The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma.

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0041
Ricardo Jardim Neiva, João Felício Rodrigues Neto, Ana Paula Oliveira Nascimento Alves, Patrícia de Sousa Fernandes Queiroz, Leila das Graças Siqueira, Clara Cynthia Melo E Lima, Francisca Souza Santos Dias, Renê Ferreira da Silva-Júnior
{"title":"The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma.","authors":"Ricardo Jardim Neiva, João Felício Rodrigues Neto, Ana Paula Oliveira Nascimento Alves, Patrícia de Sousa Fernandes Queiroz, Leila das Graças Siqueira, Clara Cynthia Melo E Lima, Francisca Souza Santos Dias, Renê Ferreira da Silva-Júnior","doi":"10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to understand the bioethical perspectives on mobile tracking device use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>theoretical study based on action research, carried out with eight graduate students from a public university. A focus group was used, with a thematic content analysis methodology with a codebook structure, approved by the Research Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>from the analysis, there was a concern about using devices after the pandemic ended. Using or not the device, rights inherent to humans, legislation and effectiveness of methods deepen interpretations, moving participants from a personalistic conception of the topic to a vision focused on professional implications about the methods.</p><p><strong>Final considerations: </strong>the debate on the impact of using technological devices on health, especially those that imply restriction of rights that refer to individuals' private life, involves a discussion of a professional nature, in addition to requirement for clear rules on the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":21200,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to understand the bioethical perspectives on mobile tracking device use.

Methods: theoretical study based on action research, carried out with eight graduate students from a public university. A focus group was used, with a thematic content analysis methodology with a codebook structure, approved by the Research Ethics Committee.

Results: from the analysis, there was a concern about using devices after the pandemic ended. Using or not the device, rights inherent to humans, legislation and effectiveness of methods deepen interpretations, moving participants from a personalistic conception of the topic to a vision focused on professional implications about the methods.

Final considerations: the debate on the impact of using technological devices on health, especially those that imply restriction of rights that refer to individuals' private life, involves a discussion of a professional nature, in addition to requirement for clear rules on the topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在公共卫生中使用个人追踪项目:生物伦理学的两难选择。
方法:基于行动研究的理论研究,由来自一所公立大学的八名研究生参与。结果:从分析结果来看,人们对大流行结束后使用设备表示担忧。使用或不使用设备、人类固有的权利、立法和方法的有效性加深了解释,使参与者从对该主题的个人主义概念转向对有关方法的专业影响的看法。最后的思考:关于使用技术设备对健康的影响的讨论,特别是那些意味着限制个人私生活权利的设备,除了要求对该主题做出明确规定外,还涉及到专业性质的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
477
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem created in 1932, March 20 is the official publication of the Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (Brazilian Nursing Association) has as purpose to disseminate the scientific production from different nursing interest areas of knowledge, including those which express the political project of the Association. The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem is the oldest journal of the Brazilian nursing. Its first title was "Annaes de Enfermagem" from 1932 to 1941, being entitled Anais de Enfermagem" until 1955, when its title was changed to the current.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the vaccination situation against Mpox in people living with HIV/AIDS: an ecological study. Indigenous women's experiences about the pregnancy-puerperal cycle. Consequences of the legislation issued for nursing education in times of COVID-19 (2020-2022). Development and validation of a mobile application prototype for postoperative cardiac surgery. Indicators of emotional distress and mindfulness in undergraduate students: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1