Endpoints and outcomes for localized scleroderma/morphea: a scoping literature review.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1186/s12969-024-01014-x
Alexy Hernandez, Leslie Zapata Leiva, Maria Mutka, Kathryn S Torok, Leila Ledbetter, Christina K Zigler
{"title":"Endpoints and outcomes for localized scleroderma/morphea: a scoping literature review.","authors":"Alexy Hernandez, Leslie Zapata Leiva, Maria Mutka, Kathryn S Torok, Leila Ledbetter, Christina K Zigler","doi":"10.1186/s12969-024-01014-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current treatment for localized scleroderma (LS) has been shown to halt disease activity, but little is still known about patient experiences with these treatments, nor is there consensus about optimal measurement strategies for future clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a scoping review of the literature for the types of outcomes and measures (i.e. clinician-, patient-, and caregiver-reported) utilized in published treatment studies of LS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online databases were searched for articles related to the evaluation of treatment efficacy in LS with a special focus on pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 168 studies, the most common outcomes used were cutaneous disease activity and damage measured via clinician-reported assessments. The most frequently cited measure was the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT). Few patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Some studies only vaguely reported the measures utilized, and the review yielded a low number of clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to evaluating disease activity with clinician-reported measures, the field could obtain critical knowledge on the patient experience by including high-quality PROMs of symptoms and functioning. More clinical trials using a variety of outcomes and measures are necessary to determine the most suitable course of treatment for LS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54630,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Rheumatology","volume":"22 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11337887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-024-01014-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current treatment for localized scleroderma (LS) has been shown to halt disease activity, but little is still known about patient experiences with these treatments, nor is there consensus about optimal measurement strategies for future clinical trials.

Objective: Conduct a scoping review of the literature for the types of outcomes and measures (i.e. clinician-, patient-, and caregiver-reported) utilized in published treatment studies of LS.

Methods: Online databases were searched for articles related to the evaluation of treatment efficacy in LS with a special focus on pediatrics.

Results: Of the 168 studies, the most common outcomes used were cutaneous disease activity and damage measured via clinician-reported assessments. The most frequently cited measure was the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT). Few patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used.

Limitations: Some studies only vaguely reported the measures utilized, and the review yielded a low number of clinical trials.

Conclusion: In addition to evaluating disease activity with clinician-reported measures, the field could obtain critical knowledge on the patient experience by including high-quality PROMs of symptoms and functioning. More clinical trials using a variety of outcomes and measures are necessary to determine the most suitable course of treatment for LS patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部硬皮病/褥疮的终点和结果:范围界定文献综述。
背景:目前对局部硬皮病(LS)的治疗已被证明能阻止疾病活动,但患者对这些治疗的体验仍知之甚少,对未来临床试验的最佳测量策略也未达成共识:对已发表的 LS 治疗研究中使用的结果类型和测量方法(即临床医生、患者和护理人员报告)的文献进行范围界定:方法:在在线数据库中搜索与 LS 疗效评估相关的文章,重点关注儿科:在168项研究中,最常用的结果是通过临床医生报告的评估来衡量皮肤疾病的活动性和损害。最常引用的方法是局部硬皮病皮肤评估工具(LoSCAT)。很少使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs):局限性:有些研究只是含糊地报告了所使用的测量方法,而且综述中得出的临床试验数量较少:结论:除了用临床医生报告的指标评估疾病活动性外,该领域还可以通过纳入高质量的症状和功能PROM来获得有关患者体验的重要知识。为了确定最适合LS患者的治疗方案,有必要开展更多使用各种结果和测量方法的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Rheumatology
Pediatric Rheumatology PEDIATRICS-RHEUMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Rheumatology is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal encompassing all aspects of clinical and basic research related to pediatric rheumatology and allied subjects. The journal’s scope of diseases and syndromes include musculoskeletal pain syndromes, rheumatic fever and post-streptococcal syndromes, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile dermatomyositis, local and systemic scleroderma, Kawasaki disease, Henoch-Schonlein purpura and other vasculitides, sarcoidosis, inherited musculoskeletal syndromes, autoinflammatory syndromes, and others.
期刊最新文献
Real-world psychosocial impact among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and families in Spain. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. The patient's voice: a cross-sectional study of physical health and disability in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatric case of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy with anti-HMGCR antibodies and dermatomyositis skin rash. Epstein-Barr Virus encephalitis associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1