contrary to earlier beliefs. The origin of Eocene-Oligocene leucogranites of the KT remains controversial with the variable inferred processes of their origin, like water-flux melting of granitoids, dehydration melting of metapelites, and slab-breakoff, shearing or compression-induced partial melt generation. This study assesses these scenarios by compiling geochronological, geochemical, and isotopic data to understand the role of these processes in partial melt generation over spatial and temporal scales. Our assessment suggests that the monzogranites and hbl-bearing leucogranites are generated as a result of slab-breakoff and KF shearing-induced melting of the existing igneous sources, while the two-mica±grt leucogranites are sourced from the melting of supracrustal metapelitic rocks due to crustal thickening. This paper provides the compilation of cooling rates from all the published mid-to-low temperature thermochronometric ages to assess the different phases of the uplift of the KT on spatial and temporal scales. Our compilation suggests that the KT was uplifted mainly in three phases: (a) during the Early-Late Cretaceous as evidenced by pre-India-Asia collisional metamorphism and crustal thickening, (b) lithospheric-delamination driven uplift as a result of the slab breakoff of the subducting Indian lower crust during the Oligo-Miocene, and (c) in its final phase because of the underthrusting of the Indian Plate beneath the KT during the Pliocene. The interplay of tectonic uplift and glacial erosion carved the present-day topography of the KT into steeper hill slopes and relief with steeper river channel gradients since the Plio-Quaternary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 104890"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224002174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Karakoram Terrane (KT) in the western margin of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen preserves the record of the Tethyan oceanic lithospheric subduction beneath the Asian Plate and metamorphism linked to the subduction of the Indian slab and the India-Asia collision. This terrane is also significant for understanding the changes in tectonics over time in the continent-continent collision zones related to mantle dynamics, slab underthrusting, or large-scale strike-slip faults. Despite a long geological research history over the past 140 years, this terrane's magmatic, petrogenetic, deformation, and uplift history remains enigmatic. This is mainly because of non-consensus over the distribution, source, and processes for the emplacement of variably occurring I-and S-type granitoids and changing tectonic processes through time. Thus, to resolve these issues, this paper reviews the KT's magmatic, deformation, and uplift history. Apart from its Neoproterozoic basement, two main stages of Andean-type magmatism have been identified in the KT. Stage 1 happened during ∼160-100 Ma, forming hornblende (Hbl)-biotite (Bt)-bearing and Bt-bearing granitoids. The field evidence, hybrid isotope signatures, and thermodynamic whole-rock major element modeling show that the formation of these granitoids involves assimilation with upper crustal rocks. The Stage 2 Hbl-Bt bearing Pangong Transpression Zone (PTZ) granitoids in the eastern KT were formed during ∼83-56 Ma; they show juvenile isotopic signatures and, thus, their origin from the mantle. The major element thermodynamic modeling of these granitoids suggests that these rocks were formed due to fractional crystallization. Our compilation and analysis of geochemical, isotopic, and geochemical modeling suggest that these granitoids belong to the Ladakh magmatic arc rather than the Karakoram Batholith granitoids of the KT, contrary to earlier beliefs. The origin of Eocene-Oligocene leucogranites of the KT remains controversial with the variable inferred processes of their origin, like water-flux melting of granitoids, dehydration melting of metapelites, and slab-breakoff, shearing or compression-induced partial melt generation. This study assesses these scenarios by compiling geochronological, geochemical, and isotopic data to understand the role of these processes in partial melt generation over spatial and temporal scales. Our assessment suggests that the monzogranites and hbl-bearing leucogranites are generated as a result of slab-breakoff and KF shearing-induced melting of the existing igneous sources, while the two-mica±grt leucogranites are sourced from the melting of supracrustal metapelitic rocks due to crustal thickening. This paper provides the compilation of cooling rates from all the published mid-to-low temperature thermochronometric ages to assess the different phases of the uplift of the KT on spatial and temporal scales. Our compilation suggests that the KT was uplifted mainly in three phases: (a) during the Early-Late Cretaceous as evidenced by pre-India-Asia collisional metamorphism and crustal thickening, (b) lithospheric-delamination driven uplift as a result of the slab breakoff of the subducting Indian lower crust during the Oligo-Miocene, and (c) in its final phase because of the underthrusting of the Indian Plate beneath the KT during the Pliocene. The interplay of tectonic uplift and glacial erosion carved the present-day topography of the KT into steeper hill slopes and relief with steeper river channel gradients since the Plio-Quaternary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新新生代以来喀喇昆仑山脉的地质演变
位于喜马拉雅-西藏造山带西缘的喀喇昆仑山系(KT)保留了亚洲板块下的哲西大洋岩石圈俯冲以及与印度板块俯冲和印度-亚洲碰撞有关的变质作用的记录。这块陆相对于了解大陆-大陆碰撞带的构造随时间推移而发生的变化也具有重要意义,这些变化与地幔动力学、板块下推或大规模走向滑动断层有关。尽管在过去的 140 年中进行了长期的地质研究,但这一地层的岩浆、岩石成因、变形和隆升历史仍然令人费解。这主要是因为人们对不同时期出现的 I 型和 S 型花岗岩的分布、来源和形成过程以及构造过程的变化尚未达成共识。因此,为了解决这些问题,本文回顾了KT的岩浆、变形和隆升历史。除了其新新生代基底之外,KT 的安第斯型岩浆活动主要分为两个阶段。第一阶段发生在 160-100 Ma 之间,形成了含角闪石(Hbl)-生橄榄岩(Bt)和含 Bt 的花岗岩。野外证据、混合同位素特征和热力学全岩主要元素模型表明,这些花岗岩的形成涉及与上地壳岩石的同化。KT东部含Hbl-Bt的第二阶段庞公断裂带(PTZ)花岗岩形成于∼83-56Ma期间;它们显示出幼年同位素特征,因此其起源于地幔。这些花岗岩的主要元素热力学模型表明,这些岩石是由碎裂结晶形成的。我们对地球化学、同位素和地球化学模型的汇编和分析表明,这些花岗岩属于拉达克岩浆弧,而非喀喇昆仑山脉的喀喇昆仑山岩花岗岩,这与之前的观点相反。KT的始新世-更新世白榴石的成因仍存在争议,其成因的推断过程多种多样,如花岗岩的水流熔融、偏闪长岩的脱水熔融,以及板块断裂、剪切或压缩引起的部分熔体生成。本研究通过汇编地质年代、地球化学和同位素数据,对这些情况进行了评估,以了解这些过程在空间和时间尺度上对部分熔体生成所起的作用。我们的评估表明,单斜花岗岩和含hbl的白花岗岩是由于板块断裂和KF剪切引起的现有火成岩源的熔融而产生的,而双云母±grt白花岗岩的来源则是由于地壳增厚引起的上壳元古界岩石的熔融。本文汇编了所有已发表的中低温测温年龄的冷却率,以评估 KT 在空间和时间尺度上隆升的不同阶段。我们的汇编表明,KT 的隆起主要分为三个阶段:(a) 早-晚白垩世,证据是前印度-亚洲碰撞变质作用和地壳增厚;(b) 中新世,由于俯冲印度下地壳的板块断裂,岩石圈脱层驱动隆起;(c) 中新世,由于 KT 下方印度板块的下推作用,隆起进入最后阶段。构造抬升和冰川侵蚀的相互作用,使 KT 自第四纪以来形成了今天的地形,山坡和地貌更加陡峭,河道坡度也更加陡峭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Viscous compression of clay and peat Lithospheric weakspots, not hotspots: New England-Quebec and Shenandoah anorogenic magmatism in the context of global plate tectonics, intraplate stress and LIPs Magmatic faults: Challenges, progress, and possibilities The Yanshanian Movement in Western Liaoning, northeastern North China Craton Rainfall as a driver of post-wildfire flooding and debris flows: A review and synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1