首页 > 最新文献

Current Gastroenterology Reports最新文献

英文 中文
Expanded Indications in Advanced Endoscopic Resection of Malignant Gastrointestinal Lesions. 晚期内镜下胃肠道恶性病变切除术的扩展指征。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01029-8
Fredy Nehme, George M Wahba, Phillip S Ge

Purpose of review: Endoscopic resection (ER) has transformed the management of early gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies by offering curative treatment with low morbidity and organ preservation. Traditionally restricted to mucosal disease with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), recent advances in technique and risk stratification have prompted a re-evaluation of ER indications for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. This review summarizes the oncologic rationale, current evidence, and emerging technologies supporting the safe expansion of ER indications across GI malignancies.

Recent finding: s: Refined histopathologic criteria, enhanced en-bloc resection through endoscopic submucosal dissection, and the introduction of endoscopic full-thickness resection have expanded curative resection to select early GI malignancies previously considered surgical. Clinical outcomes from large series demonstrate comparable long-term survival to surgery when rigorous selection and surveillance criteria are applied, while minimizing morbidity. Molecular biomarkers, artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models, and sentinel node mapping are promising tools to further improve risk assessment for occult LNM. Expansion of ER indications for early GI cancers is feasible and increasingly practiced in expert centers with outcomes approximating those of surgical resection. Ongoing integration of precision diagnostics, molecular profiling, and AI-driven risk models promises to further refine patient selection. However, widespread adoption should proceed within structured, evidence-based frameworks to prevent undertreatment of potentially curable disease and maintain oncologic integrity.

回顾目的:内镜切除(ER)通过提供低发病率和器官保存的根治性治疗,改变了早期胃肠道(GI)恶性肿瘤的治疗方式。传统上仅限于淋巴结转移(LNM)风险可忽略不计的粘膜疾病,最近技术和风险分层的进展促使人们重新评估食管癌、胃癌和结直肠癌的ER适应症。这篇综述总结了肿瘤学原理、现有证据和支持在胃肠道恶性肿瘤中安全扩展ER适应症的新兴技术。最近的发现:5:完善的组织病理学标准,通过内镜下粘膜夹层加强整体切除,以及内镜全层切除的引入,扩大了治疗性切除的范围,以选择以前认为需要手术治疗的早期胃肠道恶性肿瘤。大系列临床结果表明,当采用严格的选择和监测标准时,长期生存率与手术相当,同时将发病率降到最低。分子生物标志物、基于人工智能(AI)的预测模型和前哨节点映射是进一步改善隐匿性LNM风险评估的有前途的工具。扩大早期胃肠道肿瘤的ER指征是可行的,并且在专家中心越来越多地实践,其结果接近手术切除。精确诊断、分子谱分析和人工智能驱动的风险模型的持续整合有望进一步优化患者选择。然而,广泛采用应在结构化的循证框架内进行,以防止对潜在可治愈疾病的治疗不足,并保持肿瘤学的完整性。
{"title":"Expanded Indications in Advanced Endoscopic Resection of Malignant Gastrointestinal Lesions.","authors":"Fredy Nehme, George M Wahba, Phillip S Ge","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01029-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-01029-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Endoscopic resection (ER) has transformed the management of early gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies by offering curative treatment with low morbidity and organ preservation. Traditionally restricted to mucosal disease with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), recent advances in technique and risk stratification have prompted a re-evaluation of ER indications for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. This review summarizes the oncologic rationale, current evidence, and emerging technologies supporting the safe expansion of ER indications across GI malignancies.</p><p><strong>Recent finding: </strong>s: Refined histopathologic criteria, enhanced en-bloc resection through endoscopic submucosal dissection, and the introduction of endoscopic full-thickness resection have expanded curative resection to select early GI malignancies previously considered surgical. Clinical outcomes from large series demonstrate comparable long-term survival to surgery when rigorous selection and surveillance criteria are applied, while minimizing morbidity. Molecular biomarkers, artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models, and sentinel node mapping are promising tools to further improve risk assessment for occult LNM. Expansion of ER indications for early GI cancers is feasible and increasingly practiced in expert centers with outcomes approximating those of surgical resection. Ongoing integration of precision diagnostics, molecular profiling, and AI-driven risk models promises to further refine patient selection. However, widespread adoption should proceed within structured, evidence-based frameworks to prevent undertreatment of potentially curable disease and maintain oncologic integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and vice versa: A Systematic Review of the current literature. 炎症性肠病患者的免疫球蛋白A血管炎的危险因素和结果,反之亦然:对当前文献的系统回顾。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01027-w
Samer A Al-Shbailat, Shahd Alqato, Asem Y Alkhalaileh, Rand Suleiman, Sadeen Zein Eddin, Alyaman Karajeh, Raghad G Al-Shbeilat, Rama Hussein, Hamzeh Hatamleh, Jaber H Jaradat, Khaled Alsagarat, Laila K Asfour

Purpose of review: This systematic review sought to thoroughly investigate the relationship between Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV), pinpointing both factors that increase risk and those that provide protection, laying the groundwork for future studies on specific treatments approaches to enhance the wellbeing of patients with IgAV and / or IBD.

Recent findings: There is a new and quickly expanding body of literature on this subject, indicating a rising interest in it. Recent research has sought to investigate the connection between newly emerged viruses, such as COVID-19, or medications like Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (anti-TNF-α), and the development, progression, and treatment approaches of IgAV in IBD patients, and vice versa. Certain recent research is centered on a particular age groups or the condition of the initial illness. IgAV has been observed for numerous years following the diagnosis of IBD, displaying manifestations in the skin, joints, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract. IBD encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and IgAV share immunological overlaps via dysregulated IgA production, genetic loci like HLA-DQA1/DQB1, and environmental triggers such as infections amid gut dysbiosis. IgAV often emerges as an IBD sequela or anti-TNF-α therapy complication, with TNF blockade potentially disrupting B-cell maturation, fostering Gd-IgA1 complexes, and neutrophil-driven inflammation. (31) studies encompassing (83) patients with co-occurring IBD and IgAV, predominantly males (60.2%) and younger individuals with confirmed dual diagnoses (95.2%). Compared to UC, more severe CD phenotypes and extended disease duration correlate with increased IgAV risk. Anti-TNF inhibitors appear to substantially contribute to IgAV onset in IBD patients. Most affected individuals develop IBD initially, followed by IgAV, whereas only a minority experience IBD subsequent to IgAV diagnosis. Ceasing anti-TNF-α therapy post-IgAV diagnosis may lead to IgAV resolution but could also trigger disease recurrence. The study's limited sample size has hindered the researchers from reaching conclusions via a meta-analysis. Additionally, the criteria utilized for IBD diagnosis have displayed inconsistency across all studies. Patients with IBD are at higher risk of developing IgAV, thus a high level of suspicion and prompt diagnostic assessment are crucial. To date, there have been no previous systematic reviews or meta-analyses highlighting a link between IgAV and IBD. Therefore, this systematic review is a pivotal endeavor to elucidate the complex relationship between these conditions, shaping future research in this area.

综述目的:本系统综述旨在彻底研究炎症性肠病(IBD)和免疫球蛋白A血管炎(IgAV)之间的关系,确定增加风险和提供保护的因素,为未来研究特异性治疗方法奠定基础,以提高IgAV和/或IBD患者的健康。最近的发现:关于这一主题的新文献数量迅速增加,表明人们对它的兴趣日益浓厚。最近的研究试图调查新出现的病毒(如COVID-19)或抗肿瘤坏死因子α (anti-TNF-α)等药物与IBD患者IgAV的发生、进展和治疗方法之间的联系,反之亦然。最近的一些研究集中在一个特定的年龄组或初始疾病的状况上。IgAV在IBD诊断后已被观察多年,表现为皮肤、关节、肾脏和胃肠道。包括克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎在内的IBD和IgAV通过失调的IgA产生、基因位点如HLA-DQA1/DQB1和环境触发因素(如肠道生态失调中的感染)共享免疫重叠。IgAV通常作为IBD的后遗症或抗TNF-α治疗并发症出现,TNF阻断可能会破坏b细胞成熟,促进Gd-IgA1复合物和中性粒细胞驱动的炎症。(31)包含(83)例IBD和IgAV共存患者的研究,主要是男性(60.2%)和确诊双重诊断的年轻人(95.2%)。与UC相比,更严重的CD表型和更长的疾病持续时间与IgAV风险增加相关。抗tnf抑制剂似乎在很大程度上促进了IBD患者IgAV的发作。大多数受影响的个体最初发展为IBD,随后是IgAV,而只有少数人在IgAV诊断后出现IBD。IgAV诊断后停止抗tnf -α治疗可能导致IgAV消退,但也可能引发疾病复发。该研究的样本量有限,阻碍了研究人员通过荟萃分析得出结论。此外,用于IBD诊断的标准在所有研究中都显示出不一致。IBD患者发生IgAV的风险较高,因此高度怀疑和及时诊断评估至关重要。迄今为止,尚无系统综述或荟萃分析强调IgAV与IBD之间的联系。因此,这一系统综述是阐明这些条件之间复杂关系的关键努力,塑造了该领域的未来研究。
{"title":"Risk Factors and Outcomes of Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and vice versa: A Systematic Review of the current literature.","authors":"Samer A Al-Shbailat, Shahd Alqato, Asem Y Alkhalaileh, Rand Suleiman, Sadeen Zein Eddin, Alyaman Karajeh, Raghad G Al-Shbeilat, Rama Hussein, Hamzeh Hatamleh, Jaber H Jaradat, Khaled Alsagarat, Laila K Asfour","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01027-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-025-01027-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This systematic review sought to thoroughly investigate the relationship between Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV), pinpointing both factors that increase risk and those that provide protection, laying the groundwork for future studies on specific treatments approaches to enhance the wellbeing of patients with IgAV and / or IBD.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is a new and quickly expanding body of literature on this subject, indicating a rising interest in it. Recent research has sought to investigate the connection between newly emerged viruses, such as COVID-19, or medications like Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (anti-TNF-α), and the development, progression, and treatment approaches of IgAV in IBD patients, and vice versa. Certain recent research is centered on a particular age groups or the condition of the initial illness. IgAV has been observed for numerous years following the diagnosis of IBD, displaying manifestations in the skin, joints, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract. IBD encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and IgAV share immunological overlaps via dysregulated IgA production, genetic loci like HLA-DQA1/DQB1, and environmental triggers such as infections amid gut dysbiosis. IgAV often emerges as an IBD sequela or anti-TNF-α therapy complication, with TNF blockade potentially disrupting B-cell maturation, fostering Gd-IgA1 complexes, and neutrophil-driven inflammation. (31) studies encompassing (83) patients with co-occurring IBD and IgAV, predominantly males (60.2%) and younger individuals with confirmed dual diagnoses (95.2%). Compared to UC, more severe CD phenotypes and extended disease duration correlate with increased IgAV risk. Anti-TNF inhibitors appear to substantially contribute to IgAV onset in IBD patients. Most affected individuals develop IBD initially, followed by IgAV, whereas only a minority experience IBD subsequent to IgAV diagnosis. Ceasing anti-TNF-α therapy post-IgAV diagnosis may lead to IgAV resolution but could also trigger disease recurrence. The study's limited sample size has hindered the researchers from reaching conclusions via a meta-analysis. Additionally, the criteria utilized for IBD diagnosis have displayed inconsistency across all studies. Patients with IBD are at higher risk of developing IgAV, thus a high level of suspicion and prompt diagnostic assessment are crucial. To date, there have been no previous systematic reviews or meta-analyses highlighting a link between IgAV and IBD. Therefore, this systematic review is a pivotal endeavor to elucidate the complex relationship between these conditions, shaping future research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in 2025: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back. 2025年的粪便微生物群移植:前进两步,后退一步。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01030-1
Charles B Miller, Geoffrey A Bader, Carl L Kay

Purpose of review: This review summarizes the history and current landscape of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), with an emphasis on use of the therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We clarify indications, evidence, and current recommendations for FMT-highlighting major advances and minor setbacks that have led to the state of FMT in 2025.

Recent findings: After decades of steady progress, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first FMT-based therapies: fecal microbiota, live-jslm and fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk-in 2022 and 2023, respectively. The 2024 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Practice Guideline on Fecal Microbiota-Based Therapies for Select Gastrointestinal Diseases made specific recommendations for conventional FMT and these FDA-approved therapies for multiple CDI presentations, as well as for IBD and IBS. Conventional FMT remains an option for CDI; however, OpenBiome's halt of shipped, frozen FMT preparations on December 31, 2024, has made access more challenging in 2025. Although first reported almost seventy years ago, extensive efforts over the last two decades have placed FMT in routine algorithms for many patients with CDI. While understanding of the intestinal microbiome's role in other gastrointestinal conditions is expanding, and FMT may modulate these pathways, additional evidence is needed before FMT becomes routine outside CDI.

综述目的:本文综述了粪便微生物群移植(FMT)的历史和现状,重点介绍了艰难梭菌感染(CDI)、炎症性肠病(IBD)和肠易激综合征(IBS)的治疗。我们阐明了FMT的适应症、证据和当前建议——强调了导致2025年FMT状态的主要进展和小挫折。最近的发现:经过几十年的稳步发展,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)分别于2022年和2023年批准了第一批基于fmt的疗法:粪便微生物群,活jslm和粪便微生物群孢子,活brpk。2024年美国胃肠病学协会(AGA)基于粪便微生物群的特定胃肠道疾病治疗实践指南对传统FMT和fda批准的多种CDI以及IBD和IBS的治疗方法提出了具体建议。传统FMT仍然是CDI的一种选择;然而,OpenBiome在2024年12月31日暂停了冷冻FMT制剂的出货,这使得在2025年获得FMT制剂变得更加困难。虽然第一次报道是在近70年前,但在过去20年的广泛努力中,FMT已经成为许多CDI患者的常规算法。虽然对肠道微生物组在其他胃肠道疾病中的作用的了解正在扩大,并且FMT可能调节这些途径,但在FMT成为CDI外的常规之前,还需要更多的证据。
{"title":"Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in 2025: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back.","authors":"Charles B Miller, Geoffrey A Bader, Carl L Kay","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01030-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-025-01030-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review summarizes the history and current landscape of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), with an emphasis on use of the therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We clarify indications, evidence, and current recommendations for FMT-highlighting major advances and minor setbacks that have led to the state of FMT in 2025.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>After decades of steady progress, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first FMT-based therapies: fecal microbiota, live-jslm and fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk-in 2022 and 2023, respectively. The 2024 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Practice Guideline on Fecal Microbiota-Based Therapies for Select Gastrointestinal Diseases made specific recommendations for conventional FMT and these FDA-approved therapies for multiple CDI presentations, as well as for IBD and IBS. Conventional FMT remains an option for CDI; however, OpenBiome's halt of shipped, frozen FMT preparations on December 31, 2024, has made access more challenging in 2025. Although first reported almost seventy years ago, extensive efforts over the last two decades have placed FMT in routine algorithms for many patients with CDI. While understanding of the intestinal microbiome's role in other gastrointestinal conditions is expanding, and FMT may modulate these pathways, additional evidence is needed before FMT becomes routine outside CDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799677/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Historical and Scientific Review of Anti-Reflux Surgery: Evolution, Evidence, and Future Directions. 抗反流手术的历史和科学回顾:演变、证据和未来方向。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01031-0
Moustafa Elshafei, Sjaak Pouwels, Andreas Pascher, Jens Peter Hoelzen, Mazen A Juratli

Purpose of review: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a condition, which is frequently encountered by gastroenterologists, otorhinolaryngologists, surgeons and general physicians and requires a multidisciplinary treatment when there is a high symptom burden in patients. Besides lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction there are several other risk factors that contribute to the development and symptoms (worsening) of GERD. While these lifestyle modifications and pharmacological therapies, particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), are first-line treatments, a subset of patients requires surgical intervention due to refractory symptoms or complications. This review traces the evolution of anti-reflux surgery, examining its historical milestones, advancements, and future prospects.

Recent findings: This review discusses the epidemiology of GERD, its pathophysiology, but also the development of Anti-Reflux Surgery (ARS). We will discuss the available evidence regarding different ARS procedures and will focus on individualised treatment for patients with GERD. In the treatment of patients with GERD we have to take into account that it might be challenging to personalise treatment and therefore optimise results. In this instance special considerations need to be taken for patients with GERD and obesity, patients with Barretts oesophagus, patients after bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) and patients with oesophageal motility disorders.

综述目的:胃食管反流病(GERD)是胃肠科、耳鼻喉科、外科医生和普通内科医生经常遇到的一种疾病,当患者出现高症状负担时,需要多学科治疗。除了食管下括约肌(LES)功能障碍外,还有其他一些危险因素可导致胃食管反流的发展和症状(恶化)。虽然这些生活方式的改变和药物治疗,特别是质子泵抑制剂(PPIs),是一线治疗,但由于难治性症状或并发症,一部分患者需要手术干预。本文回顾了抗反流手术的发展历程,考察了其历史里程碑、进展和未来前景。本文综述了反流胃食管反流的流行病学、病理生理学以及抗反流手术(ARS)的发展。我们将讨论关于不同ARS程序的现有证据,并将重点放在胃食管反流患者的个体化治疗上。在治疗反流胃食管反流患者时,我们必须考虑到个性化治疗可能具有挑战性,因此优化结果。在这种情况下,需要特别考虑GERD和肥胖患者、Barretts食管患者、减肥和代谢手术(BMS)后患者和食管运动障碍患者。
{"title":"A Historical and Scientific Review of Anti-Reflux Surgery: Evolution, Evidence, and Future Directions.","authors":"Moustafa Elshafei, Sjaak Pouwels, Andreas Pascher, Jens Peter Hoelzen, Mazen A Juratli","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01031-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-025-01031-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a condition, which is frequently encountered by gastroenterologists, otorhinolaryngologists, surgeons and general physicians and requires a multidisciplinary treatment when there is a high symptom burden in patients. Besides lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction there are several other risk factors that contribute to the development and symptoms (worsening) of GERD. While these lifestyle modifications and pharmacological therapies, particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), are first-line treatments, a subset of patients requires surgical intervention due to refractory symptoms or complications. This review traces the evolution of anti-reflux surgery, examining its historical milestones, advancements, and future prospects.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This review discusses the epidemiology of GERD, its pathophysiology, but also the development of Anti-Reflux Surgery (ARS). We will discuss the available evidence regarding different ARS procedures and will focus on individualised treatment for patients with GERD. In the treatment of patients with GERD we have to take into account that it might be challenging to personalise treatment and therefore optimise results. In this instance special considerations need to be taken for patients with GERD and obesity, patients with Barretts oesophagus, patients after bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) and patients with oesophageal motility disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in 2025 and Beyond. 2025年及以后处理急性严重溃疡性结肠炎。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01025-y
Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Syed Adeel Hassan, Jeffrey Aaron Berinstein

Purpose of review: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a high-risk condition with suboptimal clinical outcomes despite advancements in diagnostics, prognostication, and therapies. This review synthesizes recent evidence to address critical gaps in care, focusing on optimizing medical strategies to reduce colectomy rates and improve patient outcomes.

Recent findings: Recent studies have identified novel biomarkers and predictive models for stratifying patients as high-risk for colectomy. Several emerging therapeutic strategies to optimize care have also been explored. Intensified infliximab dosing has not consistently shown improved clinical outcomes across all patients with ASUC, though it may benefit a subset of patients with unfavorable pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, Janus kinase inhibitors have shown promise in reducing colectomy rates, offering a potential alternative for select patients; however, supporting evidence remains preliminary. Despite these advancements, colectomy remains exceedingly common but continues to serve as a critical intervention to reduce complications and mortality. This underscores the therapeutic efficacy ceiling that still exists in our current approach to ASUC in 2025. Modern ASUC management prioritizes rapid risk stratification (using clinical, endoscopic, and biomarker data) and patient-tailored advanced therapy selection. Future strategies should focus on conducting rigorous trials of emerging agents in comparison to our current protocols, while integrating real-time, personalized, and dynamic prognostic tools to reduce heterogeneity in treatment response.

回顾目的:急性严重溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)仍然是一种高风险疾病,尽管在诊断、预后和治疗方面取得了进展。本综述综合了最近的证据,以解决护理中的关键差距,重点是优化医疗策略,以降低结肠切除术率并改善患者预后。最近的发现:最近的研究已经确定了新的生物标志物和预测模型,用于分层结肠切除术高危患者。一些新兴的治疗策略,以优化护理也进行了探讨。强化英夫利昔单抗剂量并没有在所有ASUC患者中一致显示出改善的临床结果,尽管它可能对药代动力学不利的一部分患者有益。此外,Janus激酶抑制剂已显示出降低结肠切除术率的希望,为选定的患者提供了潜在的替代方案;然而,支持证据仍然是初步的。尽管有这些进步,结肠切除术仍然非常普遍,但仍然是减少并发症和死亡率的关键干预措施。这强调了我们目前治疗ASUC的方法在2025年仍然存在的治疗效果上限。现代ASUC管理优先考虑快速风险分层(使用临床,内镜和生物标志物数据)和患者定制的先进治疗选择。与我们目前的方案相比,未来的策略应侧重于对新兴药物进行严格的试验,同时整合实时、个性化和动态预后工具,以减少治疗反应的异质性。
{"title":"Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in 2025 and Beyond.","authors":"Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Syed Adeel Hassan, Jeffrey Aaron Berinstein","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01025-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-025-01025-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a high-risk condition with suboptimal clinical outcomes despite advancements in diagnostics, prognostication, and therapies. This review synthesizes recent evidence to address critical gaps in care, focusing on optimizing medical strategies to reduce colectomy rates and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have identified novel biomarkers and predictive models for stratifying patients as high-risk for colectomy. Several emerging therapeutic strategies to optimize care have also been explored. Intensified infliximab dosing has not consistently shown improved clinical outcomes across all patients with ASUC, though it may benefit a subset of patients with unfavorable pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, Janus kinase inhibitors have shown promise in reducing colectomy rates, offering a potential alternative for select patients; however, supporting evidence remains preliminary. Despite these advancements, colectomy remains exceedingly common but continues to serve as a critical intervention to reduce complications and mortality. This underscores the therapeutic efficacy ceiling that still exists in our current approach to ASUC in 2025. Modern ASUC management prioritizes rapid risk stratification (using clinical, endoscopic, and biomarker data) and patient-tailored advanced therapy selection. Future strategies should focus on conducting rigorous trials of emerging agents in comparison to our current protocols, while integrating real-time, personalized, and dynamic prognostic tools to reduce heterogeneity in treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779689/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pediatric Culinary Medicine: Current Status, Challenges and Opportunities. 儿童烹饪医学:现状、挑战和机遇。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01024-z
Michelle Loy, Ashish Chogle, Hanna Tracy, Neha R Santucci, Khyati Mehta, Liane S Sadder, Rima Jibaly, Alain J Benitez, Maria R Mascarenhas

Purpose of review: The health benefits of food are being increasingly recognized. Exposing children and parents to culinary medicine enables them to make healthy food choices with potential for long term health improvement. Here we review pediatric literature on culinary medicine, share results of a recent practice survey, and review strategies for program development and implementation including training opportunities.

Recent findings: There is growing evidence of interest in culinary medicine in pediatrics. A pediatric culinary medicine practice survey directed to current practitioners in the USA showed great variability. Common challenges associated with the practice included sustained funding, program management needs and getting the message out to the right audience. Based on survey responses and current literature, we generated educational resources and practice recommendations to further knowledge on pediatric culinary medicine practice. Several opportunities exist for practitioners to further the field of pediatric culinary medicine by engaging in additional clinical practices, research, education, and advocacy.

综述目的:人们越来越认识到食物对健康的益处。让孩子和父母接触烹饪药物,可以使他们做出健康的食物选择,从而有可能长期改善健康。在这里,我们回顾了烹饪医学的儿科文献,分享了最近的实践调查结果,并回顾了项目开发和实施的策略,包括培训机会。最近的发现:有越来越多的证据表明,儿科对烹饪医学感兴趣。一项针对美国当前从业人员的儿科烹饪医学实践调查显示出很大的可变性。与实践相关的常见挑战包括持续的资金、项目管理需求以及将信息传递给正确的受众。根据调查结果和现有文献,我们生成了教育资源和实践建议,以进一步了解儿科烹饪医学实践。从业人员有几个机会通过参与额外的临床实践、研究、教育和宣传来进一步发展儿科烹饪医学领域。
{"title":"Pediatric Culinary Medicine: Current Status, Challenges and Opportunities.","authors":"Michelle Loy, Ashish Chogle, Hanna Tracy, Neha R Santucci, Khyati Mehta, Liane S Sadder, Rima Jibaly, Alain J Benitez, Maria R Mascarenhas","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01024-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-01024-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The health benefits of food are being increasingly recognized. Exposing children and parents to culinary medicine enables them to make healthy food choices with potential for long term health improvement. Here we review pediatric literature on culinary medicine, share results of a recent practice survey, and review strategies for program development and implementation including training opportunities.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is growing evidence of interest in culinary medicine in pediatrics. A pediatric culinary medicine practice survey directed to current practitioners in the USA showed great variability. Common challenges associated with the practice included sustained funding, program management needs and getting the message out to the right audience. Based on survey responses and current literature, we generated educational resources and practice recommendations to further knowledge on pediatric culinary medicine practice. Several opportunities exist for practitioners to further the field of pediatric culinary medicine by engaging in additional clinical practices, research, education, and advocacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145849101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Building a Third SPACE Endoscopy Program Within a Community Hospital. 在社区医院内建立第三空间内窥镜检查项目。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01017-y
Melvin Simien, Victoria Archibald

Purpose of review: Building a successful third space endoscopy program (TSE) requires alignment across multiple domains. The strategy should be consistent with the needs of the hospital and community at large. We hope to outline clinical questions and strategies for successfully building a TSE in a community hospital setting.

Recent findings: The field of third space endoscopy has advanced beyond traditional ESD and POEM to include derivatives of POEM and submucosal tunneling techniques including submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). There is a sparsity of data about third space endoscopy in American community hospitals. Focusing on proper training through mentorship, industry sponsored courses, appropriate indications can allow for a successful implementation of TSE program within a community hospital. Future research should focus on outcomes in TSE outside of academic institutions.

综述目的:建立一个成功的第三空间内窥镜项目(TSE)需要跨多个领域的协调。该战略应符合医院和整个社区的需要。我们希望概述在社区医院环境中成功建立TSE的临床问题和策略。最近发现:第三空间内窥镜领域已经超越传统的ESD和POEM,包括POEM和粘膜下隧道技术的衍生物,包括粘膜下隧道内镜切除术(STER)。关于美国社区医院第三空间内窥镜检查的数据很少。通过导师指导、行业赞助的课程、适当的适应症进行适当的培训,可以使TSE方案在社区医院内成功实施。未来的研究应将重点放在学术机构之外的TSE成果上。
{"title":"Building a Third SPACE Endoscopy Program Within a Community Hospital.","authors":"Melvin Simien, Victoria Archibald","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01017-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-01017-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Building a successful third space endoscopy program (TSE) requires alignment across multiple domains. The strategy should be consistent with the needs of the hospital and community at large. We hope to outline clinical questions and strategies for successfully building a TSE in a community hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The field of third space endoscopy has advanced beyond traditional ESD and POEM to include derivatives of POEM and submucosal tunneling techniques including submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). There is a sparsity of data about third space endoscopy in American community hospitals. Focusing on proper training through mentorship, industry sponsored courses, appropriate indications can allow for a successful implementation of TSE program within a community hospital. Future research should focus on outcomes in TSE outside of academic institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145849121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnosis and Management of Food Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis. 食物蛋白诱发过敏性直结肠炎的诊断与治疗。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01022-1
Mahala Leney, Francesca Kahale, Victoria M Martin

Purpose of review: Food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP) is a frequent cause of rectal bleeding in otherwise healthy infants. Although benign and self-limited, wide variation in diagnostic and management practices often leads to overdiagnosis, unnecessary dietary restriction, and disruption of breastfeeding. This review summarizes contemporary evidence to guide a pragmatic, challenge-anchored approach to diagnosis and management.

Recent findings: Diagnosis of FPIAP remains clinical, based on symptom resolution after elimination and recurrence upon reintroduction of the trigger food; however, confirmatory challenges are seldom performed. Fecal calprotectin and other proposed biomarkers-such as eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, zonulin, and microbiome signatures-show poor reliability in infants and are not ready for clinical use. Management should prioritize the least restrictive diet - maternal dairy elimination for breastfed infants and extensively hydrolyzed formulas for formula-fed infants - only in challenge-proven FPIAP. Growing data support earlier reintroduction once colitis resolves, and early introduction of other allergens may reduce future IgE-mediated allergy risk. A standardized, challenge-confirmed framework minimizes over-restriction and supports continued breastfeeding. Future priorities include validation of non-invasive biomarkers and trials comparing timing and strategies for safe dietary reintroduction in FPIAP.

综述的目的:食物蛋白诱导的过敏性直结肠炎(FPIAP)是导致其他健康婴儿直肠出血的常见原因。虽然是良性和自限性的,但诊断和管理方法的广泛差异往往导致过度诊断、不必要的饮食限制和母乳喂养中断。这篇综述总结了当代的证据,以指导一个务实的,挑战锚定的方法来诊断和管理。最新发现:FPIAP的诊断仍然是临床诊断,基于消除后的症状缓解和重新引入触发食物后的复发;然而,很少进行验证性挑战。粪便钙保护蛋白和其他提出的生物标志物,如嗜酸性粒细胞衍生的神经毒素、zonulin和微生物组特征,在婴儿中显示出较差的可靠性,尚未准备好临床应用。管理部门应优先考虑限制最少的饮食——母乳喂养的婴儿不吃母乳,配方奶喂养的婴儿不吃广泛水解的配方奶粉——只有在经过挑战证明的FPIAP中。越来越多的数据支持在结肠炎消退后尽早重新引入,并且早期引入其他过敏原可能降低未来ige介导的过敏风险。标准化的、经挑战确认的框架可最大限度地减少过度限制并支持继续母乳喂养。未来的优先事项包括验证非侵入性生物标志物和比较FPIAP安全饮食重新引入的时间和策略的试验。
{"title":"Diagnosis and Management of Food Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis.","authors":"Mahala Leney, Francesca Kahale, Victoria M Martin","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01022-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-01022-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP) is a frequent cause of rectal bleeding in otherwise healthy infants. Although benign and self-limited, wide variation in diagnostic and management practices often leads to overdiagnosis, unnecessary dietary restriction, and disruption of breastfeeding. This review summarizes contemporary evidence to guide a pragmatic, challenge-anchored approach to diagnosis and management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Diagnosis of FPIAP remains clinical, based on symptom resolution after elimination and recurrence upon reintroduction of the trigger food; however, confirmatory challenges are seldom performed. Fecal calprotectin and other proposed biomarkers-such as eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, zonulin, and microbiome signatures-show poor reliability in infants and are not ready for clinical use. Management should prioritize the least restrictive diet - maternal dairy elimination for breastfed infants and extensively hydrolyzed formulas for formula-fed infants - only in challenge-proven FPIAP. Growing data support earlier reintroduction once colitis resolves, and early introduction of other allergens may reduce future IgE-mediated allergy risk. A standardized, challenge-confirmed framework minimizes over-restriction and supports continued breastfeeding. Future priorities include validation of non-invasive biomarkers and trials comparing timing and strategies for safe dietary reintroduction in FPIAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Nodal and Gastrointestinal Follicular Lymphoma: Current Advances and Future Perspectives. CD19 CAR-T细胞治疗复发或难治性淋巴结和胃肠道滤泡性淋巴瘤:当前进展和未来展望
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-01028-9
Takuya Watanabe

Purpose of review: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent B-cell lymphoma, yet primary gastrointestinal FL (GI-FL) remains poorly defined, and treatment of relapsed/refractory cases is controversial. This review aims to critically evaluate the role of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in nodal and GI-FL, highlighting key clinical trials and the unique biological considerations of GI involvement.

Recent findings: Pivotal trials such as ZUMA-5, ELARA, and TRANSCEND FL have demonstrated high overall and complete response rates with durable progression-free survival in patients with relapsed/refractory FL. Liso-cel in particular has shown a favourable efficacy-toxicity balance, including in patients with transformed disease or progression within 24 months (POD24). However, data specific to GI-FL are scarce, and emerging evidence suggests that its microenvironment, immune checkpoint expression, and mutational profile may influence CAR-T responses differently from nodal FL. CD19 CAR-T therapy represents a major therapeutic advance for relapsed/refractory FL and holds promise for patients with advanced or high-risk GI-FL. Nonetheless, the rarity of GI-FL, limited dedicated clinical data, and challenges such as treatment-related toxicities, costs, and accessibility warrant further prospective studies. Integrating biomarker-based patient selection and GI-FL-specific trial designs will be crucial to optimise the application of CAR-T therapy in this distinct subtype.

回顾目的:滤泡性淋巴瘤(滤泡性淋巴瘤)是最常见的惰性b细胞淋巴瘤,但原发性胃肠道滤泡性淋巴瘤(GI-FL)的定义尚不明确,复发/难治性病例的治疗也存在争议。本综述旨在批判性地评估cd19靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞治疗在淋巴结和GI- fl中的作用,强调关键的临床试验和GI受损伤的独特生物学考虑。最近的发现:关键试验,如ZUMA-5、ELARA和TRANSCEND FL,在复发/难治性FL患者中显示出高的总体和完全缓解率和持久的无进展生存期。特别是Liso-cel,包括在24个月内疾病转化或进展的患者(POD24)中,显示出良好的疗效-毒性平衡。然而,GI-FL的特异性数据很少,新出现的证据表明,其微环境、免疫检查点表达和突变谱可能对CAR-T反应的影响不同于淋巴结性FL。CD19 CAR-T治疗代表了复发/难治性FL的主要治疗进展,并为晚期或高风险GI-FL患者带来了希望。然而,GI-FL的罕见性、有限的专用临床数据以及治疗相关的毒性、成本和可及性等挑战需要进一步的前瞻性研究。整合基于生物标志物的患者选择和gi - fl特异性试验设计对于优化CAR-T治疗在这一独特亚型中的应用至关重要。
{"title":"CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Nodal and Gastrointestinal Follicular Lymphoma: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Takuya Watanabe","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01028-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-01028-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent B-cell lymphoma, yet primary gastrointestinal FL (GI-FL) remains poorly defined, and treatment of relapsed/refractory cases is controversial. This review aims to critically evaluate the role of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in nodal and GI-FL, highlighting key clinical trials and the unique biological considerations of GI involvement.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Pivotal trials such as ZUMA-5, ELARA, and TRANSCEND FL have demonstrated high overall and complete response rates with durable progression-free survival in patients with relapsed/refractory FL. Liso-cel in particular has shown a favourable efficacy-toxicity balance, including in patients with transformed disease or progression within 24 months (POD24). However, data specific to GI-FL are scarce, and emerging evidence suggests that its microenvironment, immune checkpoint expression, and mutational profile may influence CAR-T responses differently from nodal FL. CD19 CAR-T therapy represents a major therapeutic advance for relapsed/refractory FL and holds promise for patients with advanced or high-risk GI-FL. Nonetheless, the rarity of GI-FL, limited dedicated clinical data, and challenges such as treatment-related toxicities, costs, and accessibility warrant further prospective studies. Integrating biomarker-based patient selection and GI-FL-specific trial designs will be crucial to optimise the application of CAR-T therapy in this distinct subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rectal Prolapse in the Pediatric Population. 小儿直肠脱垂
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-024-00953-5
James K Moon, John D Stratigis, Aaron M Lipskar

Purpose of review: Rectal prolapse in the pediatric population presents a clinical challenge with wide variability in etiology, presentation, work-up and management. In this article, we reviewed the evidence supporting various medical and surgical treatment options as well as the recent trends amongst pediatric surgeons.

Recent findings: Medical therapy is highly effective in most patients, with bowel management programs being particularly successful. Nonetheless, medically refractory disease, often seen in older children and in children with behavioral/psychiatric disorders, can be challenging. Sclerotherapy with ethanol or 5% phenol can be effective local treatments. 15% hypertonic saline, 50% dextrose, and Deflux are additional safe alternatives. Perianal procedures and perineal procedures are less invasive surgical options, but transabdominal rectopexy appears to be the favored treatment for disease refractory to local treatment. Transabdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy, the recommended operation in the adult population for patients with prolapse and constipation, appears only to be preferred in the pediatric population for postoperative recurrences.

Recent findings: While outcomes of medical treatment for pediatric rectal prolapse are excellent, sclerotherapy and transabdominal rectopexy are effective options for refractory disease preferred by most pediatric surgeons.

审查目的:小儿直肠脱垂是一项临床挑战,其病因、表现、检查和治疗方法千差万别。在本文中,我们回顾了支持各种药物和手术治疗方案的证据,以及儿科外科医生的最新趋势:最新研究结果:药物治疗对大多数患者都非常有效,其中肠道管理方案尤为成功。然而,药物难治性疾病(通常见于年龄较大的儿童和有行为/精神障碍的儿童)可能具有挑战性。使用乙醇或 5%苯酚进行硬化剂注射是一种有效的局部治疗方法。15% 高渗盐水、50% 葡萄糖和 Deflux 也是安全的替代疗法。肛周手术和会阴手术是创伤较小的手术选择,但对于局部治疗无效的疾病,经腹直肠切除术似乎是最受欢迎的治疗方法。经腹直肠切除术加乙状结肠切除术是成人脱肛和便秘患者的推荐手术,但在儿科患者中,似乎只有术后复发的患者才会选择经腹直肠切除术:最近的研究结果:虽然小儿直肠脱垂的药物治疗效果很好,但硬化疗法和经腹直肠切除术是大多数小儿外科医生首选的治疗难治性疾病的有效方法。
{"title":"Rectal Prolapse in the Pediatric Population.","authors":"James K Moon, John D Stratigis, Aaron M Lipskar","doi":"10.1007/s11894-024-00953-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-024-00953-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Rectal prolapse in the pediatric population presents a clinical challenge with wide variability in etiology, presentation, work-up and management. In this article, we reviewed the evidence supporting various medical and surgical treatment options as well as the recent trends amongst pediatric surgeons.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Medical therapy is highly effective in most patients, with bowel management programs being particularly successful. Nonetheless, medically refractory disease, often seen in older children and in children with behavioral/psychiatric disorders, can be challenging. Sclerotherapy with ethanol or 5% phenol can be effective local treatments. 15% hypertonic saline, 50% dextrose, and Deflux are additional safe alternatives. Perianal procedures and perineal procedures are less invasive surgical options, but transabdominal rectopexy appears to be the favored treatment for disease refractory to local treatment. Transabdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy, the recommended operation in the adult population for patients with prolapse and constipation, appears only to be preferred in the pediatric population for postoperative recurrences.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While outcomes of medical treatment for pediatric rectal prolapse are excellent, sclerotherapy and transabdominal rectopexy are effective options for refractory disease preferred by most pediatric surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585491/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Gastroenterology Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1