Palm oil expansion, insecure land rights, and land-use conflict: A case of palm oil centre of Riau, Indonesia

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107325
Afrizal , Eka Vidya Putra , Linda Elida
{"title":"Palm oil expansion, insecure land rights, and land-use conflict: A case of palm oil centre of Riau, Indonesia","authors":"Afrizal ,&nbsp;Eka Vidya Putra ,&nbsp;Linda Elida","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Insecure rights tend to lead to land-use conflicts. The literature mainly focuses on the impact of insecure land rights on investment. Regarding the causes, studies mainly focus on the effect of state regulations. Little attention is given to the impact of the extractive economy on land rights security. This article scrutinizes how palm oil expansion manipulates insecure land rights, leading to land-use conflict. We pay attention to a particular land right in Indonesia that is based on the´ land status letter´ (Surat Keterangan Tanah, SKT), an initial proof of land ownership that is widely held by villagers in Indonesia. Studies have neglected this land right, as most attention has been on customary rights (Adat). Our main questions are: How do palm oil companies treat the SKT in their efforts to obtain more land for their plantations, and how do farmers try to fight for their SKT rights? Using a qualitative case study in Indonesia´s Riau Province, we show that because of a shared perception that SKTs offer security, villagers did not attempt to get a full legal land certificate from the Land Agency, and palm oil companies often manipulated SKT land rights to acquire land for new plantations. Limited access to conflict resolution mechanisms hampers landholders’ efforts to enforce their land rights, and our study suggests that the security of SKT land rights depends upon landholders’ ability to fight for their rights. NGOs did not help empower them in this matter in most cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107325"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724002783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insecure rights tend to lead to land-use conflicts. The literature mainly focuses on the impact of insecure land rights on investment. Regarding the causes, studies mainly focus on the effect of state regulations. Little attention is given to the impact of the extractive economy on land rights security. This article scrutinizes how palm oil expansion manipulates insecure land rights, leading to land-use conflict. We pay attention to a particular land right in Indonesia that is based on the´ land status letter´ (Surat Keterangan Tanah, SKT), an initial proof of land ownership that is widely held by villagers in Indonesia. Studies have neglected this land right, as most attention has been on customary rights (Adat). Our main questions are: How do palm oil companies treat the SKT in their efforts to obtain more land for their plantations, and how do farmers try to fight for their SKT rights? Using a qualitative case study in Indonesia´s Riau Province, we show that because of a shared perception that SKTs offer security, villagers did not attempt to get a full legal land certificate from the Land Agency, and palm oil companies often manipulated SKT land rights to acquire land for new plantations. Limited access to conflict resolution mechanisms hampers landholders’ efforts to enforce their land rights, and our study suggests that the security of SKT land rights depends upon landholders’ ability to fight for their rights. NGOs did not help empower them in this matter in most cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棕榈油扩张、不稳定的土地权和土地使用冲突:印度尼西亚廖内省棕榈油中心案例
无保障的权利往往会导致土地使用冲突。文献主要关注土地权不安全对投资的影响。关于原因,研究主要集中在国家法规的影响上。很少有人关注采掘经济对土地权利保障的影响。本文仔细研究了棕榈油扩张如何操纵不安全的土地权,从而导致土地使用冲突。我们关注的是印尼的一种特殊土地权,它以 "土地状况证明"(Surat Keterangan Tanah,SKT)为基础,是印尼村民普遍持有的土地所有权的初始证明。由于大部分研究关注的是传统权利(Adat),因此忽略了这一土地权利。我们的主要问题是棕榈油公司在努力为其种植园获得更多土地的过程中是如何对待传统土地所有权的,农民又是如何努力争取其传统土地所有权的?通过在印度尼西亚廖内省进行的定性案例研究,我们发现,由于人们普遍认为传统知识信托基金提供了保障,村民们并不试图从土地局获得完整的合法土地证书,而棕榈油公司则经常操纵传统知识信托基金的土地权,为新的种植园获取土地。有限的冲突解决机制阻碍了土地所有者行使其土地权利的努力,我们的研究表明,SKT 土地权利的安全性取决于土地所有者争取其权利的能力。在大多数情况下,非政府组织并没有帮助他们增强这方面的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
期刊最新文献
The engagement of environmental organizations on land policies: A case study of Pro Natura, Switzerland Multi-scenario simulation of low-carbon land use based on the SD-FLUS model in Changsha, China The smart city competitiveness index (SMCI): Conceptualization, modelling, application – An evidence-based insight Can urban low-carbon transformation affect the prices of its industrial land? An empirical study based on spatial regression discontinuity Quantifying supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services from a dynamic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1