{"title":"[Need for prosthodontics of permanent teeth in children aged 8-18 years].","authors":"P S Timoshenko, M V Korolenkova","doi":"10.17116/stomat202410304167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reveal need for prosthodontics in permanent teeth in children aged 8-18 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was performed in Khimki Dental Municipal Clinic. Dental examination and radiological studies were conducted in 97 primary patients aged 8-18 years. Indications for prosthodontics in permanent teeth were occlusal deterioration index more than 40% and crown decay of more than 50% in incisors and canines. Additional features were registered including DMFT index, the presence of extracted teeth and teeth after root canal treatment, as well and teeth with extensive restorations with resins and marginal seal quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 97 primary patients (27.8%) children needed prosthodontics in permanent teeth (in average 2.3±2.1 teeth): 1 tooth in 10 children, 2 teeth in 11 children, 3 teeth in 1 child, 4 teeth in 3 children and 4 teeth in 2 children. Mean DMFT was 8.1±4.5 teeth. Six children already had extracted permanent teeth (9 teeth in total). Half of the teeth (49.2%) which needed orthodontic treatment had history of root canal treatment while 46% needed primary or secondary endodontic treatment. Occlusal deterioration index was more than 40% in 41.3% of cases, more than 60% in 49.2% of teeth and more than 80% in 9.52% of teeth. From all the teeth restored with composite resins 41.7% had good marginal seal but 58.3% showed macroscopic signs of marginal leakage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows high percentage of adolescents having need for prosthodontics in permanent teeth and unjustified widening of indications for direct resin restorations in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35887,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiya","volume":"103 4","pages":"67-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410304167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To reveal need for prosthodontics in permanent teeth in children aged 8-18 years.
Materials and methods: The study was performed in Khimki Dental Municipal Clinic. Dental examination and radiological studies were conducted in 97 primary patients aged 8-18 years. Indications for prosthodontics in permanent teeth were occlusal deterioration index more than 40% and crown decay of more than 50% in incisors and canines. Additional features were registered including DMFT index, the presence of extracted teeth and teeth after root canal treatment, as well and teeth with extensive restorations with resins and marginal seal quality.
Results: From 97 primary patients (27.8%) children needed prosthodontics in permanent teeth (in average 2.3±2.1 teeth): 1 tooth in 10 children, 2 teeth in 11 children, 3 teeth in 1 child, 4 teeth in 3 children and 4 teeth in 2 children. Mean DMFT was 8.1±4.5 teeth. Six children already had extracted permanent teeth (9 teeth in total). Half of the teeth (49.2%) which needed orthodontic treatment had history of root canal treatment while 46% needed primary or secondary endodontic treatment. Occlusal deterioration index was more than 40% in 41.3% of cases, more than 60% in 49.2% of teeth and more than 80% in 9.52% of teeth. From all the teeth restored with composite resins 41.7% had good marginal seal but 58.3% showed macroscopic signs of marginal leakage.
Conclusion: Our study shows high percentage of adolescents having need for prosthodontics in permanent teeth and unjustified widening of indications for direct resin restorations in this group of patients.