[The choice of method of surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency].

Q4 Medicine Stomatologiya Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17116/stomat202410304137
V A Pavlovich, T Z Chkadua, A I Anelikov
{"title":"[The choice of method of surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency].","authors":"V A Pavlovich, T Z Chkadua, A I Anelikov","doi":"10.17116/stomat202410304137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish the criteria for selecting surgical treatments for velopharyngeal disfunction and to evaluate their effectiveness.</p><p><p>Materials and Methods. 34 patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency underwent surgery at the National Medical Research Center for Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery. Five common surgical methods for treating velopharyngeal disfunction were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The choice of surgery was primarily based on the anatomical and functional state of the muscle lifting the soft palate, specifically its position, which was determined visually or by MRI. Repositioning of the muscle helped to improve or restore speech in patients with velopharyngeal disfunction through surgeries such as secondary cleft revision, Furlow's palatoplasty, and triangular miomucosal flaps. In cases of soft palate palsy or correct positioning of the m. levator veli palatini, the focus of surgical treatment shifted to the pharynx, where surgeries like pharyngoplasty with a posterior pharyngeal flap and Hynes pharyngoplasties were performed. These also improved or restored speech in patients, though more towards improvement than complete restoration. If the muscle's position was optimal, the choice of treatment method subsequently depended on the results of additional nasopharyngoscopy: determining the size of the opening and the type of velopharyngeal closure. Besides the common methods used for speech management, various surgical procedures were combined based on the clinical situation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The position of the levator muscle is very important for its function. The optimal treatment for velopharyngeal disfunction, especially in patients with large openings, involved using a buccal flap alone or in combination with triangular mucosal-muscle flaps, where the highest percentage of normal speech rate was achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":35887,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiya","volume":"103 4","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410304137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To establish the criteria for selecting surgical treatments for velopharyngeal disfunction and to evaluate their effectiveness.

Materials and Methods. 34 patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency underwent surgery at the National Medical Research Center for Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery. Five common surgical methods for treating velopharyngeal disfunction were employed.

Results: The choice of surgery was primarily based on the anatomical and functional state of the muscle lifting the soft palate, specifically its position, which was determined visually or by MRI. Repositioning of the muscle helped to improve or restore speech in patients with velopharyngeal disfunction through surgeries such as secondary cleft revision, Furlow's palatoplasty, and triangular miomucosal flaps. In cases of soft palate palsy or correct positioning of the m. levator veli palatini, the focus of surgical treatment shifted to the pharynx, where surgeries like pharyngoplasty with a posterior pharyngeal flap and Hynes pharyngoplasties were performed. These also improved or restored speech in patients, though more towards improvement than complete restoration. If the muscle's position was optimal, the choice of treatment method subsequently depended on the results of additional nasopharyngoscopy: determining the size of the opening and the type of velopharyngeal closure. Besides the common methods used for speech management, various surgical procedures were combined based on the clinical situation.

Conclusion: The position of the levator muscle is very important for its function. The optimal treatment for velopharyngeal disfunction, especially in patients with large openings, involved using a buccal flap alone or in combination with triangular mucosal-muscle flaps, where the highest percentage of normal speech rate was achieved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[咽鼓管发育不全手术治疗方法的选择]。
目的建立选择包咽功能障碍手术治疗方法的标准,并评估其有效性。国立外科和颌面外科医学研究中心对 34 名会咽功能不全患者进行了手术治疗。结果:手术的选择主要基于提拉软腭肌肉的解剖和功能状态,特别是其位置,这是由肉眼或核磁共振成像确定的。通过二次裂缝整复术、Furlow腭成形术和三角粘膜瓣等手术,重新定位肌肉有助于改善或恢复咽喉功能障碍患者的语言能力。在软腭麻痹或腭上提肌位置不正的病例中,手术治疗的重点转移到了咽部,在咽部进行了咽后皮瓣咽成形术和 Hynes 咽成形术等手术。这些手术也能改善或恢复患者的语言能力,但更多的是改善而非完全恢复。如果肌肉的位置是最佳的,那么治疗方法的选择就取决于鼻咽镜检查的结果:确定开口的大小和咽部闭合的类型。除了言语治疗的常用方法外,还根据临床情况将各种手术方法结合起来:结论:提上睑肌的位置对其功能非常重要。包咽功能障碍的最佳治疗方法是单独使用颊侧皮瓣或结合三角粘膜-肌肉皮瓣,尤其是开口较大的患者,在这种情况下,正常说话率的比例最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stomatologiya
Stomatologiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊最新文献
[A clinical case of piloleiomyoma]. [Bond strength of metal brackets to enamel with a Russian adhesive complex: an in vitro study]. [Elimination of defects in the Schneiderian membrane during sinus lift operations]. [Evaluation of the efficiency of the method of biological feedback in complex therapy of patients with hypertonus of the chewing muscles]. [Features of medical care provision in the profile «Maxillofacial surgery» in the Southern Federal District of the Russian Federation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1