Prevalence and determinants of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes in Hungary based on the nationally representative cross-sectional H-UNCOVER study

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111834
{"title":"Prevalence and determinants of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes in Hungary based on the nationally representative cross-sectional H-UNCOVER study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To estimate prevalence of diagnosed (dDM) and undiagnosed diabetes (uDM) in Hungary and investigate determinants of uDM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data was obtained from the nationally representative H-UNCOVER study. As laboratory measurements were available for 11/19 Hungarian counties, n = 5,974/17,787 people were eligible. After exclusions, 5,673 (representing 4,976,097 people) were included. dDM was defined by self-reporting, while uDM as negative self-reporting and elevated fasting glucose (≥7 mmol/l) and/or HbA1c (≥48 mmol/mol). Logistic regression for complex samples was used to calculate comparisons between dDM and uDM adjusted for age and BMI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Diabetes prevalence was 12.0 %/11.9 % (women/men, 95 %CI:10.7–13.4 %/10.7–13.2 %), while 2.2 %/2.8 % (1.7–2.8 %/2.2–3.6 %) of women/men were uDM. While the proportion of uDM vs. dDM was similar for women ≥ 40, men in their forties had the highest odds for uDM. Neither unemployment (women/men OR:0.58 [0.14–2.45]/0.50 [0.13–1.92]), nor education level (tertiary vs. primary; women/men OR: 1.16 [0.53–2.56]/ 0.53 [0.24–1.18]) were associated with uDM. The risk of uDM was lower in both sexes with chronic morbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We report higher prevalence of diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes than previous Hungarian estimates. The finding that socioeconomic factors are not associated to uDM suggests that universal health care could provide equitable access to diabetes diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724007447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To estimate prevalence of diagnosed (dDM) and undiagnosed diabetes (uDM) in Hungary and investigate determinants of uDM.

Methods

Data was obtained from the nationally representative H-UNCOVER study. As laboratory measurements were available for 11/19 Hungarian counties, n = 5,974/17,787 people were eligible. After exclusions, 5,673 (representing 4,976,097 people) were included. dDM was defined by self-reporting, while uDM as negative self-reporting and elevated fasting glucose (≥7 mmol/l) and/or HbA1c (≥48 mmol/mol). Logistic regression for complex samples was used to calculate comparisons between dDM and uDM adjusted for age and BMI.

Results

Diabetes prevalence was 12.0 %/11.9 % (women/men, 95 %CI:10.7–13.4 %/10.7–13.2 %), while 2.2 %/2.8 % (1.7–2.8 %/2.2–3.6 %) of women/men were uDM. While the proportion of uDM vs. dDM was similar for women ≥ 40, men in their forties had the highest odds for uDM. Neither unemployment (women/men OR:0.58 [0.14–2.45]/0.50 [0.13–1.92]), nor education level (tertiary vs. primary; women/men OR: 1.16 [0.53–2.56]/ 0.53 [0.24–1.18]) were associated with uDM. The risk of uDM was lower in both sexes with chronic morbidities.

Conclusions

We report higher prevalence of diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes than previous Hungarian estimates. The finding that socioeconomic factors are not associated to uDM suggests that universal health care could provide equitable access to diabetes diagnosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据具有全国代表性的横断面 H-UNCOVER 研究,匈牙利确诊和未确诊糖尿病的患病率和决定因素。
目的:估算匈牙利已确诊糖尿病(dDM)和未确诊糖尿病(uDM)的患病率,并调查uDM的决定因素:数据来自具有全国代表性的 H-UNCOVER 研究。由于匈牙利 11/19 个县都有实验室测量数据,因此符合条件的人数为 5974/17787 人。dDM 由自我报告定义,而 uDM 是指自我报告为阴性且空腹血糖升高(≥7 mmol/l)和/或 HbA1c 升高(≥48 mmol/mol)。在对年龄和体重指数进行调整后,使用复合样本的逻辑回归计算出 dDM 和 uDM 的比较结果:糖尿病患病率为 12.0%/11.9%(女性/男性,95%CI:10.7-13.4%/10.7-13.2%),而 2.2%/2.8%(1.7-2.8%/2.2-3.6%)的女性/男性为 uDM。虽然uDM与dDM的比例在≥40岁的女性中相似,但40多岁的男性患uDM的几率最高。失业率(女性/男性OR:0.58 [0.14-2.45]/0.50 [0.13-1.92])和教育水平(大专与小学;女性/男性OR:1.16 [0.53-2.56]/ 0.53 [0.24-1.18])均与uDM无关。患有慢性疾病的男女患尿毒症的风险都较低:我们报告的糖尿病和未确诊糖尿病患病率高于匈牙利以前的估计值。社会经济因素与uDM无关的发现表明,全民医疗保健可以提供公平的糖尿病诊断机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Computed tomography-based body composition indicative of diabetes after hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in relation to body composition, estimated insulin sensitivity and arterial stiffness in adults with type 1 diabetes Role of microRNAs in diabetic foot ulcers: Mechanisms and possible interventions Early life socioeconomic inequalities and type 2 diabetes incidence: Longitudinal analyses in the Maastricht study Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1