Cognitive and functional change in skilled nursing facilities: Differences by delirium and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19112
Jane S. Saczynski PhD, Benjamin Koethe MPH, Donna Marie Fick PhD, Quynh T. Vo MPH, John W. Devlin PharmD, Edward R. Marcantonio MD, Becky A. Briesacher PhD
{"title":"Cognitive and functional change in skilled nursing facilities: Differences by delirium and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias","authors":"Jane S. Saczynski PhD,&nbsp;Benjamin Koethe MPH,&nbsp;Donna Marie Fick PhD,&nbsp;Quynh T. Vo MPH,&nbsp;John W. Devlin PharmD,&nbsp;Edward R. Marcantonio MD,&nbsp;Becky A. Briesacher PhD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Whether cognitive and functional recovery in skilled nursing facilities (SNF) following hospitalization differs by delirium and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (ADRD) has not been examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare change in cognition and function among short-stay SNF patients with delirium, ADRD, or both.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study using claims data from 2011 to 2013.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Centers for Medicare and Medicaid certified SNFs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 740,838 older adults newly admitted to a short-stay SNF without prevalent ADRD who had at least two assessments of cognition and function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>Incident delirium was measured by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Confusion Assessment Method and ICD-9 codes, and incident ADRD by ICD-9 codes and MDS diagnoses. Cognitive improvement was a better or maximum score on the MDS Brief Interview for Mental Status, and functional recovery was a better or maximum score on the MDS Activities of Daily Living Scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Within 30 days of SNF admission, the rate of cognitive improvement in patients with both delirium/ADRD was half that of patients with neither delirium/ADRD (HR = 0.45, 95% CI:0.43, 0.46). The ADRD-only and delirium-only groups also were 43% less likely to have improved cognition or function compared to those with neither delirium/ADRD (HR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.56, 0.58 and HR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.55, 0.60, respectively). Functional improvement was less likely in patients with both delirium/ADRD, as well (HR = 0.85, 95% CI:0.83, 0.87). The ADRD only and delirium only groups were also less likely to improve in function (HR = 0.93, 95% CI:0.92, 0.94 and HR = 0.92, 95% CI:0.90, 0.93, respectively) compared to those with neither delirium/ADRD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among older adults without dementia admitted to SNF for post-acute care following hospitalization, a positive screen for delirium and a new diagnosis of ADRD, within 7 days of SNF admission, were both significantly associated with worse cognitive and functional recovery. Patients with both delirium and new ADRD had the worst cognitive and functional recovery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 11","pages":"3501-3509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Whether cognitive and functional recovery in skilled nursing facilities (SNF) following hospitalization differs by delirium and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (ADRD) has not been examined.

Objective

To compare change in cognition and function among short-stay SNF patients with delirium, ADRD, or both.

Design

Retrospective cohort study using claims data from 2011 to 2013.

Setting

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid certified SNFs.

Participants

A total of 740,838 older adults newly admitted to a short-stay SNF without prevalent ADRD who had at least two assessments of cognition and function.

Measurements

Incident delirium was measured by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Confusion Assessment Method and ICD-9 codes, and incident ADRD by ICD-9 codes and MDS diagnoses. Cognitive improvement was a better or maximum score on the MDS Brief Interview for Mental Status, and functional recovery was a better or maximum score on the MDS Activities of Daily Living Scale.

Results

Within 30 days of SNF admission, the rate of cognitive improvement in patients with both delirium/ADRD was half that of patients with neither delirium/ADRD (HR = 0.45, 95% CI:0.43, 0.46). The ADRD-only and delirium-only groups also were 43% less likely to have improved cognition or function compared to those with neither delirium/ADRD (HR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.56, 0.58 and HR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.55, 0.60, respectively). Functional improvement was less likely in patients with both delirium/ADRD, as well (HR = 0.85, 95% CI:0.83, 0.87). The ADRD only and delirium only groups were also less likely to improve in function (HR = 0.93, 95% CI:0.92, 0.94 and HR = 0.92, 95% CI:0.90, 0.93, respectively) compared to those with neither delirium/ADRD.

Conclusions

Among older adults without dementia admitted to SNF for post-acute care following hospitalization, a positive screen for delirium and a new diagnosis of ADRD, within 7 days of SNF admission, were both significantly associated with worse cognitive and functional recovery. Patients with both delirium and new ADRD had the worst cognitive and functional recovery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业护理机构中的认知和功能变化:谵妄和阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症的差异。
背景:尚未研究住院后在专业护理机构(SNF)中的认知和功能恢复是否因谵妄和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(ADRD)而有所不同:比较患有谵妄、阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症(ADRD)或同时患有这两种疾病的短期住院专业护理机构(SNF)患者在认知和功能方面的变化:设计:使用 2011 年至 2013 年的理赔数据进行回顾性队列研究:地点:美国医疗保险和医疗补助中心认证的SNF:共有 740,838 名新入住短期 SNF 且无 ADRD 的老年人,他们至少接受过两次认知和功能评估:事件谵妄通过最小数据集(MDS)混乱评估方法和ICD-9编码进行测量,事件ADRD通过ICD-9编码和MDS诊断进行测量。认知能力的改善是指在 MDS 精神状态简短访谈中获得较好或最高分,功能恢复是指在 MDS 日常生活活动量表中获得较好或最高分:在入住SNF的30天内,同时患有谵妄/ADRD的患者的认知能力改善率是未患有谵妄/ADRD患者的一半(HR = 0.45,95% CI:0.43,0.46)。与既无谵妄又无ADRD的患者相比,仅有ADRD组和仅有谵妄组的认知或功能改善的可能性也要低43%(HR=0.57,95% CI:0.56,0.58和HR=0.57,95% CI:0.55,0.60)。同时患有谵妄/ADRD的患者功能改善的可能性也较低(HR = 0.85,95% CI:0.83,0.87)。与既无谵妄又无ADRD的患者相比,仅有ADRD组和仅有谵妄组的患者功能改善的可能性也较小(分别为HR = 0.93,95% CI:0.92,0.94和HR = 0.92,95% CI:0.90,0.93):在住院后入住SNF进行后期护理的无痴呆症老年人中,入院7天内谵妄筛查呈阳性和新诊断为ADRD都与认知和功能恢复较差密切相关。同时患有谵妄和新的 ADRD 的患者认知和功能恢复最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Notices Issue Information Cover Issue Information Author Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1