Responses of Leaf Expansion, Plant Transpiration and Leaf Senescence of Different Soybean (Glycine max. (L.) Merr.) Genotypes to Soil Water Deficit

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1111/jac.12746
Lin Kang, Philippe Debaeke, Céline Schoving, Pierre Maury
{"title":"Responses of Leaf Expansion, Plant Transpiration and Leaf Senescence of Different Soybean (Glycine max. (L.) Merr.) Genotypes to Soil Water Deficit","authors":"Lin Kang,&nbsp;Philippe Debaeke,&nbsp;Céline Schoving,&nbsp;Pierre Maury","doi":"10.1111/jac.12746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The responses of eco-physiological processes such as leaf expansion, plant transpiration and senescence to soil water deficit have been reported to be genotype-dependent in different crops. To study such responses in soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>. (L.) Merr.), a 2-year (2017 and 2021) outdoor pot experiment was carried out on the Heliaphen automated phenotyping platform at INRAE in Toulouse (France). Six soybean cultivars (Sultana-MG 000, ES Pallador-MG I, Isidor-MG I, Santana-MG I/II, Blancas-MG II and Ecudor-MG II) belonging to four maturity groups (MG) commonly grown in Europe were subjected to progressive soil water deficit from the reproductive stage R1 for 17 and 23 days in 2017 and 2021, respectively. The fraction of transpirable soil water (FTSW) was used as an indicator of soil water deficit. Non-linear regression was used to calculate FTSWt, that is, the FTSW threshold for which the rate of the eco-physiological process in stressed plants starts to diverge from a reference value. According to FTSWt, the three eco-physiological processes showed significant differences in sensitivity to water deficit: leaf expansion exhibits the highest sensitivity and the widest range (FTSWt: 0.44–0.93), followed by plant transpiration (FTSWt: 0.17–0.56), with leaf senescence showing the narrowest range (FTSWt: 0.05–0.16). Among six cultivars, regarding leaf expansion, Cvs Santana (FTSWt = 0.48 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.44 in 2021), Blancas (FTSWt = 0.51 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.48 in 2021) and Ecudor (FTSWt = 0.46 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.52 in 2021) in late MGs (I/II to II) exhibited higher tolerance to soil drying. Conversely, the cv. Sultana in the earliest MG (000) showed the highest sensitivity (FTSWt = 0.91 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.93 in 2021) to water deficit. However, concerning the FTSWt values for plant transpiration (0.17–0.56 in 2017; 0.19–0.31 in 2021) and senescence (0.05–0.16 in 2017; 0.06–0.16 in 2021), their range did not demonstrate a correlated trend with the MG. In addition, a negative linear correlation was observed between values of FTSWt of normalised leaf expansion at the whole-plant level (NLE) and specific leaf area (SLA) measured on irrigated plants for both years. This suggests that genotypes with high values of SLA could be associated with higher tolerance of leaf expansion to soil water deficit. Such a non-destructive phenotyping method under outdoor conditions could bring new information to variety testing process and provide paths for integrating genotypic variability into crop growth models used for simulating soybean eco-physiological responses to water deficit across the plant, field and even regional scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"210 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jac.12746","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.12746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The responses of eco-physiological processes such as leaf expansion, plant transpiration and senescence to soil water deficit have been reported to be genotype-dependent in different crops. To study such responses in soybean (Glycine max. (L.) Merr.), a 2-year (2017 and 2021) outdoor pot experiment was carried out on the Heliaphen automated phenotyping platform at INRAE in Toulouse (France). Six soybean cultivars (Sultana-MG 000, ES Pallador-MG I, Isidor-MG I, Santana-MG I/II, Blancas-MG II and Ecudor-MG II) belonging to four maturity groups (MG) commonly grown in Europe were subjected to progressive soil water deficit from the reproductive stage R1 for 17 and 23 days in 2017 and 2021, respectively. The fraction of transpirable soil water (FTSW) was used as an indicator of soil water deficit. Non-linear regression was used to calculate FTSWt, that is, the FTSW threshold for which the rate of the eco-physiological process in stressed plants starts to diverge from a reference value. According to FTSWt, the three eco-physiological processes showed significant differences in sensitivity to water deficit: leaf expansion exhibits the highest sensitivity and the widest range (FTSWt: 0.44–0.93), followed by plant transpiration (FTSWt: 0.17–0.56), with leaf senescence showing the narrowest range (FTSWt: 0.05–0.16). Among six cultivars, regarding leaf expansion, Cvs Santana (FTSWt = 0.48 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.44 in 2021), Blancas (FTSWt = 0.51 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.48 in 2021) and Ecudor (FTSWt = 0.46 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.52 in 2021) in late MGs (I/II to II) exhibited higher tolerance to soil drying. Conversely, the cv. Sultana in the earliest MG (000) showed the highest sensitivity (FTSWt = 0.91 in 2017; FTSWt = 0.93 in 2021) to water deficit. However, concerning the FTSWt values for plant transpiration (0.17–0.56 in 2017; 0.19–0.31 in 2021) and senescence (0.05–0.16 in 2017; 0.06–0.16 in 2021), their range did not demonstrate a correlated trend with the MG. In addition, a negative linear correlation was observed between values of FTSWt of normalised leaf expansion at the whole-plant level (NLE) and specific leaf area (SLA) measured on irrigated plants for both years. This suggests that genotypes with high values of SLA could be associated with higher tolerance of leaf expansion to soil water deficit. Such a non-destructive phenotyping method under outdoor conditions could bring new information to variety testing process and provide paths for integrating genotypic variability into crop growth models used for simulating soybean eco-physiological responses to water deficit across the plant, field and even regional scales.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同大豆(Glycine max.基因型对土壤缺水的响应
据报道,不同作物的生态生理过程(如叶片膨大、植物蒸腾和衰老)对土壤缺水的反应取决于基因型。为了研究大豆(Glycine max. (L.) Merr.)的这种反应,在法国图卢兹国家农业研究院(INRAE)的Heliaphen自动表型平台上进行了为期两年(2017年和2021年)的室外盆栽实验。2017 年和 2021 年,6 个大豆栽培品种(Sultana-MG 000、ES Pallador-MG I、Isidor-MG I、Santana-MG I/II、Blancas-MG II 和 Ecudor-MG II)属于欧洲常见的 4 个成熟度组(MG),从生殖期 R1 开始分别接受了 17 天和 23 天的渐进式土壤缺水。可渗透土壤水分(FTSW)被用作土壤缺水的指标。利用非线性回归计算 FTSWt,即受压植物生态生理过程的速率开始偏离参考值的 FTSW 临界值。根据 FTSWt,三种生态生理过程对水分亏缺的敏感度存在显著差异:叶片膨大的敏感度最高,范围最广(FTSWt:0.44-0.93),其次是植物蒸腾(FTSWt:0.17-0.56),叶片衰老的敏感度范围最窄(FTSWt:0.05-0.16)。在六个栽培品种中,关于叶片膨大,处于晚期 MGs(I/II 至 II)的桑塔纳(2017 年 FTSWt = 0.48;2021 年 FTSWt = 0.44)、布兰卡斯(2017 年 FTSWt = 0.51;2021 年 FTSWt = 0.48)和埃克多(2017 年 FTSWt = 0.46;2021 年 FTSWt = 0.52)对土壤干燥的耐受性较强。相反,在最早的 MGs(I/II 至 II)中,变种 Sultana 对土壤干旱的耐受性更高。相反,最早的 MG(000)中的 Sultana 品种对水分亏缺的敏感性最高(2017 年的 FTSWt = 0.91;2021 年的 FTSWt = 0.93)。然而,关于植物蒸腾(2017 年为 0.17-0.56;2021 年为 0.19-0.31)和衰老(2017 年为 0.05-0.16;2021 年为 0.06-0.16)的 FTSWt 值,其范围并未显示出与 MG 的相关趋势。此外,在这两年的灌溉植株上测量到的全株水平归一化叶片展开率(NLE)的 FTSWt 值与比叶面积(SLA)之间呈负线性相关。这表明,SLA 值高的基因型对土壤缺水的叶片膨大耐受性较高。这种室外条件下的非破坏性表型分析方法可为品种测试过程带来新的信息,并为将基因型变异性纳入作物生长模型提供了途径,该模型用于模拟大豆在植物、田间甚至区域范围内对水分亏缺的生态生理反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Drought Tolerance and Yield Stability of Sorghum Genotypes for Sustainable Agriculture in Sohag, Egypt Dry Spell Dynamics Impacting the Productivity of Rainfed Crops Over the Semi-Arid Regions of South-East India Effect of Shading on Leaf Anatomical Structure, Photosynthesis Characteristics and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Soybean (Glycine max) Comparative Analysis of Phytochemicals and Gene Expression in Soybean (Glycine max) Under Acute Moderated and Severe Elevated Ozone: Unravelling the Role of Antioxidant Defence Response of Durum Wheat Cultivars to Climate Change in a Mediterranean Environment: Trends of Weather and Crop Variables at the Turn of 21st Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1