Juliana M. Espíndola Lima, Yusa Ichinose, Impa Somayanda, William Schapaugh, Raju Dhandapani, Nazir Ahmad, Avat Shekoofa, Heng Ye, Christopher Turner, Gunvant Patil, Henry T. Nguyen, Glen Ritchie, S. V. Krishna Jagadish
Flower abortion in soybeans is a natural process that intensifies under adverse environmental stress conditions, particularly under high temperatures and water‐deficit conditions, leading to significant yield loss. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of flower abortion across a genetically diverse panel (MG III—IV) and quantify flower abortion under two different irrigation regimes. Two field experiments were conducted with a panel of 206 genotypes evaluated under 80% ET in 2023. In 2024, a representative sub‐set of 48 genotypes was tested under two irrigation regimes (80% and 40% ET). Flower number, pod number, flower abortion, and grain yield were recorded in both years, while plant height, node number, and seed number per pod per plant were recorded only in 2024. In 2023, atypical extreme heat events (> 40°C) led to elevated flower abortion rates (26%–80%). In contrast, under cooler conditions (< 35°C) in 2024, flower abortion ranged between 25% and 53% (80% ET) and 21%–51% (40% ET). Genotypes were classified on flower abortion and yield to identify high‐yielding genotypes with either high or low flower abortion. Soybean genotypes exhibited distinct flowering plasticity strategies, with some compensating for high abortion through increased flower production, while others maintained yield stability through higher flower retention. LG05‐4317 and PI506862 were identified as promising candidates having differential mechanisms for breeding high‐yielding cultivars with optimised abortion rates. Combined analysis highlighted that phenotypic plasticity in flower number and flower abortion can be exploited to increase soybean yield under diverse environmental conditions.
{"title":"Plasticity in Flower Number and Abortion Shape Soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Yield Under Different Environmental Stress","authors":"Juliana M. Espíndola Lima, Yusa Ichinose, Impa Somayanda, William Schapaugh, Raju Dhandapani, Nazir Ahmad, Avat Shekoofa, Heng Ye, Christopher Turner, Gunvant Patil, Henry T. Nguyen, Glen Ritchie, S. V. Krishna Jagadish","doi":"10.1111/jac.70151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70151","url":null,"abstract":"Flower abortion in soybeans is a natural process that intensifies under adverse environmental stress conditions, particularly under high temperatures and water‐deficit conditions, leading to significant yield loss. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of flower abortion across a genetically diverse panel (MG III—IV) and quantify flower abortion under two different irrigation regimes. Two field experiments were conducted with a panel of 206 genotypes evaluated under 80% ET in 2023. In 2024, a representative sub‐set of 48 genotypes was tested under two irrigation regimes (80% and 40% ET). Flower number, pod number, flower abortion, and grain yield were recorded in both years, while plant height, node number, and seed number per pod per plant were recorded only in 2024. In 2023, atypical extreme heat events (> 40°C) led to elevated flower abortion rates (26%–80%). In contrast, under cooler conditions (< 35°C) in 2024, flower abortion ranged between 25% and 53% (80% ET) and 21%–51% (40% ET). Genotypes were classified on flower abortion and yield to identify high‐yielding genotypes with either high or low flower abortion. Soybean genotypes exhibited distinct flowering plasticity strategies, with some compensating for high abortion through increased flower production, while others maintained yield stability through higher flower retention. LG05‐4317 and PI506862 were identified as promising candidates having differential mechanisms for breeding high‐yielding cultivars with optimised abortion rates. Combined analysis highlighted that phenotypic plasticity in flower number and flower abortion can be exploited to increase soybean yield under diverse environmental conditions.","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145801228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Climate change has a detrimental impact on the sustainable development of wheat yield and quality. Delaying sowing dates and adjusting sowing rates represent straightforward and effective strategies for mitigating such effects, albeit with their underlying mechanisms remaining poorly characterised. In this investigation, taking the North China Plain (NCP) as an example, we conducted a meta‐analysis of 59 studies and proving experiments at two locations. The results indicated that the wheat yield and ecological conditions had significant correlations, and reasonable late sowing and optimised sowing rates could significantly improve yield. In general, the relevant analysis showed that there was a positive correlation of 0.488 between soil organic matter and yield, and the negative correlations of yield on temperature and precipitation were 0.245 and 0.466, respectively. Furthermore, late sowing ≤ 10 days could increase yield by 3.05%–11.80% and the yield raised 1.31%–13.16% at a sowing rate of 201–300 kg/hm 2 under the precipitation > 600 mm, temperature ≥ 12°C and > 15 g/kg soil organic matter in the study. Late sowing and increasing sowing rates had a negative impact on wheat quality, which requires other management measures to be taken to balance production. In conclusion, our study elucidates the influence of late sowing and sowing rates on wheat yield and quality, providing a theoretical basis for subsequent research on the relationship between climate factors and crop yields–quality trade‐offs.
{"title":"Effects of Optimising Sowing Date and Rate on the Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Quality in North China Plain: A Meta‐Analysis and Proving Experiments","authors":"Huiping Chen, Feng Liu, Sifan Jia, Ruona Li, Jianhui Ma, Chunxi Li, Daijing Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jac.70130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70130","url":null,"abstract":"Climate change has a detrimental impact on the sustainable development of wheat yield and quality. Delaying sowing dates and adjusting sowing rates represent straightforward and effective strategies for mitigating such effects, albeit with their underlying mechanisms remaining poorly characterised. In this investigation, taking the North China Plain (NCP) as an example, we conducted a meta‐analysis of 59 studies and proving experiments at two locations. The results indicated that the wheat yield and ecological conditions had significant correlations, and reasonable late sowing and optimised sowing rates could significantly improve yield. In general, the relevant analysis showed that there was a positive correlation of 0.488 between soil organic matter and yield, and the negative correlations of yield on temperature and precipitation were 0.245 and 0.466, respectively. Furthermore, late sowing ≤ 10 days could increase yield by 3.05%–11.80% and the yield raised 1.31%–13.16% at a sowing rate of 201–300 kg/hm <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> under the precipitation > 600 mm, temperature ≥ 12°C and > 15 g/kg soil organic matter in the study. Late sowing and increasing sowing rates had a negative impact on wheat quality, which requires other management measures to be taken to balance production. In conclusion, our study elucidates the influence of late sowing and sowing rates on wheat yield and quality, providing a theoretical basis for subsequent research on the relationship between climate factors and crop yields–quality trade‐offs.","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145785994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The scarcity of good‐quality irrigation water has driven farmers to use saline water for crop production, which can adversely affect soil fertility and plant growth. Therefore, a long‐term (2006–2025) field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of saline water application by different irrigation methods on cotton seedling emergence and growth, and to promote safe saline water use. The field experiment employed two irrigation methods, namely border irrigation (B) and furrow irrigation with channels (F), with each irrigation method paired with six salt concentration levels (1.3, 3.4, 7.1, 10.6, 14.1, 17.7 dS·m −1 ; 1.3 dS·m −1 was the freshwater control). Observations showed that compared with furrow irrigation, the soil moisture contents and salinity levels under border irrigation increased by 0.9%–4.1% and 0.1%–27.7%, respectively. Additionally, soil moisture content and salinity rose as irrigation water salinity increased in both irrigation methods. Topsoil (0–20 cm) moisture content and salinity exhibited significant interannual fluctuations, with no steady salinity accumulation due to precipitation and associated climatic conditions. The seedling establishment rate declined with increasing water salinity under both methods; border irrigation was superior at water salinity ≤ 8.3 dS·m −1 , while furrow irrigation performed better above this threshold. Stability and sustainability of the establishment rate decreased markedly at water salinity ≥ 10.6 dS·m −1 . The relative establishment rate over the years (referenced to the freshwater treatments with an electrical conductivity of 1.3 dS·m −1 ) exhibited a significant quadratic relationship with irrigation water salinity. When the seedling establishment rate began to decline and reached a 10% reduction, the corresponding irrigation water salinity thresholds for border irrigation were 2.2 dS·m −1 and 10.0 dS·m −1 , and for furrow irrigation were 1.9 dS·m −1 and 10.4 dS·m −1 , respectively. High salinity significantly delayed cotton emergence and reduced seedling growth parameters (plant height, leaf area, and dry matter weight). Seedling growth was better under border irrigation than under furrow irrigation at irrigation water salinity ≤ 10.6 dS·m −1 . This study provides a scientific basis and practical reference for cotton cultivation using local saline water resources.
{"title":"Effects of Long‐Term Saline Water Irrigation on Cotton Emergence and Seedling Growth","authors":"Yunchao Xie, Hongkai Dang, Yudong Zheng, Dan Liu, Chunlian Zheng, Kejiang Li, Zaffar Malik, Anqi Zhang, Junpeng Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jac.70149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70149","url":null,"abstract":"The scarcity of good‐quality irrigation water has driven farmers to use saline water for crop production, which can adversely affect soil fertility and plant growth. Therefore, a long‐term (2006–2025) field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of saline water application by different irrigation methods on cotton seedling emergence and growth, and to promote safe saline water use. The field experiment employed two irrigation methods, namely border irrigation (B) and furrow irrigation with channels (F), with each irrigation method paired with six salt concentration levels (1.3, 3.4, 7.1, 10.6, 14.1, 17.7 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> ; 1.3 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> was the freshwater control). Observations showed that compared with furrow irrigation, the soil moisture contents and salinity levels under border irrigation increased by 0.9%–4.1% and 0.1%–27.7%, respectively. Additionally, soil moisture content and salinity rose as irrigation water salinity increased in both irrigation methods. Topsoil (0–20 cm) moisture content and salinity exhibited significant interannual fluctuations, with no steady salinity accumulation due to precipitation and associated climatic conditions. The seedling establishment rate declined with increasing water salinity under both methods; border irrigation was superior at water salinity ≤ 8.3 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> , while furrow irrigation performed better above this threshold. Stability and sustainability of the establishment rate decreased markedly at water salinity ≥ 10.6 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> . The relative establishment rate over the years (referenced to the freshwater treatments with an electrical conductivity of 1.3 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> ) exhibited a significant quadratic relationship with irrigation water salinity. When the seedling establishment rate began to decline and reached a 10% reduction, the corresponding irrigation water salinity thresholds for border irrigation were 2.2 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and 10.0 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> , and for furrow irrigation were 1.9 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and 10.4 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> , respectively. High salinity significantly delayed cotton emergence and reduced seedling growth parameters (plant height, leaf area, and dry matter weight). Seedling growth was better under border irrigation than under furrow irrigation at irrigation water salinity ≤ 10.6 dS·m <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> . This study provides a scientific basis and practical reference for cotton cultivation using local saline water resources.","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145759511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachana Dubey, Santosh Kumar, Anurag Ajay, Ved Prakash, Anup Das, Sanjeev Kumar, Govindaraj Kamalam Dinesh, A. K. Dubey, S. K. Dwivedi
The impact of climate change, as evidenced by increasingly higher temperatures and decreasing precipitation, presents a substantial threat to wheat crops globally. In the Indo‐Gangetic Plains (IGP), which is the breadbasket of India, it is evolving as the biggest threat to food security and livelihoods for the farming fraternity. A 3‐year field study evaluated the effects of drought and heat stress on wheat yield and how these effects interact with morphophysiological traits. This study deployed staggered sowing and controlled irrigation to simulate droughts synchronising with vegetative and reproductive stages of the crop across 13 wheat cultivars selected based on their prevalence among farmers. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson's correlation matrices were used to reduce data dimensionality for shortlisting independent morphophysiological variables before measuring average treatment effects. Findings highlighted a decline in levels of relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid under stress treatments. A sharp reduction of almost 50% in grain yield was observed when the crop encountered drought and heat stress simultaneously. Another finding revealed that RWC, chlorophyll content and proline accumulation were strongly associated with resilience to these stresses. The study identified two wheat cultivars (HD 2967 and HI 1531) that demonstrated superiority in coping with stress conditions consistently under both timely and late sowing conditions. These findings are insightful for wheat breeders, highlighting potential plant traits for climate‐resilient breeding programmes. The study also generated important evidence that can potentially inform policy makers around sowing time, irrigation scheduling and seed systems of wheat in eastern India and similar agroecological regions.
{"title":"Interactive Effects of Drought and Heat on Morphophysiological Components and Yield of Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in India","authors":"Rachana Dubey, Santosh Kumar, Anurag Ajay, Ved Prakash, Anup Das, Sanjeev Kumar, Govindaraj Kamalam Dinesh, A. K. Dubey, S. K. Dwivedi","doi":"10.1111/jac.70148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70148","url":null,"abstract":"The impact of climate change, as evidenced by increasingly higher temperatures and decreasing precipitation, presents a substantial threat to wheat crops globally. In the Indo‐Gangetic Plains (IGP), which is the breadbasket of India, it is evolving as the biggest threat to food security and livelihoods for the farming fraternity. A 3‐year field study evaluated the effects of drought and heat stress on wheat yield and how these effects interact with morphophysiological traits. This study deployed staggered sowing and controlled irrigation to simulate droughts synchronising with vegetative and reproductive stages of the crop across 13 wheat cultivars selected based on their prevalence among farmers. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson's correlation matrices were used to reduce data dimensionality for shortlisting independent morphophysiological variables before measuring average treatment effects. Findings highlighted a decline in levels of relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid under stress treatments. A sharp reduction of almost 50% in grain yield was observed when the crop encountered drought and heat stress simultaneously. Another finding revealed that RWC, chlorophyll content and proline accumulation were strongly associated with resilience to these stresses. The study identified two wheat cultivars (HD 2967 and HI 1531) that demonstrated superiority in coping with stress conditions consistently under both timely and late sowing conditions. These findings are insightful for wheat breeders, highlighting potential plant traits for climate‐resilient breeding programmes. The study also generated important evidence that can potentially inform policy makers around sowing time, irrigation scheduling and seed systems of wheat in eastern India and similar agroecological regions.","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145760114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vishnu Kumar, Vikram Singh, Suresh S. Dodake, Nilesh Magar, K. J. Yashavanthakumar, Arun Gupta, Bhudeva Singh Tyagi, Sindhu Sareen, Vikas Gupta, Gyanendra Singh, Suresh Kumar, Gyanendra Pratap Singh
Heat stress severely impairs wheat yields and poses significant challenges to food security. In the present investigation, 72 diverse bread wheat genotypes were evaluated in the completely randomised block design with two replicates at four locations under normal and heat stress conditions during Rabi , 2022–23. The mean maximum temperature was above congenial (> 25°C) at 27.9°C, 28.8°C, 33.4°C and 33.3°C at Karnal, Hisar, Niphad and Pune locations, which imposed adverse effects at the heading and grain filling stages. Under heat stress, the pooled mean grain yield varied from 294.8 g (DHTW60) to 660.2 g/plot (RWP2017‐21). The genotype DBW173 showed an 8.07% yield reduction under heat stress, followed by DBW187 (9.51%), PBW826 (10.25%), 29 th SAWYT‐303 (10.36%), Raj3765 (11.41%), and RWP2017‐21 (11.54%). The 1000 grain weight (TKW) reduction was also low for these genotypes, except for 29 th SAWYT‐303 (19.80%). Here, the yield stability index (YSI) and heat susceptibility index (HSI) ranged from 0.56 to 1.02 and −0.09 to 1.95, respectively. In contrast, the relative heat index (RHI) and percent yield reduction (PYR) varied from 0.73 to 1.31 and −1.99 to 43.63, respectively. The low HSI values (< 0.60) were recorded for NIAW1342, HI1605, DBW173, DBW187, PBW826, 29 th SAWYT‐303, 20 th HTWYT‐2, Raj3765, RWP2017‐21, K7903 and K9465. PCA clustered 13 heat stress indices into three clusters, where TOL, HSPI, HSI and PYR were grouped into a single segment. The genotypes DBW173, DBW187, HI1531, HI1605, NIAW1342, PBW826, Raj3765, RWP2017‐21, 20 th HTWYT‐2, 20 th HTWYT‐13, 20 th HTWYT‐41, 29 th SAWYT‐303 and WAP96 appeared as heat tolerant. The higher TKW, grains/spike, coupled with higher NDVI values, can be used as selection criteria under heat stress breeding. The indices HSI, PYR, HRI, YI and YSI can be employed effectively in future studies.
{"title":"Multivariate Analysis of Heat Stress Indices to Assess Bread Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Germplasm Under Timely and Late Sown Conditions","authors":"Vishnu Kumar, Vikram Singh, Suresh S. Dodake, Nilesh Magar, K. J. Yashavanthakumar, Arun Gupta, Bhudeva Singh Tyagi, Sindhu Sareen, Vikas Gupta, Gyanendra Singh, Suresh Kumar, Gyanendra Pratap Singh","doi":"10.1111/jac.70150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70150","url":null,"abstract":"Heat stress severely impairs wheat yields and poses significant challenges to food security. In the present investigation, 72 diverse bread wheat genotypes were evaluated in the completely randomised block design with two replicates at four locations under normal and heat stress conditions during <jats:italic>Rabi</jats:italic> , 2022–23. The mean maximum temperature was above congenial (> 25°C) at 27.9°C, 28.8°C, 33.4°C and 33.3°C at Karnal, Hisar, Niphad and Pune locations, which imposed adverse effects at the heading and grain filling stages. Under heat stress, the pooled mean grain yield varied from 294.8 g (DHTW60) to 660.2 g/plot (RWP2017‐21). The genotype DBW173 showed an 8.07% yield reduction under heat stress, followed by DBW187 (9.51%), PBW826 (10.25%), 29 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> SAWYT‐303 (10.36%), Raj3765 (11.41%), and RWP2017‐21 (11.54%). The 1000 grain weight (TKW) reduction was also low for these genotypes, except for 29 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> SAWYT‐303 (19.80%). Here, the yield stability index (YSI) and heat susceptibility index (HSI) ranged from 0.56 to 1.02 and −0.09 to 1.95, respectively. In contrast, the relative heat index (RHI) and percent yield reduction (PYR) varied from 0.73 to 1.31 and −1.99 to 43.63, respectively. The low HSI values (< 0.60) were recorded for NIAW1342, HI1605, DBW173, DBW187, PBW826, 29 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> SAWYT‐303, 20 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> HTWYT‐2, Raj3765, RWP2017‐21, K7903 and K9465. PCA clustered 13 heat stress indices into three clusters, where TOL, HSPI, HSI and PYR were grouped into a single segment. The genotypes DBW173, DBW187, HI1531, HI1605, NIAW1342, PBW826, Raj3765, RWP2017‐21, 20 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> HTWYT‐2, 20 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> HTWYT‐13, 20 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> HTWYT‐41, 29 <jats:sup>th</jats:sup> SAWYT‐303 and WAP96 appeared as heat tolerant. The higher TKW, grains/spike, coupled with higher NDVI values, can be used as selection criteria under heat stress breeding. The indices HSI, PYR, HRI, YI and YSI can be employed effectively in future studies.","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145752818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global seasonal heat and drought have become the main limiting factors affecting maize growth and grain yield. Huanong138 (HN138) and Zhengdan958 (ZD958) were used as the experimental material. The greenhouse experiment was conducted to uncover tassels and ear morphological development and grain fertility rate of maize under three stressors (heat (H), drought (D), and heat + drought (H + D)) at tasselling for 14 days. On average of the two hybrids, grain yield decreased by 17.3%, 31.2% and 45.4% in H, D and H + D, respectively, compared with CK. The grain fertility rate of stress treatments significantly reduced by 11.6%–28.7% under natural pollination (H♀ × H♂, D♀ × D♂), and reduced by 6.7%–24.7% under the condition of positive pollination (CK♂ × H or/and D♀), while reduced by 24.2%–48.9% under the condition of reverse pollination (CK♀ × H or/and D♂) than control, respectively. Moreover, pollen quantity, total spikelet number and density of tassels, silk viability significantly decreased, while anthesis silking interval was prolonged by 0.5–3.4 days in two genotypes under individual and combined stress than control. Individual and combined stress treatments suppressed grain sucrose metabolism via coordinated downregulation of sucrose synthase (SS) by 16.1%–59.2% and sucrose‐phosphate synthase (SPS) activities by 2.6%–44.9% in developing grains, concomitantly triggering sucrose translocation to leaves and stalk, suggesting source‐sink redistribution under stress constraints. Notably, the reduction of grain yield mainly resulted from stunted pollen development and limited sugar transport. These provided a strategy for future selected hybrids with the shorter ASI, higher pollen viability and quantity adapting well to climate change.
{"title":"Low Grain Yield of Maize ( Zea mays L) due to Stunted Tassel and Limited Sugar Transport Under Drought and Heat During Flowering","authors":"Rongfa Li, Kangna Yang, Zhibo Feng, Manman Jia, Hangzhao Guo, Yuepeng Wei, Zhenhua Yan, Yuxia Li, Xucun Jia, Qun Wang","doi":"10.1111/jac.70147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70147","url":null,"abstract":"Global seasonal heat and drought have become the main limiting factors affecting maize growth and grain yield. Huanong138 (HN138) and Zhengdan958 (ZD958) were used as the experimental material. The greenhouse experiment was conducted to uncover tassels and ear morphological development and grain fertility rate of maize under three stressors (heat (H), drought (D), and heat + drought (H + D)) at tasselling for 14 days. On average of the two hybrids, grain yield decreased by 17.3%, 31.2% and 45.4% in H, D and H + D, respectively, compared with CK. The grain fertility rate of stress treatments significantly reduced by 11.6%–28.7% under natural pollination (H♀ × H♂, D♀ × D♂), and reduced by 6.7%–24.7% under the condition of positive pollination (CK♂ × H or/and D♀), while reduced by 24.2%–48.9% under the condition of reverse pollination (CK♀ × H or/and D♂) than control, respectively. Moreover, pollen quantity, total spikelet number and density of tassels, silk viability significantly decreased, while anthesis silking interval was prolonged by 0.5–3.4 days in two genotypes under individual and combined stress than control. Individual and combined stress treatments suppressed grain sucrose metabolism via coordinated downregulation of sucrose synthase (SS) by 16.1%–59.2% and sucrose‐phosphate synthase (SPS) activities by 2.6%–44.9% in developing grains, concomitantly triggering sucrose translocation to leaves and stalk, suggesting source‐sink redistribution under stress constraints. Notably, the reduction of grain yield mainly resulted from stunted pollen development and limited sugar transport. These provided a strategy for future selected hybrids with the shorter ASI, higher pollen viability and quantity adapting well to climate change.","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145752816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}