Effects of Velocity Loss During Bench-Press Training With Light Relative Loads.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY International journal of sports physiology and performance Pub Date : 2024-08-21 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2023-0529
Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza, José Páez-Maldonado, Clara Cano-Castillo, Beatriz Bachero-Mena, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Fernando Pareja-Blanco
{"title":"Effects of Velocity Loss During Bench-Press Training With Light Relative Loads.","authors":"Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza, José Páez-Maldonado, Clara Cano-Castillo, Beatriz Bachero-Mena, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Fernando Pareja-Blanco","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2023-0529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explored the effects of 4 bench-press (BP) training programs with different velocity-loss (VL) thresholds (0%, 15%, 25%, and 50%) on strength gains and neuromuscular adaptations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six resistance-trained men (22.8 [4.4] y) were randomly assigned into 4 groups that differed in the VL allowed within the set: 0% (VL0), 15% (VL15), 25% (VL25), and 50% (VL50). Training loads (40%-55% 1-repetition maximum), frequency (2 sessions/wk), number of sets (3), and interset recovery (4 min) were identical for all groups. Participants completed the following tests before and after an 8-week (16-session) BP training program: (1) maximal isometric test, (2) progressive loading test, and (3) fatigue test in the BP exercise. During all tests, triceps brachii muscle electromyography was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After completing the resistance-training program, no significant group × time interactions were noticed for isometric and dynamic BP strength variables. The dose-response relationship exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship pattern, with VL25 showing the greatest effect sizes for almost all strength variables analyzed. The total number of repetitions performed during the training program increased as the VL magnitude increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The group that trained with high VL threshold (50%), which performed a total of 876 repetitions, did not experience additional strength gains compared with those experienced by the 0%, 15%, and 25% of VL groups, which performed significantly fewer repetitions (48, 357, and 547, respectively). These findings suggest that when light loads (40%-55% 1-repetition maximum) are used, low and moderate VL thresholds (0%-25%) provide a higher training efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1076-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2023-0529","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored the effects of 4 bench-press (BP) training programs with different velocity-loss (VL) thresholds (0%, 15%, 25%, and 50%) on strength gains and neuromuscular adaptations.

Methods: Forty-six resistance-trained men (22.8 [4.4] y) were randomly assigned into 4 groups that differed in the VL allowed within the set: 0% (VL0), 15% (VL15), 25% (VL25), and 50% (VL50). Training loads (40%-55% 1-repetition maximum), frequency (2 sessions/wk), number of sets (3), and interset recovery (4 min) were identical for all groups. Participants completed the following tests before and after an 8-week (16-session) BP training program: (1) maximal isometric test, (2) progressive loading test, and (3) fatigue test in the BP exercise. During all tests, triceps brachii muscle electromyography was assessed.

Results: After completing the resistance-training program, no significant group × time interactions were noticed for isometric and dynamic BP strength variables. The dose-response relationship exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship pattern, with VL25 showing the greatest effect sizes for almost all strength variables analyzed. The total number of repetitions performed during the training program increased as the VL magnitude increased.

Conclusions: The group that trained with high VL threshold (50%), which performed a total of 876 repetitions, did not experience additional strength gains compared with those experienced by the 0%, 15%, and 25% of VL groups, which performed significantly fewer repetitions (48, 357, and 547, respectively). These findings suggest that when light loads (40%-55% 1-repetition maximum) are used, low and moderate VL thresholds (0%-25%) provide a higher training efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在轻相对负荷下进行卧推训练时速度损失的影响
目的:本研究探讨了4种不同速度损失阈值(VL)(0%、15%、25%和50%)的卧推(BP)训练计划对力量增长和神经肌肉适应性的影响:将 46 名接受过阻力训练的男性(22.8 [4.4] 岁)随机分为 4 组,每组允许的速度损失阈值不同:0%(VL0)、15%(VL15)、25%(VL25)和 50%(VL50)。各组的训练负荷(40%-55% 1 次重复最大值)、训练频率(2 次/周)、组数(3)和组间恢复(4 分钟)均相同。在为期 8 周(16 次课)的 BP 训练计划前后,参与者完成了以下测试:(1)最大等长测试;(2)渐进加载测试;(3)BP 运动中的疲劳测试。在所有测试中,都对肱三头肌肌电进行了评估:结果:完成阻力训练计划后,等长和动态肱二头肌力量变量没有发现明显的组×时间交互作用。剂量-反应关系呈现倒 "U "型关系模式,在几乎所有力量变量分析中,VL25 显示出最大的效应大小。随着 VL 值的增加,训练计划中的总重复次数也在增加:结论:与 VL 值为 0%、15% 和 25% 的组别相比,VL 值为高阈值(50%)的组别总共进行了 876 次重复训练,与之相比,VL 值为 0%、15% 和 25% 的组别并没有获得额外的力量收益,这三个组别的重复次数明显较少(分别为 48 次、357 次和 547 次)。这些研究结果表明,当使用轻负荷(40%-55% 1 次重复最大值)时,低度和中度 VL 临界值(0%-25%)可提供更高的训练效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Effects of the Free Weights and Smith Machine Squat and Bench Press: The Important Role of Specificity for Strength Adaptations. Hip Adduction and Abduction Strength Reference Values of Gaelic Football and Rugby Union Players: A Cross-Sectional Study. Comparison of Optimal Drop Heights in 2 Drop-Jump Exercises for Basketball Athletes With Differing Strength Levels. Confirmation Bias in Sport Science: Understanding and Mitigating Its Impact. Fitness Profiles of Highly Trained Female Futsal Players According to Their Playing Positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1