Spread Through Air Spaces: Interresponder Agreement and Comparison Between Pulmonary and General Pathologists

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Modern Pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100596
{"title":"Spread Through Air Spaces: Interresponder Agreement and Comparison Between Pulmonary and General Pathologists","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spread through air spaces (STAS), an important prognostic indicator included in the 2015 World Health Organization classification, is defined as micropapillary, solid, and/or single tumor cell clusters beyond the edge of the main mass and distinct from processing artifacts. This study aimed to assess the interresponder agreement on current STAS criteria vs artifacts, identify discrepancies, and compare responses between pulmonary and general pathologists. A multiple-choice online questionnaire illustrating multiple criteria for STAS vs artifacts was available internationally for 6 days to Pulmonary Pathology Society members, thoracic pathology course attendees, and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology committee members. Additional 4 questions gathered demographic and practice setting information. One hundred thirty-six unique responses were analyzed. The majority were from North America and Europe (42.6% and 30.2%), practicing pulmonary pathology (70.6%) in academia (64.7%), and with &gt;20 years of experience (31.6%). Excluding trainees, the greatest overall agreement was in defining solid and micropapillary tumor clusters of STAS located ≥3 alveolar spaces from the main tumor edge (91.5%) and recognizing strips of ciliated cells as artifacts (97.7%). Lesser agreement on STAS was evident when tumor cell clusters were immediately adjacent to the tumor edge, a single tumor cell cluster was present at the tissue edge, tumor cell clusters were jagged edged, or tumor cell clusters were admixed with ciliated cell strips (artifacts). There was no significant difference in agreements on STAS for multiple criteria between pulmonary and general pathologists. Significant interresponder agreement on STAS vs artifacts was achieved only for a few criteria. To improve the reproducibility of STAS vs artifacts, areas of lesser agreement require further clarification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893395224001765","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spread through air spaces (STAS), an important prognostic indicator included in the 2015 World Health Organization classification, is defined as micropapillary, solid, and/or single tumor cell clusters beyond the edge of the main mass and distinct from processing artifacts. This study aimed to assess the interresponder agreement on current STAS criteria vs artifacts, identify discrepancies, and compare responses between pulmonary and general pathologists. A multiple-choice online questionnaire illustrating multiple criteria for STAS vs artifacts was available internationally for 6 days to Pulmonary Pathology Society members, thoracic pathology course attendees, and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology committee members. Additional 4 questions gathered demographic and practice setting information. One hundred thirty-six unique responses were analyzed. The majority were from North America and Europe (42.6% and 30.2%), practicing pulmonary pathology (70.6%) in academia (64.7%), and with >20 years of experience (31.6%). Excluding trainees, the greatest overall agreement was in defining solid and micropapillary tumor clusters of STAS located ≥3 alveolar spaces from the main tumor edge (91.5%) and recognizing strips of ciliated cells as artifacts (97.7%). Lesser agreement on STAS was evident when tumor cell clusters were immediately adjacent to the tumor edge, a single tumor cell cluster was present at the tissue edge, tumor cell clusters were jagged edged, or tumor cell clusters were admixed with ciliated cell strips (artifacts). There was no significant difference in agreements on STAS for multiple criteria between pulmonary and general pathologists. Significant interresponder agreement on STAS vs artifacts was achieved only for a few criteria. To improve the reproducibility of STAS vs artifacts, areas of lesser agreement require further clarification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过气隙扩散(STAS):肺部病理学家与普通病理学家之间的应答协议与比较。
通过空气间隙扩散(STAS)是2015年WHO分类中的一项重要预后指标,被定义为主要肿块边缘以外的微乳头状、实性和/或单个肿瘤细胞簇,有别于处理过程中的伪影。本研究旨在评估肺部病理学家和普通病理学家之间对当前 STAS 标准与伪影的共识,找出差异,并比较他们的回答。肺病理学会会员、胸部病理学课程参加者和国际肺癌研究协会病理学委员会成员在全球范围内接受了为期 6 天的多选在线问卷调查,该问卷说明了 STAS 与伪影的多个标准。附加的四个问题收集了人口统计学和实践环境信息。对 136 份独特的回复进行了分析。大多数人来自北美和欧洲(42.6% 和 30.2%),在学术界从事肺病理学工作(70.6%)(64.7%),工作经验超过 20 年(31.6%)。除去受训人员,总体一致度最高的是对距离主肿瘤边缘 > 3 肺泡间隙的 STAS 实性和微乳头状肿瘤簇的定义(91.5%),以及将纤毛细胞条带识别为伪影(97.7%)。当肿瘤细胞簇紧邻肿瘤边缘、组织边缘存在单个肿瘤细胞簇、肿瘤细胞簇边缘呈锯齿状或肿瘤细胞簇与纤毛细胞条(人工制品)混杂在一起时,STAS 的一致性较差。肺病病理学家与普通病理学家在 STAS 多标准上的一致性无明显差异。只有少数标准的 STAS 与伪影在应答者之间达成了显著一致。为了提高 STAS 与伪影的重现性,需要进一步澄清一致性较差的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
期刊最新文献
Proximal and classic epithelioid sarcomas are distinct molecular entities defined by MYC/GATA3 and SOX17/endothelial markers, respectively. Refining Diagnostic Subtypes of Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Using a Multiparameter Approach. Clinicopathologic characteristics and follow up outcomes of invasive breast carcinoma with different positive HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization patterns: experience from a single academic institution. Evaluation of a task specific self-supervised learning framework in digital pathology relative to transfer learning approaches and existing foundation models. GLI1-altered Mesenchymal Tumor - Multi-omic Characterization of a Case Series and Patient-level Meta-analysis of 167 cases for Risk Stratification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1