Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Cirrhosis: Pharmacokinetics, Benefits and Drawbacks.

Q1 Medicine Current Gastroenterology Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s11894-024-00943-7
Gasser El-Azab
{"title":"Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Cirrhosis: Pharmacokinetics, Benefits and Drawbacks.","authors":"Gasser El-Azab","doi":"10.1007/s11894-024-00943-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the pharmacokinetics, benefits, and risks of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in cirrhotic patients, focusing on the appropriateness of their use and potential adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies highlight significant pharmacokinetic alterations in PPIs among cirrhotic patients, with marked increases in lansoprazole and pantoprazole exposure and relatively stable levels of esomeprazole. While effective for managing acid-related disorders and post-band ulcer rebleeding, evidence supporting PPI use for portal hypertension-related bleeding is lacking. Emerging research suggests potential adverse effects such as hepatic decompensation, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, and increased mortality, possibly linked to dysbiosis and bacterial translocation. PPI use in cirrhotic patients alters pharmacokinetics significantly, with esomeprazole potentially safer in advanced cirrhosis. The review advises caution in routine PPI use beyond acid-related conditions due to limited evidence and substantial risks. It underscores the need for careful risk-benefit assessments and exploration of alternative therapies. Future research should aim to identify safer management strategies for portal hypertension complications and to develop evidence-based guidelines for PPI use in patients with cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"323-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-024-00943-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review explores the pharmacokinetics, benefits, and risks of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in cirrhotic patients, focusing on the appropriateness of their use and potential adverse effects.

Recent findings: Recent studies highlight significant pharmacokinetic alterations in PPIs among cirrhotic patients, with marked increases in lansoprazole and pantoprazole exposure and relatively stable levels of esomeprazole. While effective for managing acid-related disorders and post-band ulcer rebleeding, evidence supporting PPI use for portal hypertension-related bleeding is lacking. Emerging research suggests potential adverse effects such as hepatic decompensation, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, and increased mortality, possibly linked to dysbiosis and bacterial translocation. PPI use in cirrhotic patients alters pharmacokinetics significantly, with esomeprazole potentially safer in advanced cirrhosis. The review advises caution in routine PPI use beyond acid-related conditions due to limited evidence and substantial risks. It underscores the need for careful risk-benefit assessments and exploration of alternative therapies. Future research should aim to identify safer management strategies for portal hypertension complications and to develop evidence-based guidelines for PPI use in patients with cirrhosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化患者的质子泵抑制剂:药代动力学、优点和缺点。
综述目的:本综述探讨了质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在肝硬化患者中的药代动力学、益处和风险,重点关注其使用的适宜性和潜在的不良反应:最新研究结果:最近的研究突出表明,肝硬化患者服用质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)会出现明显的药代动力学改变,兰索拉唑和泮托拉唑的暴露量明显增加,而埃索美拉唑的暴露量则相对稳定。虽然 PPI 可有效控制酸相关紊乱和带状溃疡后再出血,但缺乏支持 PPI 用于门静脉高压相关出血的证据。新的研究表明,可能与菌群失调和细菌易位有关的潜在不良反应包括肝功能失调、自发性细菌性腹膜炎、肝性脑病和死亡率升高。肝硬化患者使用 PPI 会显著改变药代动力学,在晚期肝硬化患者中使用埃索美拉唑可能更安全。由于证据有限且存在巨大风险,综述建议在酸相关疾病之外谨慎常规使用 PPI。它强调了谨慎进行风险-效益评估和探索替代疗法的必要性。未来的研究应旨在确定更安全的门静脉高压并发症管理策略,并为肝硬化患者使用 PPI 制定循证指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Gastroenterology Reports
Current Gastroenterology Reports Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: As the field of gastroenterology and hepatology rapidly evolves, the wealth of published literature can be overwhelming. The aim of the journal is to help readers stay abreast of such advances by offering authoritative, systematic reviews by leading experts. We accomplish this aim by appointing Section Editors who invite international experts to contribute review articles that highlight recent developments and important papers published in the past year. Major topics in gastroenterology are covered, including pediatric gastroenterology, neuromuscular disorders, infections, nutrition, and inflammatory bowel disease. These reviews provide clear, insightful summaries of expert perspectives relevant to clinical practice. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
期刊最新文献
Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopy Myotomy (G-POEM): Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls. The Current Landscape of Endoscopic Submucosal Training in the United States. Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage EUS LAMS vs. ERCP Trans-papillary Drainage. Yoga in Pediatric Gastroenterology. Perspectives and Advice from an Interventional Gastroenterologist at a Tertiary Academic Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1