Annals of Surgical Oncology最新文献

Background: This study aimed to examine clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival rates in a contemporary population-based cohort of adult prostate sarcoma patients.

Methods: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), adult patients with prostate sarcoma were identified. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, smoothed cumulative incidence plots, and Cox regression models were used.

Results: Of 125 patients, 45 (36%) harbored leiomyosarcoma, 17 (14%) had rhabdomyosarcoma, 15 (12%) had stromal sarcoma, 17 (14%) had sarcoma not otherwise specified (NOS), and 31 (25%) had other sarcoma subtypes. Metastatic stage was most common in the rhabdomyosarcoma patients (44%) and least common in the leiomyosarcoma (21%) and stromal sarcoma (20%) patients. Most of the rhabdomyosarcoma patients received the combination of systemic and radiation therapy with (24%) or without radical surgery (35%), whereas most of the leiomyosarcoma and stromal sarcoma patients underwent radical surgery with (22 and 13%) or without (22 and 47%) radiation. In the overall population, the median overall survival was 27 months. The 5-years overall versus cancer-specific versus other-cause mortality rates were respectively 71 versus 58 versus 13%. In the multivariable Cox regression models, the highest overall mortality was exhibited by the patients with metastatic disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-5.31; p < 0.001) or unknown disease stage (HR 2.94; 95% CI 2.20-7.21; p = 0.019). Conversely, of all the histologic subtypes, only stromal sarcoma distinguished itself by lower overall mortality (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.96; p = 0.039).

Conclusions: Four major histologic subtypes were identified. Among most adult sarcoma patients, treatment patterns vary according to histology, from multimodal therapy to radical prostatectomy alone. These treatment differences reflect equally important heterogeneity in survival patterns.

In this era of precision medicine, incorporating quantitative measures of estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)/Ki-67 expressions and genomic assays could more precisely identify neoadjuvant systemic therapy with the highest likelihood of response and tumor downstaging. In our recent study, we quantified the likelihood of achieving breast-conserving surgery (BCS vs. mastectomy) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy as a function of demographics, quantitative ER/PR/Ki-67 expressions, 21-gene recurrence scores, or 70-gene risk scores in early-stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Using the 2010-2020 National Cancer Database, we found that the BCS rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was higher among patients with high 21-gene recurrence scores, lower ER/PR expression, or higher Ki-67 expression. Most patients who received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy underwent BCS, which was mostly dependent on ER expression. Asian women were less likely than white women to undergo BCS after neoadjuvant treatments. Lack of health insurance was associated with lower odds of BCS in both neoadjuvant settings. Although our study provides insight into the associations of BCS with quantitative biomarkers at a single time point, several questions remain unanswered. With the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant therapies in development for HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, ongoing work using quantitative biomarkers and genomic assay scores is needed to select the right neoadjuvant systemic therapy for the right patient. Given the increasing amount of data available at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, novel computational approaches are needed to integrate patient demographic and tumor-specific factors to predict the optimal treatment strategy and likelihood of BCS.

Background: Although visceral pleural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, tumor spread through air spaces, and poor differentiation are pathological risk factors associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the cumulative impact of these factors on prognosis remains unclear.

Methods: We enrolled 1532 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Patients were divided according to the number of risk factors as follows: Group A (without risk factors), Group B (one risk factor), and Group C (multiple risk factors). Moreover, we stratified patients into two subgroups based on tumor size (≤ 3 cm, 3-4 cm). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: Overall, 949, 404, and 179 patients were included in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Group C had a larger tumor size and more cases of extrathoracic recurrence than the other groups. The 5-year DFS and OS gradually decreased across Groups A to C (DFS: 94.3%, 80.6%, and 64.3%, respectively, p < 0.001; OS: 97.2%, 92.7%, and 77%, respectively, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for tumors ≤ 3 cm in size (DFS: 95.2%, 83.2%, and 68.5%, respectively, p < 0.001; OS: 97.6%, 94.1%, and 79.6%, respectively, p < 0.001), but a less pronounced trend was observed for tumors between 3 and 4 cm in size (DFS: 72.1, 60.8, and 43.3%, respectively, p = 0.054; OS: 85.7, 82.1, and 64.7%, respectively, p = 0.16).

Conclusions: Postoperative survival worsened with increasing pathological risk factors in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma, especially those with tumor size ≤ 3 cm.

Background: For premalignant main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (MD-IPMN), laparoscopic duodenum and spleen-preserving subtotal or total pancreatectomy (LDSP-STP/TP) seems to be a viable option for parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomy.

Patients and methods: On the basis of the imaging features, family history, genomic alterations, intraoperative ultrasound examination, and frozen section evaluation, we have proposed patient selection strategies for the LDSP-STP/TP technique for the first time. Additionally, a comprehensive step-by-step overview of this technique has been provided. To date, we have performed five LDSP-STP procedures and one LDSP-TP procedure.

Results: We successfully performed selective resection of the affected pancreatic parenchyma while preserving the duodenum, common bile duct (CBD), spleen, and splenic artery and vein. The operation time ranged from 295 to 495 min, with blood loss ranging from 100 to 300 mL. Postoperative pathological results revealed low-grade dysplasia in the resected pancreatic samples and margins. The patients resumed eating within 3-5 days after surgery, and all postoperative complications were classified as grade I according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. At the 3-month follow-up, there were no cases of CBD ischemic stenosis, splenic ischemia, or pseudocyst formation observed. For patients who received LDSP-STP, the longitudinal diameter of the remaining pancreatic tail ranged from 2.2 to 4.6 cm, and they demonstrated satisfactory long-term blood glycemic control.

Conclusions: LDSP-STP/TP demonstrates technical feasibility and safety. It allows for the selective resection of the affected pancreatic parenchyma, thereby minimizing the impact of pancreatic functional impairment. However, it is crucial to validate this technique through long-term prospective observations.

Background: The incidence of diffuse-type gastric cancer is increasing steadily in the United States, Europe, and Asia. This subtype is known for aggressive clinical characteristics and transmural invasion. However, T1a diffuse-type cancers have been observed to have a better 5-year, disease-specific mortality than stage-matched intestinal tumors, supporting a clinical difference in these early-stage cancers.

Methods: Data on all living patients with T1a gastric adenocarcinoma with a finding of signet ring cell morphology on pathology and ≥1 year of follow-up from 2013 to 2023 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) was collected from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with known CDH1 or CTNNA1 mutations were excluded.

Results: In 7 of 30 patients, sporadic pathologically confirmed T1a signet ring cell (diffuse) cancer identified on initial biopsy was no longer detectable upon subsequent biopsy or resection with mean follow-up of 50 months.

Conclusions: These cases allude to the distinct pathways of carcinogenesis in T1a signet ring cell cancers. Potential factors that may underlie the spontaneous regression of these T1a cancers include complete removal at initial biopsy, immune clearance, and lack of survival advantage conferred by signet ring cell genetic alterations in these cases. Given their more indolent behavior at an earlier stage, we suggest that these lesions can be closely followed by endoscopy in select circumstances with thorough disease assessment and an experienced care team.