Reframing covenant for nursing: From individual commitments to covenant with society.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/nup.12498
Dorolen Wolfs, Darlaine Jantzen, Marsha Fowler, Lynn C Musto, Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham
{"title":"Reframing covenant for nursing: From individual commitments to covenant with society.","authors":"Dorolen Wolfs, Darlaine Jantzen, Marsha Fowler, Lynn C Musto, Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham","doi":"10.1111/nup.12498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Today's constrained healthcare environment can make it very difficult for nurses to provide compassionate, competent, and ethical care, and yet their continued commitment to care is viewed as requisite. Nurses' commitment to care of patients, enmeshed with professional identity, may be understood as heroic. A few nursing scholars have advanced the concept of a nurse-patient covenant to explain or inspire nurses' commitment to care. Covenant describes an enduring relationship characterised by mutual promises and generous responsiveness. However, recent critique has revealed a general misunderstanding and misuse of the term covenant in much of the nursing literature whereby individual nurses are improperly and impossibly idealised as holding sole responsibility in the commitment to care. Such an interpretation obscures society's responsibilities in caring for both patients and nurses and contributes to the idealisation of nurses' commitment to extend themselves to fill in healthcare system gaps. Yet, the concept of a covenant relationship, when reframed as occurring between society and the profession of nursing, may lead us toward solutions to the very problems the originally misused concept sustained. Evidence within healthcare systems globally suggests that nurses' commitments are fragile or fragmented under duress due to increasing pressure, demands, and even risks. A reframing of covenant has the common good for society and nursing at its core and, we argue, may lead to a more sustainable nursing identity. We present the results of an exploratory project, undertaken to examine the utility and suitability of covenant as a relational framework for nursing. We explore a reframing of a covenant of care as a relationship between nursing and society, which may provide a fruitful path toward a sustainable, shared commitment for healthcare. This covenant of care re-centres shared work-a joint responsibility between society and nursing-as necessary for the common good.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today's constrained healthcare environment can make it very difficult for nurses to provide compassionate, competent, and ethical care, and yet their continued commitment to care is viewed as requisite. Nurses' commitment to care of patients, enmeshed with professional identity, may be understood as heroic. A few nursing scholars have advanced the concept of a nurse-patient covenant to explain or inspire nurses' commitment to care. Covenant describes an enduring relationship characterised by mutual promises and generous responsiveness. However, recent critique has revealed a general misunderstanding and misuse of the term covenant in much of the nursing literature whereby individual nurses are improperly and impossibly idealised as holding sole responsibility in the commitment to care. Such an interpretation obscures society's responsibilities in caring for both patients and nurses and contributes to the idealisation of nurses' commitment to extend themselves to fill in healthcare system gaps. Yet, the concept of a covenant relationship, when reframed as occurring between society and the profession of nursing, may lead us toward solutions to the very problems the originally misused concept sustained. Evidence within healthcare systems globally suggests that nurses' commitments are fragile or fragmented under duress due to increasing pressure, demands, and even risks. A reframing of covenant has the common good for society and nursing at its core and, we argue, may lead to a more sustainable nursing identity. We present the results of an exploratory project, undertaken to examine the utility and suitability of covenant as a relational framework for nursing. We explore a reframing of a covenant of care as a relationship between nursing and society, which may provide a fruitful path toward a sustainable, shared commitment for healthcare. This covenant of care re-centres shared work-a joint responsibility between society and nursing-as necessary for the common good.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重塑护理契约:从个人承诺到与社会立约。
如今,医疗环境的限制使护士很难提供富有同情心、胜任和符合道德规范的护理,但他们对护理的持续承诺却被视为是必要的。护士对患者的护理承诺与职业身份紧密相连,可以被理解为英雄主义。一些护理学者提出了 "护患契约 "的概念,以解释或激励护士对护理的承诺。盟约描述了一种以相互承诺和慷慨回应为特征的持久关系。然而,最近的批评揭示了许多护理文献中对 "盟约 "一词的普遍误解和滥用,护士个人被不恰当地、不可能地理想化为护理承诺中的唯一责任人。这种解释掩盖了社会在照顾病人和护士方面的责任,助长了将护士为填补医疗保健系统的空白而奉献自己的理想化。然而,当盟约关系的概念被重新定义为发生在社会和护理专业之间时,它可能会引导我们解决最初被误用的概念所带来的问题。全球医疗系统中的证据表明,由于压力、要求甚至风险不断增加,护士的承诺变得脆弱或支离破碎。我们认为,重塑 "契约 "的核心是社会和护理工作的共同利益,这可能会使护理身份更具可持续性。我们介绍了一个探索性项目的成果,该项目旨在研究盟约作为护理关系框架的实用性和适宜性。我们将护理盟约重新定义为护理与社会之间的关系,这可能会为实现可持续的、共同的医疗承诺提供一条富有成效的道路。这种护理盟约将共同工作--社会与护理之间的共同责任--作为共同利益的必要中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other? Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.
期刊最新文献
Building a Pluriverse of Nursologies: A paradigm for decolonial theory and knowledge development in nursing. Occupational Health Nursing models and theories: A critical analysis in the scope of the unitary-transformative perspective. Opening of the annual special collection: 26th International Nursing Philosophy Conference proceedings in association with IPONS: Re-imagining a nursing ecosystem in an uncertain world. A philosophical exploration of rural health and nursing based on an undergraduate United States-Australian collaboration through the lens of 'positionality'. Reframing covenant for nursing: From individual commitments to covenant with society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1