Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16039-5
Helana Ghali, Michelle M Dugan, Shaliz Aflatooni, Aleena Boby, Danielle K DePalo, José Laborde, Junsung Choi, Altan F Ahmed, Jonathan S Zager
{"title":"Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.","authors":"Helana Ghali, Michelle M Dugan, Shaliz Aflatooni, Aleena Boby, Danielle K DePalo, José Laborde, Junsung Choi, Altan F Ahmed, Jonathan S Zager","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16039-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"9150-9158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16039-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing.

Patients and methods: A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023.

Results: A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮肝灌注 (PHP) 作为转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的一线或二线疗法后的肝脏和总体无进展生存期。
背景:葡萄膜黑色素瘤常转移至肝脏,预后较差。通过经皮肝灌注(PHP)的美法仑/肝脏给药系统(HDS)是一种通过受影响肝脏循环高剂量化疗的微创方法。本研究评估了美法仑/HDS作为一线或二线治疗的使用情况,以指导治疗排序:回顾性研究纳入了2008年至2023年期间通过PHP接受美法仑/HDS治疗的肝转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者:共发现30例患者,53.3%为女性,中位年龄为63.5岁(37-78岁)。中位随访时间为 14.5 个月。一线疗法包括美法仑/HDS(17 例)、肝脏导向疗法(7 例)和免疫疗法(6 例)。二线疗法包括美法仑/HDS(6例)、免疫疗法(5例)和肝脏导向疗法(3例)。一线美法仑/HDS、免疫疗法和肝脏导向疗法的中位肝脏无进展生存期(hPFS)分别为17.6/8.8/9.2个月(P = 0.002)。二线美罗啡/HDS、免疫疗法和肝脏导向疗法的中位生存期分别为14.7/7.5个月(P<0.001)。一线美法仑/HDS、免疫疗法和肝脏导向疗法的中位总生存时间分别为15.4/8.8/9.2个月(P = 0.04)。二线美法仑/HDS、免疫疗法和肝脏导向疗法的中位总生存期分别为22.2/14.7/7.5个月(P = 0.001):通过PHP治疗转移至肝脏的葡萄膜黑色素瘤的美法仑/HDS,与免疫疗法或肝脏导向疗法相比,作为一线疗法可显著改善hPFS和总PFS。与二线免疫疗法或肝脏导向疗法相比,PHP 作为二线疗法时的 hPFS 和 PFS 继续得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The Top Ten Annals of Surgical Oncology Original Articles on Twitter/X: 2020-2023. Correction: ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgery, Three-Dimensional (3D) Reconstruction and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: The Perfect Combo to Enter the Era of Intraoperative Liver Navigation. Correction: Patient-Reported Outcomes 10 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. ASO Visual Abstract: Evaluating the Efficacy of Different Treatment Intensities in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Nationwide Cancer Registry-Based Study. ASO Visual Abstract: Cost-Analysis of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1